Senior 3 Philosophy Exercises, High School Philosophy Topics

First, the particularity of contradictions, the specific analysis of specific problems, the development of industry to the stage of feeding back agriculture. The second is that the material determines the consciousness of everything from reality, and embodies the principle according to the national conditions; the three consciousness reacts, and the issuance of the first document should give full play to the role of the document in promoting the construction; fourth, the quantitative change causes the qualitative change, the same floor. Fifth, the perspective of development.

Sixth, contact, grasp the connection between agriculture and industry.

1. Quantitative change produces qualitative change.

2. There are different contradictions in different periods, and it is necessary to grasp the main contradictions, and the primary and secondary contradictions will change in a certain period.

3. We should look at the changes in the world from a comprehensive, systematic and dynamic perspective.

Cross = phenomenon, devil = essence, hidden in = unity relationship: so choose d

Prevention of micro = accumulation of small into large = quantitative change and qualitative change = development of the problem = dialectical thinking.

Insignificance = only looking at the time, looking at the problem without development = static and one-sided, looking at what is said without considering agency = metaphysical thinking.

Choosing BA is wrong, and the connection is universal and objective. It can't be accidental. Exclude.

C, D should be seen in this way, the relationship between consumers and enterprises is the relationship of opposition and unity, and the two are mutually opposed and unified to promote the development of things. Moreover, I myself feel that the unity of opposites is generally impossible to separate, there are contradictions in everything, there are contradictions from time to time, and contradictions are the unity of opposites.

b is correct. The connection is concrete, conditional, objective, and it is written in the book.

In fact, this question has little to do with the material, as long as you have a good grasp of the relevant knowledge of the philosophical connections in the book, it is completely optional. Don't be influenced by the material.

1. It doesn't exist occasionally, so a is not right; 2. It is not conditionally existent, so B is not right; 3. It's not just quantitative change, so C is not right.

1. Look at the topic, which means that the strict requirements of consumers will not only not make the enterprise go bankrupt, but will promote the progress of the enterprise.

2. It can be seen that a pair of contradictions are mentioned in the question stem, that is, consumers and enterprises, we know: contradictions are the unity of opposites. But in this stem, only opposition is mentioned, not unity.

3. In the question stem, it is said that "it will force domestic enterprises to strive to improve product quality and continue to innovate, so as to win the advantage of international competition".

It means that under the continuous demand of consumers, enterprises will go through the continuous accumulation of quantity, and finally take a qualitative leap and win the advantage.

I think the answer is d (forgive me if there is any discrepancy with the standard answer).

1.Wang Fuzhi is materialistic. All believe that there is a thing first, and then there is a God. To put it bluntly, in reality, you must first exist, and then in the heart. Moreover, the other three options are idealistic. You can do it with elimination.

2. Facts have proven that the principle of one country, two systems is completely correct. - has been implemented, so) practice is the only criterion for testing the truth of knowledge.

I definitely have to choose, and I will see this kind of topic in the future. I'm in my third year of high school, and I haven't been involved in politics for a long time. I told you this from memory. Hope it helps. o(∩_o

1.Analysis: Wang Fuzhi is first of all a subjective idealist, which must have been studied in the history of the first year of high school, right?

Subjective idealists believe that consciousness is the primordial and matter is a derivative. And "the existence of the form is the existence of the gods, and the extinction of the form is the destruction of the gods" reflects that matter is consciously dominated, so it is the same as Wang Fuzhi's view, so C

2.Analysis: You omitted some of this question, in fact, I think the omitted materials are also very important, this paragraph reflects that the answer to the two is the only criterion for testing the truth of understanding, and the "one country, two systems" is put forward from practice (about the facts of China and Australia), so choose

The watchtower lord adopts...

The reason why C was chosen for the first question is because Wang Fuzhi's view is materialistic, and the same is true for C.

The reason why 2 is not chosen for the second question is that although 2 is also correct, the role of theory on practice is not mentioned in this question, but only the role of practice on theory.

c option is correct.

The so-called knowledge generally refers to specific sciences, such as natural sciences. Philosophy, on the other hand, is the generalization and summary of specific sciences and the exploration of the laws of the development of things. Concrete science is the foundation of the development of philosophy, and philosophy has a guiding role in the development of concrete science, and the two are interdependent.

Only by constantly enriching and developing concrete science, that is, concrete knowledge, and analyzing, summarizing, and generalizing specific knowledge, can concrete knowledge be transformed into philosophical wisdom.

c, this topic should be a test of the relationship between philosophy and science, philosophy is a re-understanding of scientific understanding, a kind of reflection.

1. The strongest evidence to refute agnosticism is practice.

This is a classic thesis of Marxism.

I choose this form of reflection to be the appearance. It is holistic and is no longer a reflection of sensation or perception, i.e., a singular nature.

1.The strongest argument against agnosticism is (b).

a Matter can be perceived through the senses.

b Man can reveal the essence through phenomena.

c Perceptual cognition can be elevated to rational cognition.

d.Practice.

2.Recalling in the mind the shape, color, smell, and taste of apples falls under (c).

a.Concept BAppearance cPerception DFeel.

This is just a typical dialectical materialist viewpoint, but in fact, the above problems are not philosophical at all, but phenomena. In fact, it might as well be called political science.

This is of course to notice that the accumulation of quantitative changes to a certain extent will cause qualitative changes, just like the folk proverb that stealing needles from small hours will develop to stealing guns when large, because quantitative changes cause qualitative changes, small mistakes seem to be not serious in nature, but such things are done more and bigger, and their nature becomes serious, which is the so-called quantitative change causing qualitative change.

As for the fact that external causes work through internal causes, this sentence itself is true, but it is not suitable for the perspective of seeing the subtleties and preventing the subtleties.

It can be seen from seeing the subtleties and knowing the subtleties and preventing the subtleties from gradually.

External causes work through internal causes, which is not right in itself.

are working together.