Do real managers only look at the results and not the process?

A true manager generally focuses only on the process, not just the outcome, because the process is particularly important in exercising your ability to bring the people you manage together, and this process is not something that can be successful overnight. <>

When I was the general manager, when I held an all-hands meeting, I said, "I'm a consequentialist." I only look at the results you do, I don't look at how much sweat you sweat in the process, how many shifts you work over, how well you cooperate, and how many suggestions you make.

Only when the result is that the goal is accomplished, and your good performance is good and effective. Then while you get the full work bonus, I will add the bonus to your other good performance suggestions.

A really good manager generally pays more attention to the process rather than the result in the work, what he needs is your serious attitude towards the work, and the attitude reflects everything. A correct attitude shows that you are a simple and pure person, and the company needs such talents more. <>

Not like this, I think a real manager should not only look at the result but also look at the process, because in the process of looking at the process, you will know what some mistakes or advantages are, you can correct the mistakes in time, and if you have a lot of things, you have to expand it, and then understand it.

<> real managers, they first look at the results, they don't look at the process, they just look at the results first and then look at the process, he only sees a good result, he will look at your process.

Of course not, a good manager will coordinate the overall situation, and then make a decision that they feel is the most correct, it is impossible to only look at the result, not look at the process, after all, he also climbed up from the bottom step by step.

No, for the manager, although the result is the most important, the process is also very important, and the manager will also see the effort in the process, because the manager should find your strengths in the process of work and arrange you to the right place to make the best use of it.

Of course not, although sometimes the result is really more important than everything, but sometimes the process also needs to be referenced, such as the kind of process-based thing is to only look at the process, not just the result.

A real manager can't say that he takes care of everyone, which is not realistic, but he will definitely know the thoughts and emotions of the public, as the saying goes, those who win the hearts of the people win the world, only get the hearts of employees, they will work for you seriously.

As a manager, it is true that he only looks at the results and not the process, because he is between their interests, and he can't. He also looks at what you have done in the middle, and he looks at what your final result is.

Through the vertical and horizontal comparison of work results, to measure the management level of the unit, this is the real sense of the manager's comprehensive management pursuit. Doing business is not to create jobs, but among the customers who do business, the company has its own corporate values, contacts potential customers through various channels, and provides deep and good service to its target customers from the inside out, so that customers can output and pay for the value of the enterprise, and serve you, instead of one or two customers, it is a multi-type customer, and then through the enterprise value chain to deliver value, but a person can never do all the work, can only divide labor according to the entire business process, set up positions, Then employ professional skills and knowledge to disturb Heju, shoot oranges and have certain qualities, through the division of labor and the refinement of cooperation, in a reasonable time and at a reasonable cost, to provide products and services that meet customer needs to create an exchange value behavior.

I think this approach is unreasonable, and it will only lead to some shoddy works being presented, which will lead to the inner impetuousness of employees.

Because what managers want is the outcome, and the outcome can determine all the fate of the company, so the outcome is very important.

It is common to hear some business managers say to their subordinates: "I only look at the results, not the process." "Only looking at the results, not the process" has also become a way of thinking, management and management discourse for many managers.

There are three reasons why managers have such management behavior. First of all, managers believe that "only looking at the results, not the process" is a generally correct management style; Second, managers do not have the ability to manage the process, including the energy and time to manage the process; The third reason is that managers are too lazy and unwilling to manage the process.

Only look at the results, not the process", can only be a management behavior, not a management method. If you want to rely on the management method, it can also be understood as authorization management. If "only looking at the result, not looking at the process" is regarded as an authorization management behavior, there is a certain degree of reasonableness.

However, authorization stealth management is contextual and conditional, and when you decide to delegate, you have made an initial assessment of the importance and complexity of the outcome and the process and the authorizing party to decide whether or not to delegate or not, and in effect, you have focused on the process.

From the point of view of managerial behavior, planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling are all carried out on a process, where only planning and control are associated with outcomes. The plan should set a target result, and the control will feed back to the process based on the results. Therefore, we can even think that management itself is a process, and it is absolutely impossible to manage with the behavior of "only looking at the result, not looking at the process".

Focusing only on the results, regardless of the process" is an excuse for managers to lack process management capabilities. Because of the personal abilities of managers, they don't know how to manage the process, so "only looking at the results, not the process" becomes a good excuse for managers to ignore the process.

<>Perhaps, managers will think that managers do not need to know everything, and it is impossible to know everything, but as a manager, you need to understand the process from the requirements of management and grasp the process, especially those processes that are crucial to the development of the enterprise. Some managers may say that there is so much to do that they don't have the energy and time to manage the process. This is a typical management capability problem.

Managers need to learn time management and delegation, spend time on critical and important things, and do things efficiently. Many lazy managers, "only look at the results, do not consider the process" naturally becomes a good excuse for him to ignore the process, here there are both the laziness of the manager and the consideration of the irresponsible process. Therefore, "only looking at the results, not the process" is not only a matter of attitude of managers, but also a matter of responsibility and responsibility of managers.

This statement is very inaccurate, if a manager only looks at the results and not the process, then he must not be a good manager. Managers do not have the ability to manage the process, including the energy and time to manage the process.

