Why did Britain not have the same history of Qin s unification of the six kingdoms as China did in a

British history? Early Britain was very backward, staying in the clan commune period for a long time, and Britain was often invaded by foreign tribes, of course, the current Britain belongs to the invasion of the Germanic bloodline, there must have been unification, but it was very late, around 800 AD, when we were in the Tang Dynasty, they were about a thousand years behind us, alas, now it is not good.

1. If you want to say that the British Isles of the same era as Qin, then I can say that it was because it was still a barbarian at that time.

The era is no different from the primitive society. The Roman Empire, which brought civilization, has not yet hit here.

2. If you are talking about a slightly late era, in fact the Germanic people were already close to solving this problem.

The Anglo-Saxons (present-day English, a branch of the Germanic people) had driven the original Celts out.

Scotland and Wales are these mountainous and highlands.

Before that, the Celts had slaughtered the original Iberians ......

3. In short, taking Britain alone, it is too small to form the unique history and culture of continental countries.

Continental countries are also unable to form the history and culture of island nations.

Because Britain is on the verge of the European continent, the advanced civilized nations of the continent have landed in England in waves and established a country, so the national unity and annexation of Britain is generally unified from south to north, and they are all foreign races, and they are integrated into England in the process of advancing northward, so the ancient history of Britain is the history of foreign invasion, resistance to invasion, and mutual integration.

I think it is also a cultural characteristic, and the ideas accepted by Qi are all the same. There is also a lot of communication. People also want to unify in the end, but in England, the difference is a little bigger, and there is not much integration.

Occupy it in time, and people will have a kind of idea of being a slave in the country, so there will be a lot of resistance in China. It was agreed before, so this kind of thinking is very small

Because it was the Qin Dynasty that unified the six countries, the Qin Dynasty did not know that there was a country called England at that time.

First of all, you have to say which six countries Britain wants to unify? And what you want to say about unification is specifically referring to which period of the British Union, the British Stuart dynasty and the island of Great Britain were unified, your statement is too general.

There was no Shang Dynasty in Britain.

Then you need to be reincarnated to know.

Britain has been a country since its beginnings. The ancestors of the modern British are several branches of the Germanic peoples, in the great migration of European peoples that began in the 4th century AD, the Anglos, Saxons, Fries, and other Germanic peoples moved to the British Isles, and successfully established more than a dozen countries in the areas controlled by the former Britons and Romans, while the Britons retreated to the western mountains, and the areas not controlled by Rome in the north were still the land of the Scottish, while Ireland, although similar to the Britons, was relatively independent. There are more than a dozen countries in the British land, and such a process of unification takes a long time, especially since there is no civilization and is often disturbed by foreign peoples.

The Vikings, Normans, and others successively established new states on the island of Britain. William, the conqueror at the beginning of England, was a Norman, and since then, the Anglos and Saxons have gradually merged into the English, establishing states in different places with the Scots, Welsh, and Irish. There is nothing to blend in with them, and they are still distinct to this day.

Moreover, in the fourth century, they were very divided, and finally their unification was completed through the European Union in the Second World War, and it was resolved by violence in the Middle Ages, so there was no reunification.

The Middle Ages has entered the feudal society of the whole world, that is, the era of the kingdom, at this time Britain has actually formed a unified country, of course, the territory is not the territory of the United Kingdom now, nor is it called Britain, and the dynasties experienced by the British Middle Ages are:

Norman, Anjou (Plantagenet), Tudor, Stuart, Hanover, Saxony Coburg Gotha.

Of course, there were also kingdoms between the Roman Empire and the Norman Dynasty, which generally do not fall back to the Middle Ages, so to speak, a transitional stage from slavery to feudalism.

Due to many religious and ethnic reasons, it is also related to the feudal lordship in Europe, and the same is true in Europe at that time.

Because at that time, the British were not called British, they were just a few different races or tribes living together, with different languages, so they could not communicate, and they could not form a unified country.

This is related to ethnic, geographical patterns.

It's a very simple question, and if you take a good history lesson, you'll find that it's even a world war2 They are already very developed, but the number of people they participated in the war is the same as in ancient China, not to mention when they are not developed, how much will their population be, you think about it, even if you are trying to unify Europe, but the troops stationed in each place are more than a few dozen people, after all, the place is not small, and there are few people, so it is impossible to say that it is unification During World War I and World War II, Germany was not without ** equipment, but there was no one Just like the unconditional surrender of the War of Resistance Against Japan, only women and the old, weak, sick and disabled were left, which can illustrate the importance of population In fact, what the upstairs said is also right, but what you said is that in ancient times, it was the population, after all, there was no large-scale lethality at that time, and the army of each country was 1 or 20,000 people, how to unify such a large place.

The difference between mainland culture and maritime culture.