The United States launched another beheading operation, and the target died on the spot, why did the

Updated on military 2024-06-12
45 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Because this is a tactic that can easily cause panic, no one wants such a country to be able to use this tactic unscrupulously, people will be afraid that one day missiles will suddenly fall on their heads, and a country that is unscrupulous will certainly not be accepted.

    1. Details of the decapitation operation The decapitation operation has always been a favorite tactic used by the Americans, such as the Navy SEALs who once traveled thousands of miles to kill Osama bin Laden, and this year killed an Iranian general with a missile. And in September 2020, the United States once again killed a Syrian named Saiif with a ninja missile on the streets of Syria.

    Saif is a senior member of an armed group, a vassal of al-Qaeda that has been active in Syria for many years. He was driving a car on the street at that time, but suddenly out of nowhere, a missile hit the car, and then killed Saife directly.

    Second, the follow-up incident of this incident The United States did it very quickly, and the target was also very precise, and it did not cause other people's **, I don't know how to evaluate it. One can only sigh at the scientific and technological strength and intelligence capabilities of the United States. In his speech, Trump also said that he had planned the attack, but was stopped by the Department of Defense.

    3. Personal opinion: This attack was very rapid, and the target of the attack was very clear, only hitting a certain side of the car door, directly killing people, and not even the entire vehicle. It is true that the missile technology of the United States is already very advanced. In addition, the Americans acted very quickly, and the United States received very accurate information that the missile dropped on the vehicle and killed the target.

    This is the second case of such a large-scale beheading operation this year. The United States seems to be more arrogant and unfettered than ever, and an unfettered country is the most terrifying. It is hoped that this attack will not lead to the aggravation of the armed conflict.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Panic, because such a random air raid to take the lives of others, the local people do not know when they will die in Huangquan, so they cannot accept such behavior.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Blowing up people with bombs so that they can't find their whole bodies is extremely cruel, which no one can accept.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    It's cruel. The current United States does not have any moral sentiments, as long as it is not good for them, they kill people, it is too cruel.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    ** Always doing things violently like this, hurting innocent lives, as a people, they feel unacceptable and really distressed. They have voiced their hearts and hope that they can pay attention to how to deal with it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because this strategy can easily create a panic mentality, everyone will be afraid that one day it will befall their heads. Naturally, they can't accept it.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Hurry up and be ruthless! The United States launched another decapitation operation, and the target was killed on the spot.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    According to the analysis of relevant experts, the United States is likely to be deterring Iran and proving to Iran its strong military strength in order to achieve the goal of killing chickens and setting an example to the monkeys. Previously, because of the assassination of Iranian General Soleimani by the United States, Iran has repeatedly threatened to attack US military bases in retaliation, and even said that it will assassinate US diplomats in South Africa.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The United States believes that the reason why it will join forces with Israel and other allies in Syria to carry out precise and targeted military strikes on Syria is that Iran and Syria are very close, and for so many years, Iran has deployed a number of forward bases in strategic places such as Damascus through the help of Syria, and these arsenals and missile launch centers pose a great threat to Israel and the United States, so one of the purposes of the frequent bombing and striking of Syrian targets by American and Israeli warplanes is to eradicate Iranian forces.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    A: In order to establish its own prestige in the international community, and to eliminate existing or potential threats, and at this time, this move will help divert domestic contradictions, and based on the above considerations, the US military will launch another decapitation operation.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The United States wants to strike at its opponents and establish its majesty, and their military power is unrivaled in the Middle East.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Of course yes, the Yankee world policeman has done a lot of hurtful things.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Yes, so to speak, but people's technology is indeed relatively strong, and now is the era of fighting technology, and if you are backward, you will be bullied.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The United States dared to behead Saddam Hussein because he found an excuse for Iraq's so-called mass destruction, and at the same time, there were no countries in the world that supported Saddam's regime at that time. Therefore, the United States did not hesitate to launch a war to eliminate Saddam's regime. Syria is different.

    One is that the United States has no excuse for starting a war. The second is that there are many countries behind Syria that support it, such as Russia and many countries in the Middle East. Therefore, the United States does not dare to invade Syria in a rash move.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    This Syria is not Iraq. The backstage boss in Syria is Russia, and it depends on the owner to beat the dog, otherwise it will cause a big disaster.

