The difference between robbery and snatching, the difference between snatching and robbery

It's basically the same. It's just that I feel that "grabbing" is better than "grabbing" Sven points

There is a difference. It is 6 strokes.

The robbery is 7 strokes. Snatch the duo four tones.

Snatch the thought qiang three times.

Legal Analysis: The difference between robbery and robbery: 1. The social harm is different.

Robbery infringes on personal rights and property rights, and is very harmful to society. The social harm of robbery is mainly reflected in the infringement of property rights, and the social harm is less than that of robbery. 2. The target of violence is different.

The robber acts on the victim (including psychologically) through violent attacks, threats or other means, so that the victim does not dare to resist, so as to achieve illegal possession of property. The object of the violent act of snatching is the property, and the snatcher often takes advantage of the unpreparedness of others, openly exercises violence against the property, and illegally takes possession of the property before it has time to resist. 3. The standards for crime are different.

Robbery is considered a crime as long as it is a robbery, while robbery generally requires a large amount of money to be criminalized.

Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 274:Where public or private property is extorted, the amount is relatively large or there are multiple extortions, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given.

Article 263:Whoever robs public or private property by violence, coercion or other means is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and a concurrent fine; In any of the following circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment, life imprisonment or death is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given:

1) Entering a home to rob a house;

2) Robbery on public transport;

3) Robbery of banks or other financial institutions;

4) Multiple robberies or robberies where the amount of money involved is huge;

5) Robbery causing serious injury or death;

6) Pretending to be a member of the military or police to commit a robbery;

7) Robbery with firearms;

8) Looting military supplies or emergency rescue, disaster relief, or relief materials.

1. What is the difference between snatching and robbery.

1. The difference between snatching and robbery is:

1) The object of the infringement is different. The object of the crime of snatching is a simple object, that is, the ownership of public and private property;

2) The performance of the criminal's view of the offender is different. The crime of robbery is the blatant seizure of property without using coercive methods such as violence or coercion, while the crime of robbery is when the perpetrator uses violence, coercion or other means to force the victim to hand over his belongings or directly rob the property;

3) The requirements for the consequences of the crime are different. The crime of robbery does not require the amount of property, but the amount of property required to be seized to constitute the crime of robbery is relatively large;

4) The content of subjective intent is different. The crime of robbery is committed by the perpetrator in the hope that the victim will not be able to resist or be unable to resist, while the crime of robbery is carried out with the intention of obtaining the property suddenly, in the hope of obtaining the property while the victim is unprepared, rather than in the hope of forcing the victim to lose the property through force and intimidation.

2. Legal basis: Article 263 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China.

Robbery] Whoever robs public or private property by violence, coercion or other means is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years and a concurrent fine; In any of the following circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment, life imprisonment or death is to be given, and a concurrent fine or confiscation of property is to be given:

1) Entering a home to rob a house;

2) Robbery on public transport;

3) Robbery of banks or other financial institutions;

4) Multiple robberies or robberies where the amount of money involved is huge;

5) Robbery causing serious injury or death;

6) Pretending to be a member of the military or police to commit a robbery;

7) Robbery with firearms;

8) Looting military supplies or emergency rescue, disaster relief, or relief materials.

2. What are the standards for filing a case for the crime of snatching the first person and reforming the remaining robbery?

1. The perpetrator has the purpose of illegally taking possession of public or private property, and has carried out acts of illegal possession or intent to illegally occupy it.

2. The perpetrator used violence, coercion, or other methods against the victim on the spot.

2) Objective elements. This offence is objectively manifested in the theft or snatching of official documents, documents or seals of the armed forces. (3) Subject elements.

The subject of this crime is a general subject, that is, a natural person who has reached the age of 16 and has the capacity for criminal responsibility, and this crime can be constituted. It can be both military and non-military. (4) Subjective elements.

The offence must be subjectively motivated by intent, i.e. with the intent to steal or snatch documents, documents and seals knowing that they are the official documents, documents and seals of the armed forces. Negligence does not constitute this crime. If the theft or robbery is made without knowing that it is an official document, certificate, or seal, it cannot constitute this crime, but it may constitute another crime, such as theft, robbery, etc.

This crime is objectively manifested in the act of snatching and stealing state-owned archives. The so-called snatching refers to the act of openly seizing or snatching state-owned archives in front of the person in the presence of the custodian or holder of the state-owned archives. The so-called theft refers to the act of secretly taking all the state's archives by means that they think they will not be discovered by the state-owned archives managers and holders.

It can be stolen in front of them, or they can be stolen in the place where the file is stored when the file keeper or user is not present. This crime is a selective offence and is constituted as long as the perpetrator commits one of the acts. That is, if only the act of snatching archives is committed, it constitutes the crime of snatching archives; Where only the act of stealing archives is carried out, the crime of stealing archives is constituted.