Ask someone for help!! SONY W150, Fujifilm FinePix J150w, Samsung i100, these three digital models a

Fujifilm Finepix J150W is good, wide-angle and cheap.

Cons: No stabilization.

Samsung i100: built-in lens.

Sony W150

Merchant**: 1109 to 1780

FUJIFILM J150 MERCHANTS**: 874 to 1400

Samsung i100 (Samsung i100) merchants**: 1339 to 1800

Fujifilm Sony W150 looks good but the cost performance is not very high, Samsung's has no advantages, the imaging level is terrible, and some professional brands are not comparable. Fuji's is very good, imaging ***, cost-effective. I've been working on digital cameras recently.,I'm about to look at Zhongguancun** It's all bad.,I'm also more in the picture of the Fuji you said.,I'm more inclined to J150W.,I hope to give you some help.。

The J150 is a bit more cost-effective, with 10 million pixels and a 28mm wide angle. And the color of the Fujinon lens is still very commendable.

Sony's W series machines are on the expensive side, and the cost performance is not good. I've used the W170, which is also a card player compared to my Panasonic, and I personally don't think the quality of the Carl Zeiss lens is actually particularly memorable. But the appearance is still okay.

As for the A480, it has just been launched, the pixels are so high, but the CCD size has not been improved, and it will be unpleasant to use. It is not recommended to buy.

The price you give shows that you need a moderate and affordable model, and I recommend the J150It's affordable.

If it were me, I would choose the Sony W150.

Fujifilm J150WIt's not that I prefer Fuji, it's because Fuji has an advantage in terms of function.

Sony don't have to think about it, the habitual shutter speed is slow.

In terms of cost performance, the water Olympus 1040 is slightly cheaper than Fuji J25, dozens of dollars, but in terms of my personal image quality, I prefer J25

As for Samsung's digital camera, it has always been questioned that its image quality is not much better than that of a mobile phone.

Sony's W150 is also good at cost performance, but the camera is a little clumsy in the card machine, and the use of memory sticks and other machines using SD cards is slightly more alternative, and the versatility is not good.

So these are the first to recommend Fujifilm J25 followed by Sony's W150, which has good picture quality, and then Olympus 1040 and Samsung's.

If you think about the appearance, the J25 and Olympus 1040 are both good, beautiful and small**, and affordable! Parallel goods can be done for about 900 yuan!

Based on the above opinions, you can make your own choice, I hope my suggestions can help you!

If it's about performance, it's still Sony's.

Fuji J25, first of all, in terms of quality, Sony's things personally feel bad, and the accessories are very expensive; Samsung's imaging quality is really average, and the landlord can compare it. As far as the brand is concerned, I prefer Fujifilm, and my own camera is Fujifilm's S1000FD, which is good for money and has good image quality.

W170, of course.

W170, 10 million pixels, 5X light change, 1-inch CCD, 28mm wide angle, very complete functions 1750

W150, 8 million pixels, 5X optical change, 1-inch CCD, very complete 1600

W150 and W170 The price difference is very small,Relatively speaking,W170 is more cost-effectiveJ150W doesn't need to be considered,Fuji's machine has always had high parameters,But the actual picture quality is not good,And J150W parameters are slightly lower than W170。

I feel that Fuji's picture is fake, and I can't say it, so you can see it for yourself.

Sony W150 and 170 differ in pixels, and wide angle. 8 million pixels is actually enough for the average person, and I think the wide-angle function is better, especially when you take family photos, you can shoot a wider space than ordinary cameras.

It's the Canon Ixus 80is, not Olympus.

Canon, Sony, and Samsung are the world's four largest digital camera manufacturers. It is better to believe in authority than to believe in the market, what if Canon's technology does not exist, Samsung and Sony are not bad.

Imaging-wise:

The Samsung i8 is clearly inferior to the i100.

The i100 periscope is theoretically inferior to the Sony W150 and Canon 80

The Sony W150 and the Canon 80 should be in between, the Canon 80 is slightly better, and the difference will not be big.

I also use the i100, which is also very good, and the shape is 8 wrong. The imaging is also very good. If you're not a professional, you won't be able to tell the difference in imaging.

It's all double image stabilization, optical image stabilization + high sensitivity image stabilization.

The color imaging of these machines is not basically indistinguishable from professionals.

The night view Canon is better, and Olympus basically can't find the night view.

W150 is more expensive and not cost-effective.

The i8 camera is good-looking, versatile, cost-effective, and the optical zoom lens is hidden.

i100 pixels are high, the function is similar to i8, and all of them are suitable for Samsung's lens, and there is basically no difference in color imaging.

I just bought the i8 I used, Xi'an 1700, get a 2g card and a brand battery.

Choose Fuji Land This machine is the best out of the three you said.

Fujifilm Finepix J150W is good!

Sony S950

Coming soon. It's not on the market yet, so how can you judge whether it's good or bad?

Keep saving up for better ones.

The low-end is the low-end, and it is still not good to take pictures, and it is estimated that you will regret it if you buy it.

The Sony DSC-S950, of course

Sony's brand, well-known!

Canon E1

Merchant**: 1120 to 1485

Effective pixels: 10 million.

Optical zoom: 4x.

Equivalent to 35:35-140

Display ruler: inches.

Image stabilization: Optical image stabilization.

I recommend the Canon A2000, because I use this one now, and it comes standard with 1370 when I buy it, which is not a card machine, it is bulky, and it is not very good-looking! If you look at the performance Canon A2000 absolutely nothing to say!

The important thing is that you like it.