-
1) The Gulf War.
The legitimacy of this war is indisputable, not because of United Nations resolutions, but because Iraq first launched the aggression, and the United States has a vital interest in the invaded country and has been invited and supported by the invaded country and its allies (the six Gulf countries).
But the United States made a mistake in this war: he did not fully fulfill his obligations as a victorious country. First of all, the war was not clearly announced on what day it would end, which laid a lot of unclear questions about international relations after that. Secondly, after the no-fly zone was demarcated, it did not re-establish order in the defeated country, but passively retained a hostile regime, which is unheard of in the history of warfare.
Although there is no shortage of examples in history of victors retaining local power, for the first time a hostile regime was retained; Thirdly, there are no clear arrangements for the international status of the defeated States, or some of the arrangements are implemented in a vague manner.
2) Kosovo War.
This is an illegitimately war. This is because, according to established rules, it lacks sufficient justification for its activation. However, this war was universally embraced and affirmed.
So, some scholars argue that the originators of this war are trying to establish a new rule ("A country may be waged at war when its domestic policies seriously violate basic human rights. And the endorsement and affirmation of the international community has established this rule to some extent. In my own opinion, it remains to be seen whether this rule has been firmly established.
3) The war in Afghanistan.
The war was legitimate, but its legitimacy was questioned by the sufficiency and reliability of the evidence. This is a pity.
It is reassuring to know that this time the United States has not made the same mistakes it made in the Gulf War, and that it has re-established order in the defeated country, while at the same time fully respecting local traditions.
4) A possible second war against Iraq.
The question of whether the United States can properly grasp and use this possible war will have sufficient legitimacy. As a defeated country in the Gulf War, Iraq was imposed obligations to eliminate mass destruction**, and the United States has evidence of its non-compliance. In fact, as the victorious country in the last war, the United States has the right to replace Iraq** or force it to abandon its hostile position, so any hostile expression of Iraq** can be a reason for another war.
But time wears down this right, and the longer it drags on, the less legitimate it becomes.
-
The ancestors of the United States are white, that is, descendants of "Anglo, Saxon". To put it bluntly, they are the descendants of the barbarians. Not descendants of civilized people at all.
1. The purpose of the war launched by the United States:
It may be because of the ambition to secure world domination, to wage war; It may be because of the economic crisis, in order to make money for domestic arms dealers, drive the development of the whole country, and reduce the unemployment rate; It is possible to wage war for the sake of resources and for the battleground of the soldiers.
2. The recent withdrawal of US troops from Iraq (this is an unjust war, and the anti-US forces will never be wiped out by the United States, and the US military has consumed too much, is poor, and has been forced to withdraw its troops), and then it will inevitably be stationed in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is a battleground and a very important strategic location. By occupying Afghanistan, you can gain deterrence against Russia and China.
Whether to beat you or not, someone has already decided to do it.
3. The gains and losses of the United States. From an economic point of view, it was a loss. But people are not stupid, there must be something to earn.
For example: prestige (which makes some countries frightened when they hear about the United States), territory, markets, resources, and so on. The specific money earned there, only the United States ** knows it in its heart.
Regarding the war in Iraq, it was a major decision-making mistake made by George W. Bush. In this war, the United States suffered a huge loss, and it can be said that it was not easy to waste its advantage over Russia and the United States from 30 years to less than 20 years. Coupled with the slowdown in the development speed of the United States and the increase in the development speed of China and Russia, the leading advantage of the United States will be even lower.
Specifically, the United States has lost a lot of people (an American is very valuable, hehe), too much equipment. At the same time, the prestige of the United States in the Islamic world has decreased again (legend has it that Transformers 2 was filmed to increase the prestige of the United States). Benefit?
George W. Bush has benefited, and how refreshing it is to fight. But the United States has lost.
-
Too much! You think so too!
It's all about consolidating his hegemony and increasing his influence, and of course energy, and some of them are political deals, for example, some of them can't get anything, and he has what he got from the war to negotiate! Wait a minute!
