Does the Great Wall turbocharger have high fuel consumption in the later stage?

Updated on Car 2024-05-15
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Hello, the Great Wall turbocharger will not consume a lot of fuel in the later stage! Diesel engine turbocharging is relatively stable, fuel consumption in the later stage is basically unchanged, gasoline engine turbocharging is not fuel-efficient in the early stage, and it will increase slightly in the later stage! [If you have a problem with the car, ask the car master.]

    4S shop professional technician, 10 minutes to solve. 】

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Fuel consumption will increase.

    The power source of mechanical supercharging is directly driven by the engine, so mechanical supercharging itself consumes engine power, while discarded turbocharging does not consume engine power, so discarded turbocharging is more economical.

    But the installation of a supercharging system is not such a simple thing, there are many accessories to be installed, such as intercoolers, etc., but also need to be matched with the engine, the most important point is that the installation of supercharging will increase the combustion load of the engine, produce a lot of heat, if it exceeds the heat dissipation capacity of the original engine, it is possible to burn out the engine. The installation of this thing is actually not reliable at all, not to mention the small displacement, the automobile manufacturer for this small displacement engine almost does not use mechanical supercharging, small displacement is not suitable for mechanical supercharging.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Hello, this is not big, you can rest assured and happy with your question.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    As long as it's not broken, it's not big [There is a problem with the car, ask the car master.] 4S shop professional technician, 10 minutes to solve. 】

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Hello, yes, such as Haval H6, it is more fuel-intensive in the later stage. I hope mine satisfies you, and I wish you a happy car [If you have a problem with the car, ask the car master. 4S shop professional technician, 10 minutes to solve. 】

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The fuel consumption of the engine is not necessarily related to whether the old sales are turbocharged, and the theoretical fuel consumption depends more on whether the engine technology is advanced. Of course, the engine with the same displacement, with turbocharging, must be more fuel-intensive, for example, with the naturally aspirated engine, under the same conditions, it must be higher than the naturally aspirated engine, because when the turbo intervenes, it can be regarded as a naturally aspirated engine with simple keys, and the fuel consumption is naturally higher than that of the naturally aspirated engine.

    Car reviewer: Zhong Zhirong].

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    At the same displacement, turbocharging is more fuel-intensive. After supercharging, more air enters the combustion chamber, and in order to ensure the ratio of air to fuel (air-fuel ratio), the amount of fuel injected will also increase, so fuel saving is not the job of turbocharging.

    Under the same displacement conditions, the turbocharged engine can output higher torque and power than the natural suction, the power has been released, and the tax on displacement will also dive. This is one of the advantages of turbocharging, especially in the context of today's increasingly stringent emission standards.

    Another advantage is the highland area, where naturally aspirated models tend to experience a noticeable drop in power due to their thin air.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The fuel consumption of the engine is not necessarily related to whether there is turbocharging, and the theoretical fuel consumption depends more on whether the engine is technologically advanced. Of course, the engine with the same displacement, with turbocharging, must consume more fuel, for example, with the naturally aspirated engine, under the same conditions, it must be higher than the fuel consumption of the naturally aspirated engine, because when the turbo intervenes, it can be regarded as a naturally aspirated engine, and the fuel consumption is naturally higher than that of the naturally aspirated engine.

    Car reviewer: Zhong Zhirong].

Related questions
6 answers2024-05-15

Turbocharging increases the air intake to improve the car's power, and the increase in power obviously increases fuel consumption. However, when two engines with the same displacement do the same power, the fuel consumption of the engine with turbocharging is smaller. Buick cars are all oil tigers, and if you want to save fuel, you have to think about it. >>>More

13 answers2024-05-15

The principle of turbocharging.

Turbocharging is to install a turbine in the exhaust manifold and an impeller in the intake manifold. Both wheels are the same on the same axle. >>>More

18 answers2024-05-15

The maintenance cost of turbocharging is indeed higher than that of natural aspiration, and the oil needs to be used well

12 answers2024-05-15

Hello, the same model, the same displacement of the engine, turbocharged fuel consumption is lower than naturally aspirated.

13 answers2024-05-15

Some. For example, Highlander.

A turbocharged engine is an engine that relies on a turbocharger to increase the air intake of the engine, and the turbocharger (turbo) is actually an air compressor. It uses the exhaust gas from the engine as the power to push the turbine in the turbine chamber (located in the exhaust duct), and the turbine drives the coaxial impeller to be located in the inlet tract, and the impeller compresses the fresh air sent by the air filter duct and then sends it into the cylinder. When the engine speed is accelerated, the exhaust gas discharge speed and the turbine speed are also accelerated, the degree of air compression can be increased, and the air intake of the engine will be increased accordingly, and the output power of the engine can be increased. >>>More