Is man the measure of the world by which man 20

Man is not strictly a measure of the world.

But people do not simply live in the world, but also live more closely in human society, so people, strictly speaking, should be the measure of human society in this world.

Man is the measure of all things. This is an epistemological point of view. Human-centric.

The measure of the world should be completely attributed to "wisdom", the world (the universe) gave birth to life, but the only human being has wisdom, and wisdom seems to be the theme of this world, this universe, life has wisdom, and to understand this world, this universe.

The three seem to be spinning, and the universe-life-intelligence-universe-life-wisdom is getting bigger and bigger.

Only wisdom can understand the universe (the world), can an ant, a fish, and an elephant understand the world? So wisdom should be the measure of the world.

No. In ancient Greece and Rome, Protagoras of the Sophist School proposed that "man is the measure of all things", but this statement was called "sophistry" by later generations.

The most important philosophical quote handed down by Protagorarius is in On Truth: "Man is the measure of all things, all things exist when they exist, and all things do not exist when they do not exist." When he says people, he means people's feelings.

What a thing is, should be based on the human feeling. A thing is what it is presented to your senses to you, and to me it is what it is presented to my senses. When a gust of wind blows, and you feel cold, it is cold; I feel hot, it's hot.

The wind itself doesn't matter whether it's hot or cold. In the same way, whether a person's behavior is good or bad is also based on the person's feelings. If you think it's good, it's good; I think it's bad, it's bad.

It doesn't matter if the behavior itself is good or bad.

This philosophical quote of Protagoras had an iconoclastic meaning at the time. In Greece at that time, the traditional concept was that God was the measure of all things; Whether things exist or not, whether they are good or bad, is determined by God. Protagoras's substitution of man for God after doubting the existence of God is undoubtedly of great significance in the history of Greek philosophy.

However, it seems to us today that this statement is incorrect, because the existence and nature of objective things do not depend on whether people feel them or how they change or not. He regards the nature of things, such as hot and cold, as the product of subjective feelings, and denies the objectivity of the nature of things, which makes it easy to fall into subjective idealism.

Chung's Chicken Soup: People are the measure of all things.

Man only uses his own yardstick to measure all things, but man is not the center of all things, if one day there is something that can destroy mankind, then man can only admit it.

This is a problem that the elective teacher has to solve.

Man observes and understands the world from a human perspective, describing the world.

First of all, from the background of the introduction of this sentence, in the ancient Greek era, Protagoras, the school of sages, proposed. This sentence had an important meaning at the time. 1. Pay full attention to the value of human beings and enhance the importance of human beings as the main body of understanding the world; 2. It broke the situation in which God dominated the world at that time; 3. It exalts the rational value of human beings.

At the time, these were seen as positive, positive, and valuable. And over time, this sentence has become the abuse of many theories, such as "anthropocentrism".

Secondly, this sentence has also produced a lot of misunderstandings over time. Judging from the sentence itself, it is imperfect, or it has a strong subjective emotion in it. In the Age of Enlightenment, the status of human and intellectual freedom was re-exalted, and this phrase was also developed.

But the subjective role of man is exaggerated, and the existing facts are not taken into account, and so on. caused serious consequences, etc., etc.

Finally, we should get this sentence right. This sentence reveals that the ancient Greek spirit of advocating humanity is worthy of our learning, but we should also continue to enrich the connotation of this sentence according to the development and changes of the times and society, in the face of the powerful nature, we should lower our stature and live in harmony with the natural world.

Humanity is the source of the destruction of all things.