    If you look ahead, the backstage boss of South Korea was the United States, and the Soviet Union at that time did not dare to directly send troops, so it could only throw this hot potato to China. If the United States and the Soviet Union directly collided, it would basically be a world war.

    If you want to blame it, blame Saddam Hussein for not finding a big boss.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Because Russia helped Syria, the United States did not dare to take a decapitation action lightly.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Because Syria has the resolute support of Russia, the United States cannot do whatever it wants, and can only achieve its goals step by step by supporting the opposition.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The United States is afraid of Russia, Syria is Russia's wedge in the Middle East, it is a strategic place to control the Middle East, Iran is also an ally of Syria, and China also supports Syria, so the United States does not dare to act rashly!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Because the situation is different, the United States attacked Iraq under the banner of Iraq's "mass destruction" and directly targeted Iraq and Saddam, which also involves many things related to the vital interests of the United States, and the sooner the war ends, the lower the cost of the United States and the higher the rate of return. But the situation in Syria is different, first, the Syrian civil war is a war caused by internal contradictions among the people, and direct participation in the war does not have much interest for the United States; Second, the proportion of the United States' foreign economy is relatively large, and the United States is also the world's largest arms dealer, and the longer the war, the more beneficial it is to the United States' foreign affairs; Third, the United States is also happy to see the chaos in the Middle East; on the one hand, they can interfere in the affairs of Syria and even other countries in the Middle East in the name of "world police," and on the other hand, if the Middle East is not united, it will be easier for the United States to manipulate and eliminate the national forces that oppose it.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Because there is no country supporting Saddam Hussein internationally, but Syria is different.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The U.S. decapitation operation against Saddam Hussein proved to be a failure. They don't want to repeat the mistakes of the past.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    The United States is mercenary, and it really does not dare to fall out with Russia when it starts a war for profit!

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    With Russia intervening in Syria from the very beginning, it would be a completely different situation than if Saddam Hussein had fought alone.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Because Saddam Hussein was a heinous sinner, and Syria was nothing more than a conflict with them.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    Because Saddam Hussein made a move to give the name to the United States, and Syria did not.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    To put it simply, the time interval between one and the other is too short, and then other countries will list the United States as a dangerous country, and then the United States will be passive. If something similar to Syria happens in a decade or so, the United States will take a decapitation operation.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    Because the breakthrough he wants to target is different in different places, and the countries are different, the backstage boss in Syria is Russia.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Because the situation in each country is different, the United States is also treated separately!

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Because the chances of a successful decapitation operation are too small, and it may cause discontent in the world.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    If you are wrong the first time, do you want to be wrong again!

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    Hold the bow as strong, and use the arrow as the long. Shoot a man before a horse, capture a thief before capture the king. This ancient poem shows that from ancient times to the present, striking at the enemy's head organ has been an important means of warfare.

    Traditionally, the execution of decapitation operations is the errand of special forces, and special forces penetrate deep into the enemy's depth to destroy soft targets such as command headquarters, intelligence centers, and supply bases, and strike at the opponent's command center is a decapitation operation.

    However, in ordinary wars, all the head organs are relatively well protected, and it is very difficult to defeat the head of the head office. However, the extensive use of precision guidance has made the decapitation operation, which was a relatively difficult tactic in the past, relatively easier. After all, one cruise missile flying over is much easier than the original infiltration and sneak attack, and if one shot is not enough, then two shots, and if it really doesn't work, ten shots.

    The sniper shooting the opposing command staff is also a form of decapitation operation.

    However, the means of decapitation operations are easy, but the requirements for target acquisition capabilities have been increased too much, precision guidance ** first requires a precise positioning, and this precise positioning is very particular, technology, human intelligence must be used, like the American ** Soleimani, that is, the use of technical human intelligence system for relay, until the precise location of Soleimani is determined, the missile is launched, the target is destroyed. And it's not easy to do this kind of uninterrupted surveillance.

    On the one hand, each country is to do a good job of defending its own political figures, and on the other hand, it is also to disperse this political figure, so that people can't let people end it in one pot.

    As for the Americans, of course, they are also worried about the decapitation operation, but the United States has an arrangement for the decapitation operation in the system. The deputy ** hung up, and the chairman of the Senate continued to ......Anyway, someone in the back picked it up. This institutional arrangement is also a common practice in all countries**. And the Americans themselves have the world's best vigilance for their important figures, and it is not easy to behead important American figures.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    Do unto others as you would have them do to you. Decapitation is not in line with international practice compared to conventional military means, and if a country performs a decapitation operation against another country, then the other country will also take reciprocal measures.

