What to do if the two sides have different definitions in a debate match

Many debate competitions are like this, because the positions of the two sides are different, they often choose to be on the standard that is beneficial to their own side, and they cannot reach an agreement, resulting in it as if they are talking to themselves, and there is no point of contention. In fact, one of the principles that both sides grasp when determining the standard is to be fair, so that both themselves and the other party have room for argumentation.

The different needs that people show through their social relationships. Interests are essentially in the category of social relations. Since human needs are multifaceted, there are many and varied interests.

The possession of material products based on status in the system of production relations is a material interest, also known as an economic interest.

In our learning and life, language is indispensable, and debate is an activity that turns language into a sharp weapon, so in the process of debating the competition, question whether the other party's definition is advisable, let's talk about this issue.

At the beginning of the debate competition, when the opponent begins to explain the opponent's point of view, we should define the key words in the opponent's debate question, and when we notice that the opponent does not clearly define it, we can see this as a breakthrough, and find a point on this breakthrough that can defeat the opponent.

At this time, when the other party does not have a clear definition, the initiative falls in your hands Xianchang, you can redefine it, grasp the initiative, the definition is a foundation of the game, whether the house is firmly built depends on whether the foundation is good or not, if the opponent's debater has obvious errors in the definition, it also means that his definition is untenable in common sense and logic, at this time, it is desirable to question the other party's definition.

Of course, if the opponent's definition is clear and there is no mistake, if you hold on to the opponent's definition, it will not only lead to deviations in your own subsequent debate competition, but also put the initiative in the hands of the opponent's debater, which is not advisable at this time.

On the other hand, you should also do a good job of defining each keyword, and logically make it impossible for others to find faults. Reasonably avoid the points that are unfavorable to your side, and sometimes it is not necessary to face the other party's questions and avoid jumping into the other party's trap.

Therefore, before the debate competition, you should carefully scrutinize your keyword definition, and when you make sure that your definition is not logical and common sense errors, when debating with the other party, observe whether the other party's definition is clear, whether there are common sense and logical errors, if there is, then you can question the other party's definition, if there is no logical error, it is not advisable to question the other party's definition, and then you must defeat the opponent in other aspects.