Why do some people say ridiculous things but can t refute them?

Maybe because he has more confidence in speaking, he can't think of how to refute him for a while, but if you have time to calm down and think about it, there will be a lot of words to refute him. <>

The Law of Value: When you own something, you find that it is not as valuable as you originally thought. The law of cooperation: what one person can do well in one hour, it takes two hours for two people. <>

Give someone a taste of their own medicine. Use the logic of the other party to deduce absurd results and let him see for himself. But this is only for people who have logic.

For nonsensical, block directly. And tell him that you are going to say the same thing to him, but you are just thinking about his feelings and are ready to stop.

This may only represent one kind of person, and that is a person with particularly poor self-control. If a person is really "close to Zhu is red, close to ink is black", then I really feel sorry for him, because he is too a failure, has no brains, no position, and is easily influenced by others.

For example, everyone says that respecting the old and loving the young is a virtue, but when we see those grandmothers on the road, we still dare not help them.

In life, the speaker is very ridiculous, in fact, there are many things that we have no way to refute, but when we refute, he happens to not believe us, so we can't say more.

The Law of Happiness: When you don't always wonder if you're happy, you're happy. The law of status: some people stand at the foot of the mountain, and some people stand on the top of the mountain, although they are in different positions, they are the same size in the eyes of the two people.

You are the beauty that I don't want to miss in my life, without you, all is just a will, and I don't want to settle. I didn't know how much I loved you now, but I will use everything I have to prove my love for you!

It seems that it is often like this, arguing with a person, obviously he is reasonable, but when he is asked by the other party, he can't reply. Why is he so dull, I can't refute the other party's ridiculous and wrong point of view only when I think of it afterwards.