The school stipulates that you can t enter the school for lunch break if you don t pay the food fee,

I think this is very unethical for the school to do. Schools are places where teaching and nurturing people. In itself, students come here to study for the sake of knowledge.

However, the school shows students that they are first and foremost imposing conditions on students in order to make money, rather than thinking about how to improve students' ability to learn knowledge.

Then this school is a bit inhumane, does not respect students, and forces students to pay fees, which will be controlled by the education department.

The school's approach is a bit excessive, and in this way it increases students' enthusiasm to pay for food, which obviously means that they are forced to buy and sell.

Day students have existed since ancient times. Although the child is small, he is also a Chinese citizen, and the adult works for half a day, and he wants to go home at noon, and the child is also tired of studying at school for half a day, so why does he not have the right to go home! Not to mention that it is extremely warm to go home and eat the meals that the family has made for themselves, it is a beautiful moment for the family to get together, how can the school deprive Chinese citizens of this right?

What's more, it's a small citizen like a child, it shouldn't be!

It should be, and possibly for safety reasons.

At present, due to the safety of students, schools have implemented fully closed teaching. When you are studying at school, you must abide by the rules of the school, and since you don't let your students go home to eat, don't go home to eat.

Summary. Hello dear first of all, I'm sorry for your question, if you don't follow the rules to eat in the cafeteria or don't queue up after school, then the children will become a mess of sand. It will also cause clusters of people to be injured, which is unimaginable and can even lead to bigger and more trouble.

What happens if students don't line up at the cafeteria or after school.

Hello dear, first of all, I am honored to ask your question, if you don't follow the rules to eat in the food comfort hall or don't line up after school, then the children will become a mess of sand. It will also cause a cluster of disturbances and injuries to people, which is unimaginable, and will even lead to greater and more trouble.

There are no rules, there is no circle, and if there is no order, everything will be chaotic, so you must obey order in public

I think there are pros and cons to this kind of regulation, but the advantages generally outweigh the disadvantages. The school does not let children move around in order to protect children's safety, so that children can better participate in learning, and do not let children be distracted from useless things other than studying. However, in a small way, such restraint will also make the child's physical condition worse and worse, and lack some of the exercise required for outdoor activities.

Many primary and secondary schools today do have mandatory regulations that students are not allowed to go out of the classroom except for going to the toilet during recess and lunch breaks, and this system has been around for a long time. From the starting point of the school, the school believes that students should learn, and things other than learning are meaningless, except for the normal physiological behavior of people, students should devote themselves to learning, which is the true meaning of the school. From the teacher's point of view, it is also good for the stability of the staff during class time that students do not run around.

To be honest, children at this age are indeed more lively and playful, but it is very unfortunate that children at this age have the heaviest learning tasks. Parents send their children to school so that students can learn in a good atmosphere. And it is understandable for children to go to the toilet during class time, and other chasing and slapping activities are useless and do not help with learning at all.

And then there's the fact that when these students get a little older, they run very fast and don't know how to play and play. If a student accidentally injures another classmate in the process of fighting, or accidentally falls down while fighting in the stairwell, the school will definitely bear some responsibility. Therefore, the school has made such a regulation to reduce the occurrence of accidents and ensure the safety of students, so this is an advantageous point.

But the only downside of this rule is that students have little time for outdoor exercise after students are banned from activities during recess and lunch breaks. In the long run, these students will generally be in poor health and will have weaker physical fitness, which is not conducive to comprehensive development. <>

So, I think there are pros and cons to this regulation, but there are more advantages.

I don't think there should be such a rule, between classes and lunch breaks, students should be free to relax, if they stay in the classroom all day and do not let students move, it is not good for students' physical and mental health.

No, because recess and lunch break are students' rest time, and without sufficient relaxation, they cannot devote themselves to learning.

The rules of elementary and middle schools prohibit students from leaving the classroom during recess and lunch breaks, and I think this behavior violates students' right to free movement, and it is easy to train students to become nerds, thus inhibiting their nature. I think the relevant schools should revoke this rule, so that children can live innocently and happily, and they should not only study at a young age.

