Do you think Hu Shi said that classical Chinese is a kind of dead writing ?

I feel that this sentence is wrong, classical Chinese is not a dead language, we should take its essence and discard its dregs. This sentence alone does not conform to the Marxist outlook on literature and art.

No, classical Chinese is an applicable style in ancient times, and it is no longer applicable in modern times, but it is still of great value for us to study ancient documents and the living conditions of ancient people in modern times.

Judging from the historical background at that time, Hu Shi attacked classical Chinese so violently in order to promote vernacular literature at that time, which greatly promoted the spread of vernacular literature and played a positive role in history, so it was correct at that time.

I feel that the phrase "classical Chinese is a dead script" is taken out of context. Therefore, this is not in line with the historical materialist view of history.

First of all, this sentence alone is a lot of controversy, and Mr. Hu Shih's original intention is definitely not to let us give up the study of classical Chinese, but to let us adapt to the times and then go deeper to talk about the issue of literature and art.

Whether it is ancient or modern, this sentence is not too wrong, and this question, it is meaningless to use the current historical background to mislead everyone to think about this issue, because each sentence has its own historical background, and you cannot use the present to look at the time.

The ancients recorded that the carrier of information was rare items such as tortoise shells, bamboo slips, and silk, so it was necessary to strive for conciseness and express the richest connotation with the smallest words, which was the premise of the emergence of classical Chinese. With the development of society and technological progress, the emergence and continuous progress of papermaking and printing, especially in modern times, the above restrictions no longer exist, and the application of vernacular literature was born, so Hu Shi's words are reasonable. Of course, vernacular literature has only appeared for 100 years, and it is not comparable to classical Chinese, and vernacular literature still needs to work hard.

From the current point of view, our daily life is completely vernacular, but our culture pays attention to artistic conception, and then language and culture also pay attention to artistic conception, that is, the speech is capable and self-contained, so sometimes we will use fragments of classical Chinese to convey the meaning, so now, Hu Shi's sentence is just too extreme, and there is not much wrong with history.

As far as this sentence alone is concerned, combined with the era at that time, I feel that this sentence is right, it should be scrapped and welcome the new, but from the perspective of the 21st century, it is a bit biased.

Classical Chinese is the "recorder" of China's ancient splendid culture, and those articles are short and concise, and the words are beautiful, which have a great role in our study of ancient culture in modern times.

Classical Chinese, a classic of ancient culture, is more subtle and chewy than vernacular Chinese. The meaning of classical Chinese is profound, and every word is golden. The modern text is too white, and there are many long curves.

Now that human development is standing in the vernacular era to advocate culture, will our human vernacular narrative be replaced by another cultural symbol in the future, just as the human race first made the Great Seal pictographic culture was unified and reformed by the Qin Dynasty Cultural Background

The continuous culture and civilization of human beings and the material world, as a record of ancient Chinese history and culture, that is, it is inevitable that classical Chinese will become the history of human culture, and it will never be reused

Hu Shi often uses Zhao Yi's poems to explain that a dozen should change over time, how can it be immutable! He advocated vernacular literature to open the door of convenience for the general public, and Lu Xun also benefited from vernacular literature to stand firm in the literary world! ::

It may contain "eternal youth"!

The great Mr. Hu Shih, how many people in Chinese know him.

Hu Shi is a dead walking corpse!

Wrong. Classical Chinese itself is very obscure, especially in the past, when there were no broken sentences. The so-called "sentence reading" is to experience the meaning of the article by yourself and break the sentence by yourself.

Classical Chinese can be roughly divided into the following categories: records of historical events, literary works, enlightenment readings, and textbooks. Such as historical records, Han books, poems and songs, three hundred thousand (three-character classics, hundred family names, thousand-character texts), and Analects.

It plays an irreplaceable role in our understanding of history, the study of China's profound culture, the cultivation of children's character and the teaching of Chinese characters.

China has been up and down for 5,000 years, and it can be calculated how many origins the sons and daughters of China have formed with classical Chinese from the creation of Cangjie characters to the present People's Republic of China!

If we abandon classical Chinese, where is the history of China? Where will Chinese culture go from here? In the forest of the world, which is proud of its historical heritage, how can China stand on its footing?

Therefore, classical Chinese is not only the language used by the ancients, but also the memory of the ancestors of the Chinese children, the commemoration of history, and the respect for themselves.

The above is a personal opinion. Hope it works for you. o(∩_o~

Ancient Chinese is the crystallization of all the wisdom of ancient people, and it does not mean that you can learn Mandarin. Besides, you know a little bit of ancient Chinese, doesn't it make you seem to have a level of education! The ancients can put their enthusiasm into a poem, but also into some ancient articles, although you don't understand the surface, but once you explore deeply, you will find that the ancients are much smarter than us.

Because I want to show the world that I want to give up all my prejudices, but I also like to express the world's determination to fight Yuan Shikai to the end.

But today, when we go back and see, in fact, the classics have great value, and its thousand-year-old historical portrayal is worthy of our in-depth study and thinking.

No one can deny that this sentence is not exciting, "I am guilty of heavenly might, although I am far away, I will be punished!" "This is one of my favorites. "The Art of War", no one can deny its practical significance?