Why isn t education a panacea? Do you think education is everything?

If we look at Marx's analysis, education belongs to only one kind of superstructure. The superstructure can affect the economic base, but it cannot determine the economic base. And the economic base can determine the superstructure. So the role of education is limited.

The biggest shortcoming of education is the lag of its role. Laws and regulations are enacted, which can be implemented immediately and produce immediate results, while the use of educational means has a slow and after-effect effect.

The role of education is limited, but it is far-reaching. We should pay attention to the role of education, but we should not insist on it"Educational omnipotence"attitude. It is better to combine education with other means to solve problems than to hope for the results of education alone.

The biggest problem with education is to bring a large group of people together to learn the same thing, so that the individual differences are getting smaller and smaller, which is not conducive to the development of people's personality. Education in China is even more so.

It's not a small problem.

Education in our country is a bit rigid.

Not paying attention to developing the child's creativity.

Personal insights

It needs to be recognized that education cannot solve all problems and needs practical experience.

I think that our current education is ostensibly to educate all-round talents, but in fact, we want to educate all-round talents.

Education is as follows:Strictly speaking, education is not a panacea. There is no omnipotence in anything in the world, although education is to educate people to improve their ability and level, but it also has its limitations, and is also limited by conditions such as time, place, person and education direction, etc., the products that come out are not omnipotent, so it is not comprehensive and scientific to think that education is omnipotent.

Introduction:

In accordance with laws, regulations and industry norms, according to school conditions and professional titles, educators carry out education and cultivation of the mental development of the educated in a purposeful, planned and organized manner, teach people with existing experience and knowledge, and explain various phenomena, problems or behaviors for them, so as to improve their practical ability.

In it, people slowly move from sensory touch to cognitive understanding of a thing, and form a relatively perfect or rational self-conscious thinking. But at the same time, people have self-conscious thinking and their own sensory dimension, so any educational conscious thinking may not be absolutely correct, but should perceptually understand the direction of their thinking, as long as they do not deviate from the inner nature of things.

Education is not a panacea, especially in China, but learning is a panacea at all times!

1. Nothing is a panacea, and the same is true of the education system.

2. Although the imperial examination system inherited from ancient China has evolved into today's college entrance examination system, many families and students hope that their children can study hard, be admitted to a good university, and have a good salary and job.

3. But there have been many opposite things this year, such as the collective absence of SUSTech from the 2011 college entrance examination, and the incident of the doctor jumping off the building of the University of Science and Technology of China, which shows that today's education system is not omnipotent, and we need to have a better attitude to face the college entrance examination.

4. Of course, there is no mistake in reading, and it is still necessary to read good books, but don't be the only way to get ahead. What we should strive to cultivate is an all-round talent, a talent who can take responsibility and can withstand pressure.

If it was omnipotent, there would be no Yaojiaxin.

Education is not a panacea, learning is everything!

All roads lead to Rome.

The theory of educational omnipotence was the 18th century French Enlightenment thinkerMaterialismThe theory proposed by the philosopher Elvé. The sedan chair makes you pay great attention to the role of education, and even exaggerates it and advocates that education is omnipotent. He believes that people are the product of education, and people's spirit, character and temperament are the results of education, "what kind of education people receive, what kind of people become", "education is a slippery and omnipotent, it can even create geniuses".

Erwei believes in the omnipotence of education, adheres to the idea of changing society through education, and fantasizes about sweeping away feudal superstitions through education.

and prejudice, develop human reason, and form a "sound morality", which can change the social status quo and establish a "reasonable" social system.

The advantages and disadvantages of the theory of educational omnipotence

Although the "omnipotence theory of education" advocated by Elvis exaggerated the social role of education and had obvious one-sidedness and absolutist defects, under the historical conditions at that time, this theory of fantasizing about transforming society through education reflected the overthrow of the feudal system by the emerging bourgeoisie.

The requirements for progress.