Here's how I see it. This is definitely not right, it is equivalent to squeezing students' free time and leaving students without free activities.

I don't think it's necessary, you should be free to move around during breaks, and if you stay in the classroom all the time, the learning effect is not good.

In my opinion, this provision is very unreasonable. Primary and secondary school students love to move and play, and the mandatory regulations do not allow students to go out of the classroom, which simply stifles the students' active nature, which is to facilitate the management of the school. It's ridiculous.

This kind of regulation is completely an act of house arrest, and if the classrooms are not vacated, then why should the school build other facilities, isn't it a waste?

This rule is contrary to nature and can be counterproductive. How do you feel in the house for a day, children are already very tired from studying, and not letting them relax and let them stay in the house will only have the opposite effect.

Irrationality. If a student wants to go to the toilet, he or she has to hold it back, and I don't think it's reasonable.

I think this regulation is too unreasonable, and students don't even have basic personal freedom.

Measures for the Management of Food Hygiene in the Catering Industry.

Chapter 6 Hygienic Requirements for Restaurant Services and Takeaway Food.

Article 27: Restaurants and halls shall be kept clean and tidy, and the floor shall not be swept after the tableware is set or when there are customers dining, and the tableware shall be cleaned if it has not been used beyond the current dining time.

Article 28 When it is found or told by the customer that the food provided is indeed abnormal in sensory properties or suspicious deterioration, the restaurant service staff shall immediately remove the food and inform the relevant food preparation personnel at the same time. Meal preparers shall immediately inspect the food that has been replaced and similar food, and make corresponding treatments to ensure the safety and hygiene of the meal.

Article 29: When selling food for direct consumption, special tools shall be used to separate and deliver the food. Special tools should be positioned and placed, and the payment should be separated to prevent pollution.

Article 30: Seasonings for customers to take for themselves shall comply with the corresponding food hygiene standards and requirements.

Article 31: The packaging and transportation of takeaway food shall comply with the relevant hygiene requirements, and indicate the time of production and the expiration date. It is forbidden to sell and distribute food that has exceeded its expiration date or that has spoiled.

There are many things that the school does that we can't understand, we can only live like this, eldest sister, this is how I came over, if you think it violates your right to choose your own consumption, but he just can't let takeaway in, you can't help it.

Summary. Even if there is a cafeteria, it is not mandatory for students to eat in the cafeteria.

There is no cafeteria to order fast food to eat in the classroom, and students are forced to eat at school.

This is not appropriate for schools.

How to report this situation.

Even if there is a cafeteria, it is not mandatory for students to eat in the cafeteria.

Management issues. It's a one-size-fits-all approach.

So parents can communicate with the school leaders and put forward your opinions. Make them realize that this kind of management is not a good management method.

Come up with your own workaround.

Our two children are a one-year code only knowledge level and a two-mountain sports grade, the school is two minutes away from our home, and we want to let the children go back to school at noon to eat at home, but the school disagrees, saying that it is stipulated above and does not open the door.

It would be better to come up with your own solution that would be acceptable to both parties.

The meals are all made of plastic fast food boxes, and parents are not clear about hygiene.

Well, such a situation can only be negotiated.

All children's homes are close by, right?

Basically all parents have opinions, right? Not alone you have an opinion.

The village public school is within two kilometers of home.

If most people have an opinion, first consult with the school, put forward their opinion, and put forward their own requirements.

You don't need the fast food ordered by the school, you can eat it yourself at home.

What department should respond to this problem?

Parents are united, and the school will definitely listen to you.

The school said that it was stipulated by the higher authorities.

If the school ignores it, then go to the education department to report it, the higher education bureau.

Nonsense, where did that rule?

How can a primary school in a village have such a rule?

Are they trying to make money, do they charge a reasonable fee?

Your parents will jointly negotiate first, and if it doesn't work, go to the higher authorities to complain.

Or refuse to pay, the children refuse to lunch.

I hope the above suggestions can help you <>