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    No matter how great the United States has defense capability, it will not be able to prevent many hostile forces from counterattacking and beheading them.

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    The decapitation operation can only decapitate a specific "enemy general", but cannot destroy its main force. This will also inflict on the opponent's fighting spirit, and under normal circumstances, the opponent will continue to retaliate by unscrupulous means. Therefore, this is a means of doing more harm than good, and it is impossible to be admired, and it will be blamed.

    The original 911 incident was also a kind of decapitation operation, which smashed Huanglong and destroyed it. Isn't this the purpose of the beheading operation?

    Therefore, the United States is also very afraid of the decapitation operation.

  35. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Because the United States is very obsessed with rights, and the position is very obvious, if it is targeted and decapitated, it is easy to lose your life.

  36. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    Because the decapitation operation is to send a special operations squad to behead the enemy's command staff, for the United States, if ** is decapitated, then the United States will be in chaos.

  37. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    Because what the United States is best at is decapitation operations, because it knows too well and knows the horror of decapitation operations, so it is afraid that other countries will carry out decapitation operations against it.

  38. Anonymous users2024-01-05

    Capture the thief and capture the king first, if you have the ability, you can get rid of the boss first, and the dragons will be cleaned up without a leader.

  39. Anonymous users2024-01-04

    Capture the thief and capture the king first. It has a deterrent effect on the opponent. But that would provoke even greater revolt.

  40. Anonymous users2024-01-03

    This is a long-standing pretext for the United States to use Iran's human rights violations. Attempts to kill the "culprits" of human rights violations.

  41. Anonymous users2024-01-02

    Opponents are attacked by all means, even by terrorist means.

  42. Anonymous users2024-01-01

    He finally became a **. Of course, you have to live the addiction of being a **... Hit whoever you want,。。 It's so cool...

  43. Anonymous users2023-12-31

    Now the American people are also dissatisfied with Trump, and Plump's intention is probably to provoke a war and try to be re-elected.

  44. Anonymous users2023-12-30

    The decapitation mode does not change the entire course of the war, at most it will be affected in the early stages of war planning, formulation, and attack.

    As we all know, the leadership body is set up: one positive and several pairs. One United States**, there will be a vice-president**, and when both ** encounter accidents, the parliament will take over ** to exercise power.

    Even if the head or commander of the army is beheaded, he will be immediately replaced by a deputy. However, when exercising their powers, the deputy may face the following problems: immovable command and ineffective command.

    Of course, the situation will change as soon as it is officially announced that the deputy will be converted to a regular or a deputy. The war will continue and will not change course by beheading.

    The mode of modern warfare is nothing more than air raids, decapitation, and the stationing of land forces, the purpose of which is to reduce one's own personnel**. The decapitation only delays the stationing, causing a short-term impact on the enemy, and as a result, a conventional war has to be fought!

  45. Anonymous users2023-12-29

    It's purely to get this, it won't change, now arguing about the mode, it's just a form of special operations, but if it really gets to the point of fighting, the decapitation operation, in fact, can't change anything, to put it bluntly, go sideways, just on the certificate you will change in strategy, nothing has changed much.

Related questions
8 answers2024-06-12

1) The Gulf War.

The legitimacy of this war is indisputable, not because of United Nations resolutions, but because Iraq first launched the aggression, and the United States has a vital interest in the invaded country and has been invited and supported by the invaded country and its allies (the six Gulf countries). >>>More

10 answers2024-06-12

Dear users, hello!

How to start a poll after you know how to ask a question. This is your question, please see if there are 3 lines like this below your question: >>>More

52 answers2024-06-12

For a long time, many people have all kinds of doubts about the United States landing on the moon, and they even hope that the United States can come up with evidence of the moon landing, so why do these people doubt the fact that the United States has landed on the moon. It has been almost half a century since the last American moon landing, and there has been no mention of the moon landing plan until now. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-12

Is there anything new in your question? Yours was taken? Know that you will be notified as soon as possible in the form of pop-up bubbles on the main pages. A bubble will appear in the top right corner of the page when you sign in. >>>More

4 answers2024-06-12

After the visa refusal, it is recommended that the applicant analyze the specific reasons for the refusal and apply again, and the information must be true and complete, if the interview is not smooth, it is still possible to refuse the visa.