First of all, we must evaluate from a person's literacy, to see whether her conversation and knowledge are wide, this is very important, but also very indispensable, a person's literacy is the primary evaluation standard, if a person does not even have literacy, then this person must not necessarily be how good others will be, others will agree more with him, this is the most indispensable part of evaluating others. Secondly, it depends on whether a person has knowledge, this is the most advantageous advantage, a person has knowledge, not only gives a very good impression alone, but also improves others' perception of him, because knowledge can determine your ability, this aspect is to consider your future working conditions, whether the living conditions in the later period can be improved, the richer your knowledge, the richer your life, so this is also an essential part, how others think of it will also determine whether he can compare your knowledge with him, whether the knowledge is wider than theirsSo we must study hard during school, strive to improve our academic performance, let ourselves learn more things, improve our learning ability, try to take more certificates, this is very helpful for the future, for their own future, we must work hard, we must become what we think we are, work hard, work together, this is the only way to change our fate, work together. Finally, the core of a person's evaluation is honesty, being a man must be honest and trustworthy, don't be untrustworthy because of their own problems, the things established in front of them will be consumed by themselves, and they will become completely losers, so we must be honest and trustworthy on the road to success, and don't lose their trust because of some things, this is the most basic condition for being a man, and it is also an indispensable condition, we will always encounter all kinds of things on the road of life, and we can't affect ourselves because of some things. It leads to the loss of trust in others, which is very unreliable, and it will also make you become a failure on the road to success, we must carefully choose what we should do, and do not embark on an irreparable place.

Eastern and Western cultures through the eyes of Chinese scholars.

China's accession to the WTO has brought unprecedented challenges, not only from the economic and technological fields, but more importantly, with the acceleration of China's opening up to the outside world, our culture is also undergoing profound changes. The experience of China's development in the 20th century has taught us that the clinging to tradition and the total westernization will have disastrous consequences for the development of Chinese society. In an article entitled "On the Complementary Relationship between Eastern and Western Cultures", Mr. Ji Xianlin used "30 years in Hedong, 30 years in Hexi" to describe the historical changes in Eastern and Western cultures.

He believes that in the 21st century, the Western culture, which is dominated by metaphysical analysis, has come to an end, and it will inevitably be replaced by the Eastern culture, which is known for its comprehensive strengths. To this end, he proposed that when dealing with the relationship between Western culture and Chinese culture, on the one hand, we should pay attention to absorbing all the good things in Western culture, both material and spiritual, and change our values and ways of thinking by "taking them"; On the other hand, we should inherit and carry forward the rational elements of Chinese culture, so that the oriental civilization can make its due contribution to the development of mankind.

Tang Yijie further elaborated on the roots of the rise and fall of Chinese culture from the perspective of the role of people in cultural inheritance. He pointed out that the trend of "total westernization" that emerged in the 20 th century caused China to lose its self-confidence in its own culture to a certain extent, and Chinese it had a strong consciousness and initiative in absorbing foreign culture, but it lacked such consciousness and initiative in spreading its own culture to the outside world.

This state of affairs is related to the national character of the Chinese. Historically, the Chinese have been able to treat foreign cultures with a tolerant attitude, but the Chinese lack the enterprising spirit of the outward. This state of affairs is related to the "great power mentality" of China's strength.

We think that it is natural for other people to come to us to learn from us, and we don't need to go to them to spread Chinese culture. In the past two centuries, with the rise of our Western countries, our arrogance has begun to degenerate into inferiority complex, and we feel that we are backward everywhere. In fact, this arrogance and inferiority are indicative of the lack of aggressiveness in Chinese culture.

What can be done to change this? Mr. Tang said.

Whether this person is real or not, he can associate with real people, not with intelligent people.

Protagoras "Man is the measure of all things".

Meaning: The existence or non-existence of all things, the form and nature of things all depend on human feelings.

Evaluation: Affirm and emphasize the value of human beings, and place them at the center of the world and society. It is the first awakening of human self-consciousness under the rule of primitive religion and nature, and it is the abuse of the Western humanistic spirit.

The emphasis on the status and role of the human person is the first embodiment of the spirit of humanism, which also brings to mind the role of ideological enlightenment and emancipation.

Negative) overemphasizes people's subjective feelings and denies the objective criteria of the world.