Ask the economists for help

That's the economics problem? Textbooks are so stupid, who would solve a practical problem in just one way?

**Broker's commission.

Nannies are engaged in housework.

The brokerage fee paid when buying an old car.

Produce 1 million yuan of products and sell 1.2 million yuan.

A and B do housework for each other, A should pay $350 to B, and B should pay A $300, and after negotiation, A only pays B $50;

Used goods and old things ** The part of the value added is included.

Direct taxes are not included in indirect taxes.

The last 200,000 to buy a house at a later date when selling minus 200,000 and the remaining money is incorporated.

Your brother is a partner and should receive a share of the partnership property in accordance with the partnership agreement.

Two aspects to solve: first, first of all, to determine the contractual relationship between your brother and his friend at that time, if there is an employment contract, then naturally there is no problem, but if there is no contract, then your brother may lack evidence to claim payment, then, in this case, you need to consider the second option, that is, whether to report to the relevant tax department that his friend may be exempt from taxes, of course, this will not necessarily be any benefit to your brother, However, it can avoid the problem of being implicated because his friend's company may have violated the law, but the premise is that it must be confirmed whether your brother is indeed the legal representative of the company.

The above opinions are for reference.

Q: Go downstairs People said that it was a company, why does it have partners? Partnership agreement?

Without a legal basis, the law will not support: tax avoidance is illegal!

There are different types of bonds, including state bonds, corporate bonds, and other bonds. Creditors cannot all be the people, and in the necessary period, the state will act as the main culprit, and in the age of inflation, investing in anything is a loss, unless it buys value-preserving government bonds. There will always be measures in the country, after all, in our country, ** is generally not lost.

There is no incentive to buy, after all, the investment yield of the coarse dust national lead and local bonds is higher than the interest rate stored in ordinary banks, (and there is also an interest tax). You can issue more bonds, put them on the market, and let buyers take over. Isn't our country also buying a lot of American bonds?

The same is true.

Mo Dog 3

For example, today's $100 is not the same as tomorrow's $100, whether it is inflation or deflation, the interest paid is the difference to compensate for the creditor's liquidity loss.

Khan: I don't know how to explain it to you.

If you want to simply play the game, **There will be no income at all in the later stage All supported by personal taxes and tourism **In fact, it is only before 2030 You can increase your income by raising your personal tax and reducing your resource tax For details, you can go to the Super Strength 2 bar to see the strategy.

Currency doesn't really play a role in the game, and I haven't gotten anything to the point where the currency has happened, and the interest rate should not be too high, and raising the interest rate will lower the economy, and lowering the interest rate will raise the economy.

In view of the fact that the question you asked should not be answered by the first formula, after all, games are games, and sometimes the game system can get it wrong.

Hehe, it didn't help much, but it's not good to complicate something too much.

1. Yes.

2. There is a problem with this, it is export, and the negative is import.

4. The growth rate of resources and the income of money.

Personal experience: Inflation is not important, the state of the economy is more important.