No; This kind of management is very detrimental to the unity of the team, and may lead to a lack of cohesion.

BecauseprocessIn the exercise of youofIt is particularly important to be able to argue in terms of power, and to put you outadministrativePeople come togetherThis process does notIt can be successful overnightof。"Just look at the results, regardless of the process" is also a way of thinking, management and management skills for many managers; There are good and bad ways of managing this way, and it is suitable for different leaders!

A true manager should be a well-rounded manager. Managers can focus not only on the results, but also on the process, its implementation, and every process under control.

<> should focus not only on this year's results, but also on last year's results, weigh the differences between the two, whether it is the improvement in the quality of work or the duplication of work processes, and consider and improve the results of next year's work. It is necessary not only to review the work results of the unit, but also to compare the work results of other units with whether they reach the common level of the industry.

Through the vertical and horizontal comparison of work results, to measure the management level of the unit, this is the real sense of the manager's comprehensive management pursuit. Doing business is not to create jobs, but among the customers who do business, the company has its own corporate values, contacts potential customers through various channels, and provides deep and good service to its target customers from the inside out, so that customers can output and pay for the value of the enterprise, and serve you, instead of one or two customers, it is a multi-type customer, and then through the enterprise value chain to bring value, but a person can never do all the work, can only divide labor according to the entire business process, set up positionsThen, or Kuanlu hires professional skills and knowledge, and has a certain quality, through the division of labor and the refinement of cooperation, in a reasonable time and at a reasonable cost, to provide products and services that meet customer needs to create an exchange value behavior.

Do a detailed explanation of the problem for a detailed interpretation of the problem, I hope it will help you Qiaosui, if you have any questions, you can leave me a message in the comment area, you can comment with me more, if there is something wrong, you can also interact with me more, if you like the author, you can also follow me, your like is the biggest help to me, thank you. That's all for sharing, if you like me, please follow me. If you guys have anything to think.

Real managers are not like this, everyone will not necessarily have a good result when they work hard, so the process is also very important to prepare for difficulties, such a practice is also unreasonable, it is very unfair for employees, and it will also make employees suffer a lot of grievances. Imitation collapse.

Real managers will also do this process, and if the process of the nuclear veteran can be more in line with their own wishes, then the result will be very good, and the result is not particularly important. This is not a reasonable practice for special booklets, and it will also affect the development of the workplace.

Yes. Plausible. Otherwise, it will waste their time, which is not appropriate.

For the quality of the work conclusion, we should not only pay attention to the conclusion of 2022, but also pay attention to the conclusion of the previous year, weigh the difference between the two conclusions, whether it is the improvement of the quality of the work, or the repetition of the whole process of work, and at the same time think about and improve the effect of the work in the next year. It is not only necessary to verify the work conclusions of the department, but also to complete the comparison with the results of other departments, and whether it is to compete with the industry.

of the same level. Based on the vertical and horizontal comparison of the work conclusions, the management method of the department is considered.

The level of work, which is a real manager's overall management approach to the pursuit of perfection. On the field of incumbents, an outstanding manager should not only focus on the completion of the work conclusion, but also pay more attention to the completion of each whole process.

In the establishment of each whole process, the pursuit of perfect quality of each whole process, deal with the existing deficiencies, eliminate the unscientific stage, the whole process to ensure the most effective, the most effective. Sometimes, the required effect of the work is produced, but it is possible that the whole process of the work is not necessarily the most effective, the most effective, the most energy-saving and environmentally friendly. Only when the whole process of optimal control is produced will the most effective conclusions be produced.

Being a company is not a game of playing house, there is no conclusion or inconvenience is not responsible, or the inconvenience is not scientific, the subordinates carry it out casually, and then report it. In many cases, the goal setting is set at a level that can only be carried out by the subordinates reaching out and getting it, and it is not easy to obtain within the scope of the subordinates' level. At the same time, I think everyone has a misunderstanding about this sentence:

Only look at the effect, don't look at the whole process, focus on the necessity of the conclusion, and Wang Zao is not the whole process at all, <>

If you as a manager, you only have to receive the overall goal of the company to let you send, and then assigned to the matching subordinates, just wait for the subordinates to take the conclusion home, if the subordinates do not need you to learn training and specific guidance, and even do not need to you network resources, it can be completed immediately, or the overall goal is very simple, or it is inconvenient for the enterprise to put a cat and a dog to sit on your part, this overall goal can be carried out, why do you want to be a manager? This is equivalent to the fact that the company is close to the "monopoly" in the sales market - the customer wants to cooperate with you very much, and maybe the sales market is a company that has a unique ability to achieve customer value. But in today's market environment, do you think it's realistic?

If the manager only looks at the conclusion, then it is necessary to set a variety of established data and information task index values, and the rest are handed over to the subordinates to do a good job, and if they do a good job, they will be used and rewarded, and if they can't do it, they will be punished or resigned. Which company have you ever seen a manager do this? Therefore, it is not necessary to think about "whether to look at the conclusion", yes or no, without simple mechanical equipment, so that you can understand what factors are involved in the key work of management methods.

It is not possible for you to understand the meaning and essence of management methods.

No, the process is also very important, the process determines the development of an enterprise, determines whether an enterprise can retain talents.