-
In fact, variety shows have insiders and scripts, although they are brought to the table to compete, but it is not good for anyone to lose, in the final analysis, it is the power and connections under the stage that fight, and it has little to do with strength.
-
That's because the audience votes based on their favorite stars, not on how well they perform on stage and how strong they are?
-
Because most of the audience at the scene are fans, famous people naturally have more fans, but some powerful players happen to have less fans, so people with high strength are eliminated.
-
The composition of the live audience is a key factor in influencing the results. Whoever has more fans will get more votes, which is actually unfair. The powerful young lady was eliminated because she didn't have so many fans, which is a pity.
-
It may be because the live effect is not the same as the effect presented by TV, so the choice of the live audience and the TV audience is different. It may also be that the show has a dark box operation that we don't know about, which is hard to say.
-
In this show, the audience votes to judge the performance of the sisters, which has no reference valueIn my eyes, my sister's on-site voting is the secret manipulation of the results by the program team, how can the program team eliminate people with super high topics, so it's good to skip over when the results are displayed when watching the show.
-
I think some sisters' votes are still quite watery, for example, Xu Fei's votes have been seriously questioned, I think this vote is only used as a reference, not as a standard.
-
I think it's very watery because some sisters who originally had a lot of strength were eliminated with very low votes, and if anyone in the audience has more fans, then she may have more votes, rather than looking at personal strength.
-
I don't think it's too watery, but I still have to respect the vote on the spot. Because after all, the feeling of watching the game at the scene and watching the game on the online platform is different, and everyone's preferences are also different.
-
The broadcast of "Sister Riding the Wind and Waves" has become one of the most hotly discussed variety show talent shows this summer, this show breaks the rules of many traditional program drafts, take the rules of program voting, "Sister" is to choose to vote for 500 viewers in the venue, these 500 votes will directly determine the win or loss of each performance stage, and then 500 viewers will vote again for the ranking of the sisters of the audience's favorite, and this ranking also directly determines the stay of the sisters on the scene, So every vote counts count, so why did the show choose to vote on the spot and refuse to vote outside the venue? There are several reasons for this:
Clause. 1. Say goodbye to the results of traffic decisions. If a voting channel is set up outside the venue, it is unfair to some sisters who lack a fan base, you must know that some of the sisters of this show are still active in various programs, with their own traffic and popularity, and some have already returned to their families and do not participate in business activities much.
Clause. 2. Refuse to counterfeit water tickets. Nowadays, many talent shows will set up off-site voting channels, and some water army companies have come into being, these companies usually carry out vote-brushing behavior, and the number of votes is ranging from millions to tens of millions, which seriously affects the fairness of the program.
Clause. 3. Put forward higher requirements for the strength of the sisters. The biggest difference between the on-site audience and the off-site audience is that the pictures of the off-site audience** are post-processed, while the on-site audience sees the real picture.
And through the ** on the scene, I can feel which sister's strength is stronger, aside from the sound repair and filter, I can better see the real strength of the players, and the number of votes obtained in this way is well deserved.
The program "Sister Riding the Wind and Waves" is about to enter the finals in the expectation of many people, although it is not sure whether the finals will insist on on-site voting, but I believe that the sisters will show their best strength no matter what.
-
Because the people who voted on the spot could see the direct performance, all the votes were in the field.
-
Off-site voting is easy to fake, and on-site voting is more intuitive. Like the resurrection here after the off-the-field vote who can be eliminated, according to some people, some sisters have fraudulent votes. On-site voting is controllable by the program group, while off-site voting has too many variables.
-
Because the off-site voting relies on the traffic of the sisters, it is not very fair, and there are fake water votes.
The "soft advertising" in the Spring Festival Gala includes oral broadcasting, congratulatory telegrams, subtitles and other forms, compared with hard advertising, soft advertisements are mostly gifted, such as such a price list in the industry, in the 2009 Spring Festival Gala, the amount of more than 10 million yuan of enterprises, will be presented with the Spring Festival Gala "congratulatory telegram list" congratulatory telegram. In addition, 100,000 yuan of advertising sponsorship in exchange for a live broadcast ticket, and 4 million yuan of advertising investment won the honor of the round table VIP, which is the hidden ticket issued by the Spring Festival Gala to enterprises**. >>>More
The professional judges evaluate the presentation effect of the entire show, and the on-site public voting can only rely on popularity to vote or fans to vote for their sisters. Of course, in the live ** show, the audience at the back of the seat can only watch their favorite sister through the big screen.
Ran Shaoping, male, from Shenzhen. Lives in Beijing.
He has been sitting in the audience for 11 years, and he has been nicknamed "the most smiling brother of the audience in the Spring Festival Gala" by netizens. >>>More
Where a party alone does not constitute a crime by destroying or fabricating evidence, if their own conduct constitutes a crime, it is to be given a heavier punishment as a sentencing circumstance. If there is help from others, it constitutes the crime of aiding in the destruction of evidence or the crime of destroying or fabricating evidence by the defender or the litigant.
The first part of yeswuyong said is right, the material of the bypass tube is determined by the medium and not by the instrument, but I think the latter is not correct, the electromagnetic wave of the guided wave radar is propagated along the guided wave rod (cable), the radar wave will not diverge outward, the diameter of the bypass tube can be measured if it meets the requirements, whether it is a plastic or metal bypass tube can be used guided wave radar; The electromagnetic wave emission of non-contact radar (that is, the horn type) has a certain angle and is a divergent wave, while the dielectric constant of plastic material is generally very low, and the radar wave can easily pass through the plastic pipe wall to cause energy loss and even produce an wrong echo signal, so the non-contact radar must be installed in the metal bypass tube.