What are the chains of contempt that exist in today s literary world?

I think that the chain of contempt that exists in the literary world at any time period is mainly borrowing other people's articles, and only a slight change becomes your own, and this kind of existence is very contemptuous for plagiarism or borrowing.

The first is that serious literature will discriminate against martial arts romance**, and this kind of ** will discriminate against prose articles, and prose will discriminate against chicken soup essays. And the chicken soup article is actually those networks**, and in the end, the network **will discriminate against the story and detective**.

Serious literature looks down on popular literature, traditional literature looks down on online literature, those who write suspense reasoning look down on those who write time-traveling, those who write through palace fights and house fights look down on those who write Mary Sue silly and sweet, and those who write Tanmei look down on those who write romance, in fact, the writing is good and logical, and the writing is illogical. The more rigorous and connotative the book, the more unclear it is to see those more vernacular**, and the bottom of the chain of contempt in the literary world is always those online articles that can be written by individuals on the Internet.

The chain of literary contempt exists because the quality of some works is worrying, and online literature is still malleable. With the continuous development of the Internet, e-books and online literature were born. The weight of a paper book has become a small size for a mobile device, which is a good thing.

However, online literature has always been criticized, and many writers and readers have automatically drawn a dividing line between online literature and other types of literature, believing that they are incompatible.

First of all, let's talk about the reason for the existence of the chain of literary contempt. This is because the threshold for publishing works on the Internet is lower than that of printed books, and there are few facilities to correct and consider, so many writers or writers can publish articles before their writing level reaches the level where they can spread the culture of the new era, resulting in uneven quality of online literature, and many works even have typos and incoherent sentences throughout, causing readers to frown frequently when reading them, lamenting that the Internet is still inferior to paper. This is where the chain of contempt arises.

However, not all online literature is difficult to see, and there are still outstanding ones that have become the guiding signs that lead online literature to flourish. Many talented writers can be appreciated by people even if they publish their works on the Internet with a sea of articles, and many well-written ** have gradually gone out of the Internet and printed physical books. For example, "Breaking the Sky" by Silkworm Tudou, "Notes on Tomb Robbery" by the Third Uncle of the Southern School, and "Douluo Continent" by the Tang Family Sanshao are all works with a very vast world structure and a compact and proper plot.

There are also presit's "There are bandits", "silent reading" and so on.

In fact, this chain of literary contempt has been slowly fading, and online literature is gradually being accepted by more and more readers. This is an irresistible trend and trend in the new era, and online literature is gradually developing in a good direction.

Some online literature is indeed not very good, so many people have some contempt or contempt, but it does not mean that all online literature is bad, but the proportion is larger.

Because online literature is generally regarded as fast food literature, it has little value. A lot of online literature is quite good.

This is because most of the online literature is relatively vulgar, so over time, people will feel that online literature is vulgar, so it is difficult to be elegant.

It's not that I despise online literature, but I despise the dirt and dirt of online literature, and now many disgusting games should be used as online literature and become popular. For example, the so-called decisive dark text is typical.

It's not despised, literature should not be despised in all its forms, unless it is particularly vulgar, or that kind of particularly brainless, they are not in line with the actual **, this kind of thing will bring harm to others, of course it will be despised, as long as you are positive, healthy, and upward, you will not be despised.

Internet literature belongs to fast food literature! Isn't it the era of fast food? What, McDonald's KFC, is very popular. Learning is also, quick success, fast food is not nutritious.

The etymology is the special feature of the Shenzhen magazine "City Weekly" on April 7, 2012.

At a time when contempt has become blatant, fearless, and unscrupulous, it seems that there is no contempt for not being able to prove one's excellence, high-end and success. You despise me, I despise him, despise the hierarchy that the food chain will eliminate again, and the middle finger and the roll of the eyes are the "palace wall" separating narcissism and inferiority.

Contempt is like a food chain, a strange circle that cannot be avoided. When Ji Kang, a wild expert who "does not wash his face on January 15th", used the way of academic debate with "literati are light, first light and then heavy", he never thought that this word would become a pretext for the literati to compete for jealousy, "trample" and dump each other in the future, let alone that this game would spread to all levels of life and become a "food chain" of "lightness".

Contempt is not the game of the rulers, but the "venting of desires" of passers-by. Contempt, the word itself has a strong gesture of inequality. I'm good, you're bad!

I'm good, you're bad! I'm high-class, you're vulgar! I'm the core, you're on the edge!

I and you are always at opposite ends of the scale, and mine is different from you to show personality.