T1600 and T4200 integrated graphics how much difference there is between running photoshop

Look at how you use it.,If you use the latest version of CS4,Can't deal with the big **,Your two computers are really strange and can't find it.,If it's not for mobile use, it is recommended that the same price can be matched with desktop performance can be doubled.,Lie to you and my puppy.。 If you must use a notebook, it is recommended that there are a lot of independent displays within 5000rmb.,The model is not copied lazy.,You can go to the official website to check it.。。 Also, when you buy a computer, don't tell him that it is used to make ps, and the merchant will not fool you.

Let's give you a model number and take a look. ASUS X8AIN,5000 or so,I don't regret buying a machine,No matter how low the configuration suggestion is, don't buy it with a year to spend the second year hidden, and you cry。

About 3000 of this book to watch a movie and listen to the song.,Other things are not what it does.。。。 Honestly telling you that computers are being phased out faster than anything else, it's a bit nagging, but trust me.

Photoshop even works on my 9-year-old computer. It mainly depends on what kind of photo you make, if you cut more than 1 meter of canvas. Then you need to have enough memory and CPU.

Generally, if there are a few photos of more than a dozen ordinary digital cameras, any graphics card can be used, and it mainly occupies memory and CPU resources when transferring in batches. I used to use a dual-core 2G memory computer to open 300 more than 500K **, it took a minute and a half!

To be honest, the difference will not be big, and PS does not have high requirements for the configuration of the computer.

PS mainly depends on the memory that occupies a large amount of memory, and the graphics card does not have high requirements.

There is no problem playing these all, it will be a little better with the XP system.

If you use GMA X3100 and T3400, of course, it is better.

OK. It's just that the rendering will be slow.

That's what my machine is now.

It used to be 512 memory, and the day before yesterday I just changed to a 1G that can be played.

Just a little slower.

The gap is still very big,T4200 is the Penryn core,And T1600 is the MEROM core,At the same time,T4200 not only has a more advanced core architecture,And the main frequency is also higher,Support more instructions,T4200Support instructions,T1600Only support SSE3 instructions,Core architecture and instruction support are the main factors that determine CPU performance,T4200The performance can be compared with the mid-to-high-end core of the MEROM core2 dual-core called board, And the T1600 is just a low-end Celeron dual-core of the MEROM core, so you can see the gap between the two.

Dear users, according to your description, we suggest you take a look at the following information:

It is an upgraded version of the Besturn dual-core T3200 (, the main frequency has not changed, it is still the same, the front-side bus has been upgraded to 800MHz, the manufacturing process has been upgraded to 45 nanometers, the core has been upgraded to the Penryn core, and it has been upgraded to a multi-** instruction set.

It is Intel both launched the low-end T1400, T1500 two Celeron dual-core after another dual-core processor belonging to the Celeron series, its overall parameters1MB of L2 cache than the previous T1400, T1500 512KB more than double, and T2000 series of Pentium dual-core, but the software clearly shows the words "T1600". T1600 is higher than the previous two products,These two products are not a grade,Specific suggestions you can go to Intel's official ** to see it。 We hope you find the above reply helpful. Intel is wonderful because of you!

Do I need to compare this with dizziness?

The former is much stronger than the latter in any parameter.

The former process is 45nm and the latter is 65nm

The former is the main frequency, and the latter.

The former has a front-side bus of 800 and the latter has a 667

It's just that the T4200 was smashed, and it is estimated that there is more sand than the T1600.

It's not a level, the core architecture of the former is the same as Intel Core, and the latter is Intel's lowest-grade Celeron. Intelt 4200 has comparable CPU performance to many Cores.

Celeron processor T1600 frequency. Bus.

T1600 Frequency Bus 533 65nm

Celeron itself is the first level above Pentium. In addition, the main frequency and bus are lower, and T4200 is not the same grade. Performance is at least half as poor.

It must be 4200, and the price must be much worse.

Almost....It's not necessarily good to pay too much attention to the parameters...There are also many problems such as motherboards, memory, hard disks, heat dissipation, etc....

The Besturn dual-core T4200 is good, and it is much better, Celeron is the lowest-end product, do you understand this, the difference is that the Besturn dual-core T4200 has strong performance! Another weak!

In terms of performanceT4200 must be better,But T1600Compared with the current use, it is enough,After all, the graphics card performance of the notebook is relatively weak,Both can be satisfied from office and daily applications,Comment from the game,If there is no notebook equipped with a separate graphics cardT4200The performance of the whole machine will not be much better than T1600。

The T4200 is the latest architecture, a little bit stronger than the T5800 and slightly inferior to the T6400

The T1600 is much worse.

The Pentium is a little better, it is recommended by experts, and medium games can be played

Of course, the T4200 is faster than the previous 2.

Celeron M540 is a single-core (little eunuch).

Celeron T1600 is a dual-core (eunuch).

The Pentium T4200 is dual-core (men).

Of course, the T4200 has a higher clock speed and a larger L2 cache than the previous one (the performance of the Core architecture is directly related to the L2 cache).

The above CPUs can meet your learning requirements, but for future needs, it's best not to let your laptop performance lag behind, so choose the T4200 or better Core series!

T4200 is good,But**Compared with the previous two, it is much more expensive,If it is for home use, it is recommended to buy a 1600 is enough,Look at the movie and play small games enough to deal with,T4200 belongs to the mid-range processor and is now more used in the book of about 4000,T1600's generally** are about 3000。

The third one is the best. The first one is single-core. The second is Celeron Dual. The third is the Pentium dual-core.

The Pentium T4200 is good, but it is also expensive.

There is no best or worst, only the best for you.

Even if your machine is the most high-end of the directory users (it should be assembled in 20,000 or 30,000), you don't play large-scale single-player virtual games, and high-end online games (those that can't be downloaded or downloaded online) are fine.

If you want to say good, even if the CPU is good, it depends on the motherboard.

To put it simply, the T4200 is good, with millions of seconds of results.

It is clear that the plug and Ben are not in the same class, and of course the T4200