Chess or backgammon, which do you prefer to play?

Playing chess is now a way for us to relax in life, and it is also a sport, how much do you know about chess? In terms of object chess or backgammon, which one do you prefer to play? Today, let's talk about my preference for chess. <>

Backgammon and chess, everyone is more familiar with these two kinds of chess, there are more people who can play these two kinds of chess, backgammon is mainly leisure and entertainment, and chess is to use the brain and strategy, in view, chess should be more interesting than backgammon, backgammon pays more attention to focus and patience, and chess is different, he relies on strategy, chess you can win in a move, it is equivalent to arranging troops, playing to win a game of chess, your heart is extremely excited and joyful, in your heart is secretly thinking about how smart you are. Of course, backgammon is not bad, but backgammon mainly focuses on using time to grind, so for children, backgammon is more acceptable, but for young people and middle-aged and elderly people, they prefer to play chess, because his brain ability is stronger than backgammon, and for chess and backgammon, the number of people who prefer Xiangqi is more. <>

In life, have you ever noticed such a phenomenon when playing chess? A group of old people gathered around, and instead of chatting, they were playing chess, but the number of times they played backgammon was rare. Backgammon, everyone may know, he is a chess and card game played by two people alone, it pays attention to a word, that is, quiet, and chess is different, he can be a lot of people watching, you can also discuss your own ideas with everyone, reflect your strategic talent.

So for Xiangqi and backgammon, I'm more biased towards Xiangqi. The fun it can bring to people is different.

Okay, let's take you to understand here today, I believe everyone has different ideas, if you have anything you want to share with us, you can leave a message below the comment area to discuss.

I prefer to play backgammon. Because the rules are relatively simple, the rules of Xiangqi are too complicated, as a person who has just started, Xiangqi is too brain-consuming, and Gomoku is easier to play, mainly because I am more powerful in Gomoku.

In contrast, I like to play chess, because I am not very good at backgammon, chess has been influenced by my father since I was a child, and I have been talking about horses and walking in the sun, and I have never returned to the field, and I often played a game with my father when I was a child.

Chess and backgammon, in fact, I prefer backgammon because I think chess requires a lot of brains, and it is very difficult for me.

I prefer to play backgammon and backgammon because I think backgammon is a bit easier to play than chess.

I like chess because I grew up watching my grandfather play chess, which makes me miss my childhood.

Backgammon is actually the five elements: the left green dragon, the right white tiger, the Xuanwu Vermilion Bird, and the inner earth has no words.

Chess cultivates your overall concept and assesses the situation.

Backgammon develops your mathematical and logical deduction skills.

It's all good, it's very beneficial.

There is no good or bad, it's all entertainment. However, in terms of puzzles alone, chess is a little better, and it is a good exercise for people's thinking ability.

Backgammon and Xiangqi are both exercises for thinking skills, and I personally prefer backgammon.

Chess needs to die a lot of brain cells, and backgammon needs good eyesight.

In the big picture; Chess, of course.

In terms of skill and consideration of the big picture, chess is superior. But if you don't usually play a lot of chess, learning chess as soon as you start up can be boring and draining your patience. So I recommend that you can go to V X to play a small game of backgammon, like this [Meng Meng Gomoku] is quite good, usually fragmented time can be opened at any time to match a game, practice chess skills.

Summary. This is not necessarily, as long as he studies hard, he will always have a better side, there is a famous saying that God closes a door for you, he must open a window for you, so a stupid person, as long as he studies hard, Xiangqi backgammon will also play well. <>

<> can a person who is good at chess and backgammon mean that the person is smart? Or not necessarily.

It can only show that this person's logical thinking ability is not unusually strong, this smart, this word, it includes a lot of things, logical thinking ability is only one aspect, he also has fierce language, emotional intelligence and other aspects of the bridge. <>

Therefore, <> people who do not blindly play chess must be smart, this is only one aspect, if this person is more intelligent, he is more prominent <>in dealing with people, logical thinking ability, grinding language ability, adaptability, emotional intelligence, etc

<>So what if a person is stupid? Is backgammon never a good game?

There is a famous saying that God closes a door for you, and will definitely open a window for you to know the noise, so a relatively stupid person, as long as he studies hard, Xiangqi backgammon will also play very well. <>

Summary. The same can't be said for this. Chess can be said to have something to do with talent, but it doesn't mean that you will never be able to play well. Sometimes it's really hard work to make up for clumsiness, stupid birds fly first, if you only consider talent and talent, you can't do anything, and the times won't develop.

<> can a person who is good at chess and backgammon mean that the person is smart? Or not necessarily.

This doesn't necessarily mean that.

Because according to the current development of science and technology, the development of computers. At present, it has been proved that backgammon, chess human beings are no longer the opponent of computer AI, so do you say that people are smart or computers are smart, no one, where is the computer that takes Huilai, there is no wisdom of Zen people, where is artificial intelligence. That doesn't explain the problem.

<>So what if a person is stupid? Is backgammon never a good game?

The same can't be said for this. Chess can be said to have something to do with talent, but pretending to be a trick doesn't mean that you will never be able to play well. Sometimes it's really hard work to make up for clumsiness, and the stupid bird hall is flying first, if you only consider talent and talent, you can't do anything, and the times won't develop.

For example, because no matter how fast the computing speed of the human sedan brain is, it can't be faster than the computer, so in the future, can all human beings rely on the computer itself to take a back seat? People always have to rely on themselves, and the people who know the sedan chair are their own, and their efforts are also their own, but once they give up their efforts because of their talents, it is a complete failure.