Of course, it's a loss, and it's hard for you to know that the financial turmoil was caused by the war in the United States? Since the beginning of the Vietnam War, the United States has been in the red, but it is still waiting for the war, so it uses its international credit to take out loans everywhere, and then go to war after taking out the loan, Vietnam, the Gulf, Kosovo, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc.! After the loan, after the loan, the war is to burn money, plus the global economy is on track, all the funds are connected, so the subprime mortgage crisis that broke out in the United States ignited the financial crisis, and because of the war Since the Vietnam War, the United States has always been a fiscal deficit!
Although wars can sometimes boost the labor force of the people, they can go wrong over time.
So we should yearn for peace and cherish peace!
-
1.The United States has launched wars out of its own interests, and the purpose behind the several wars fought by the United States in the Middle East is actually to control the oil in the Middle East and contain some neighboring countries, such as Russia.
2.Controlling oil is the lifeblood of the world.
3.With the exception of Iraq, all other wars have been profitable.
-
The United States is the hegemon of the world, how can he lose money.
-
It should be once or twice, because the United States knows that he himself is a hooligan. He probably wouldn't have launched too many attacks on China, and besides, the last time he was deeply moved by life in China9. There will definitely be no more aggression against China.
Besides, China is now so developed. Then I don't dare to come.
-
1. War of Independence (1775-1783): The American War of Independence was the first war of independence in American history, aimed at establishing an independent American state from the British.
2. Spanish-American War (1898): The war was fought to liberate Cuba and gain key overseas territories such as Puerto Rico, **, the Philippines, etc.
3. World War I (1917-1918): The United States supported the Allies in World War I.
4. World War II (1941-1945): The United States was one of the Allied forces in World War II and participated in the wars against Japan and Germany.
5. Korean War (1950-1953): The United States invaded the Korean Peninsula.
6. Vietnam War (1955-1975): Vietnam War.
7. Gulf War (1990-1991): This war was a military operation against Iraq by a multinational coalition led by the United States after Iraq's invasion of Kuwait and chaos.
The United States, as the world's-stirring stick, has not been established for a long time, and there have been many wars.
-
After the Cold War, the United States launched wars such as the Afghanistan War and the Iraq WarBoth wars were fought in the name of counter-terrorism. The 911 incident shook the United States. At that time, the U.S. treasury was full, its comprehensive national strength was at its peak, and unilateralism was in vogue.
In order to demonstrate the prestige of the world's only superpower, and to respond to the security anxiety of the people at home, the United States urgently needs to take retaliatory action.
Topographic features of the United StatesThe terrain of the United States is varied, with high terrain in the west and low in the east. The East Coast coastal region has coastal plains, wide in the south and narrow in the north, extending all the way to New Jersey, and there are also some glacial sedimentary plains in places like Long Island. Behind the coastal plain is an undulating foothill strip that stretches to the 1,830-meter-high Appalachian Mountains in North Carolina and New Hampshire.
To the west of the Appalachian Mountains is the Great Plains of the United States, which is relatively flat and is home to the Great Lakes and the Mississippi-Missouri River Basin, the fourth largest river basin in the world. West of the Mississippi River, the topography of the inner plains begins to rise, eventually entering the vast and sparsely topographically characterized Great Plains of the central United States.
The United States and the Soviet Union competed against each other, did not engage in direct conflict, and used indirect means, including espionage warfare, to engage each other.
There is no benefit, our country always thinks that the Americans are taking advantage of Iraq and Afghanistan. Maybe it's because of the cultural differences between the two countries. The misunderstanding is deeper. >>>More
What is difficult to say depends on whether China will be selected or not.
Occupy the Chinese market, try to control China's economic lifeline, open the closed door to China, and shake this great power that has dominated the East for thousands of years. Although the opium flowing into China is very large, it does not constitute dumping, because its ** is not reduced because of the surge in quantity, but the same as ****, the reason is that Britain has to levy a very heavy tax on the profits from overseas sales of opium, and a large part of the British tax is obtained from the sale of opium, and China's Qing ** also strongly opposed the inflow of opium, so opium merchants were levied very heavy tariffs, so the opium did not fall but rose, and even smuggled opium into China. In order to make greater profits on opium, the opium dealers and the British had to forcefully open the door to China and use the topic to play a reactionary opium war.
Similarities: both have gone through the stages from colonialism to independent independence. >>>More