Question about China s history U.S. s open door policy O O Thank you

1. The fundamental reason: the great powers at that time had entered the period of imperialism, and the colonialism of this period was characterized by the export of capital, as long as it could be opened, the use of local means of production in our country could obtain huge benefits, and the trend of the world at that time was democratic independence, and the British colonies began to become independent on a large scale after World War I.

2. Written answer: You forgot that there is a very important evaluation of the results of the Boxer Rebellion and the Battle of the Eight-Nation Alliance, to the effect that "it is impossible for any major power to monopolize China or directly carve up this large country with a population of 400 million."

3. Hidden reason: The open door policy was proposed by the United States, and the strength of the United States at that time was not a first-class power, even if it was carved up, it was the old European powers such as Britain and France that had the advantage, and the United States could not take any advantage.

4. The reason that is not in the textbook: Beiyang ** is not as faceted as it is said in the history books, and I don't know how to fight it. If you are interested, you can take a look at the works of historians such as Yuan Weishi from another perspective.

First: Although China was relatively backward at that time, it was a big country after all, and it had to pay a heavy price if it wanted to carve up China; Second, the different development of the imperialist powers leads to different emphases of their interests in China, and Tsarist Russia, a country with relatively slow capitalist development, naturally focuses on China's territory

Emerging countries like the United States, on the other hand, are more focused on economic interests. Third: there are also differences in the military strength of the imperialist powers, and the distribution of interests after the partition of China lies largely in the comparison between military strength and economic strength, so for a country with strong economic strength like the United States, it is natural to ask for an "open door".

First of all, divide, not equally. At that time, the vested interests of various countries in China were large and small, and from the perspective of territory, it seemed that Russia occupied the largest area, but Russia's national strength was much worse than that of Britain, France and the United States at that time. Therefore, as the power of the great powers has grown and waned, the contradictions between them have also become acute.

If the great powers recognize the vested interests of their countries, it will hinder the plundering of the interests of the smaller ones by the big powers. Of course, for the small powers, it is of course best to maintain the status quo. When the United States intervened, China had basically been carved up, so he proposed to have equal interests, but because of the strength of the United States, the great powers had no choice but to accept it.

Second, at that time, the Chinese people had already awakened, the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, the Foreign Affairs Movement, the Restoration and Reform Movement, the Boxer Rebellion, Sun Yat-sen's Xingzhong Society had been established, and so on, all wanted the great powers to show the confidence and determination of the Chinese nation to stand up. If the fact of partition is turned into a substantive territory of a sovereign or exclusive nature, it will become the target of public criticism.

Therefore, direct partition is impossible to achieve equal interests under the general situation of sharp contradictions and conflicts between various powers in China and the increasing awakening of the Chinese people.

Open Door Policy (1899).

1) Background: At the end of the 19th century, the United States ranked first in the world in terms of industrial output. The United States was busy with the Spanish-American War and missed the opportunity to fight for the partition of China, and needed to formulate a new China policy.

2) Content: No interference with any treaty, port or any vested interest. Goods from all countries will be subject to tariffs at the current rate of China**.

Each country in its own sphere of influence shall not impose a higher "equal opportunity" fee on the freight of ships and goods of other countries than its own.

3) Characteristics: "Equal interests".

4) Impact: It is a sign that the United States has entered a new stage of aggression against China, and since then the United States has no longer followed the Western powers in its China policy, but has an independent policy, stepping up and expanding the steps of aggression against China. As a result, the frenzy of carving up China set off by imperialism has temporarily achieved a superficial unanimity, and imperialism has formed an alliance to subjugate China to a certain extent.

As a result, the US influence in China has greatly increased, China's semi-colonization has been greatly deepened, and the national crisis has been unprecedentedly serious.

In the process of imperialist aggression against China, the United States lagged behind other imperialist countries, and in this case, the United States demanded to share power with other imperialist countries, so the United States demanded an "open door."

One of the reasons why the United States is doing it against China is actually to restrict or plunder our development.

The reason why the United States implemented an open door to China from 988 to 1949, he saw that China developed.

The reason why the United States opened its door to China may be because it was forced to do so out of pressure.

From 1899 to 1949, the United States opened its doors to China because of China's very large market.

Let China join the family of nations and make common progress, prosperity and strength.

The reason the United States opened its doors to China in 1988, 1899, and 1949 was because they began to take advantage of China.

From 1899 to 1949, the reason why the United States opened its doors to China was that the United States wanted to compete with other powers and further open up the Chinese market.

Oh, mainly to collect China's talents, capital and raw materials, and to open up external channels for American infrastructure.

The reason why the door is open to Watts is because we are a particularly powerful one.

Why did the United States open its doors to China from 1899 to 1949? Containment of the USSR.

Well, there are many reasons why the United States has opened its doors to China.

This implementation of opening up to China, of course, is that for the sake of interests, without interests, can he open up?

Their reason for opening up to implementation is that they want their economy to be better.

From 1899 to 1949, the reason why the United States opened its doors to China blindly was because it attracted talent and all kinds of capital.

The reason for the implementation of open doors is, of course, because of the mutually beneficial development of the two countries.

The reason why the vigilant approach here was not open was because many countries had already invaded China at that time.

The reason why the United States is opening its doors to Hoan Seok is to promote common development.

The background to the publication of this note was this: In the second half of 1900, the Boxer Rebellion had been suppressed by the Eight-Nation Alliance, China.

The Qing Dynasty had agreed that Prince Qing and Li Hongzhang would negotiate with the representatives of the Eight Nations in Beijing as plenipotentiaries. As a result, the countries that invaded China opened.

One is how to further control the Qing ** to prevent a movement like the Boxer Rebellion from happening again. As for what John Hymers mentioned.

The issue of equal opportunities in China and the preservation of China's territorial and administrative integrity has been put on the back burner and no one cares about it.

The open door policy mainly includes two contents: one is equal opportunity; The other is to keep it on.

territorial and administrative integrity of the country. The proposal of the "open door" policy is a sign of a new stage of US aggression against China. Since then, the United States has no longer followed the Western powers in its policy of aggression against China, but has developed an independent policy and has stepped up and expanded its steps to invade China.

The implementation of the "open door" policy of the United States did not affect the interests of the great powers, and therefore did not meet with the open opposition of the great powers, but on the contrary, the frenzy of carving up China set off by imperialism temporarily achieved a superficial unanimity. The imperialist alliance to subjugate China has been formed to a certain extent.

At the end of the 19th century, the United States proposed and adopted a policy of aggression against China, also known as the John Hymers policy. At the end of the 19th century, the United States failed to participate in the struggle for China's Gulf ports and "spheres of influence" because of the war with Spain over the Philippines. In September and November 1899, U.S. Secretary of State John Hydon sent a note to Britain, Germany, Russia, Japan, Italy, and other countries on the so-called "open door" and equal opportunity of China.

States do not interfere with each other's vested interests in China's "sphere of influence" or leased territories; The goods shipped by various countries to the ports in the sphere of influence shall be subject to tariffs by China** at the current tax rate; Within their sphere of influence, countries are not allowed to levy port taxes that are higher than those of their own ships and the laws of railway transportation of goods. Shortly thereafter, the United States sent another note to other countries, advocating that China's territorial and administrative integrity should be maintained, that all countries in China should be equal and just, and that the original policy of opening up "spheres of influence" and leased territories should be applied to the whole of China, forming an "open door" policy. �

"Open Door" indicates that the United States will no longer follow Britain's practice of invading China and put forward an independent China policy. Its essence is to enable the United States to share all the aggressive privileges obtained by other powers in China on the premise of recognizing the vested interests of the great powers in China.