However, on the one hand, Elvis believes that human beings are the product of environment and education, and on the other hand, it believes that the transformation of human beings must first transform the environment and education, thus falling into an inextricable circular contradiction. In the end, he had to turn to genius for help, believing that it was necessary to save the world, educate the masses, and change human nature through the prescience of the prophets. In this way, he took the masses of the people.

Seen as a passive gangster.

However, a small number of geniuses are regarded as educators who are born to know, and thus fall into the historical view of "opinions dominate the world".

According to Marx's analysis, education belongs to only one kind of superstructure. The superstructure can affect the economic base, but it cannot determine the economic base. The economic base can determine the superstructure, so the role of education is limited.

The biggest deficiency of education is the lag of its role, the formulation of laws and regulations, can be implemented immediately, and the use of educational means, its effect is slow, after-effect.

The role of education is limited, but it is also far-reaching. We should pay attention to the role of education, but we should not insist on it"Educational omnipotence"It is better to combine education with other means to solve problems than to hope for educational results alone.

Educational omnipotence refers to the rationalists of the century who exaggerated the role of education to the point that it can determine society and deny the influence of genetic differences on human development.

Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, believed that the reason why people become human beings is entirely dependent on education. The German philosopher Leibniz once said that if he was given full authority to educate, it would not take 100 years to change the outlook of Europe.

The French materialist Elvis is a representative of the omnipotence of education. In "On Man's Rational Ability and Education", he opposed the concept of talent, believing that people's talents are equal, there is no difference in genetic quality, people are the products of environment and education, and people's character, qi, Zen, auspiciousness, and spirit are all the results of education. <

He denied the individual differences between people, asserting that the formation of people is only the result of education, and that the differences in intelligence between people are only caused by education, that is, "what kind of education people receive makes them what kind of people they become."

Education can never be a panacea. It is probably only a luxury to change a person's quality and behavior habits based on a few empty words. However, the laws introduced by the state today restrict education everywhere. Teachers are constrained at every turn.

There are no students who can't teach well, only teachers who can't teach well." I don't know where this phrase came from, nor how scientific it is.

【The Theory of Educational Omnipotence】The argument put forward by the 18th century French Enlightenment thinker and materialist philosopher Elvé. The decisive factor for the growth of Erwei is education, which denies the innate concept and believes that all human mental activities and human cognition are based on the sensory perception of external things.

He denied the individual differences between people, asserting that the formation of people is only the result of education, and that the differences in intelligence between people are only caused by education, that is, "what kind of education a person receives, what kind of person he becomes". On the one hand, he believes that people are the product of the environment and education, and that the environment must be transformed to transform people. On the other hand, he believes that people's prejudices rule the world, and the transformation of the environment must also change people's prejudices, that is, to transform society through education, so he advocates that education is omnipotent. This educational theory of Elvis reflected the progressive demand of the emerging bourgeoisie to overthrow the feudal system, but fell into the idealistic view of history of "the will dominates the world" under the historical conditions of the time.

Elvis (the Enlightenment) proposed that people become the kind of people they become after they are educated.

But when it comes to the omnipotence of education, we often talk about Watson, who said, "Give me a bunch of healthy babies, and in a few years I will be able to train them to be lawyers, doctors, judges, and even thieves as needed (presumably so, I forgot).

The theory of educational omnipotence is a one-sided exaggeration of the role of education in human development, arguing that human beings are entirely the product of education. Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher, believed that the reason why people become human beings is entirely the result of education. Watson, an American psychologist, once said that he could change a dozen able-bodied children at will by special methods, and train them to become doctors, lawyers, beggars, thieves, etc.

The French Enlightenment thinker Alvis is a representative of the theory of educational omnipotence, and in his "On Man's Rational Ability and Education", he believes that people's talents are equal, there is no difference in genetic quality, people are the product of environment and education, and people's character, temperament and spirit are the results of education. Through the development of human rationality through education, sound morality can be formed, thereby changing the social status quo and establishing a rational social system. It can be seen that those who hold the omnipotence of education generally ignore or deny the role of genetic quality and human subjective initiative in human development, and regard the social environment and education as the decisive factors affecting human development.