Isn t the collar a handprint made by yourself, nor is it an effect made by your wife?

Isn't the home page of the two that you hit by yourself and not the effect of your wife? The noodles are not made by oneself and are not made by one's wife, and of course the handprints do not take effect. If all such mudras are valid, then everyone can deceive and deceive.

When you make a strip, you must have your own handprint.

According to the regulations, the collar is a certificate for the person to receive something, and it should be valid if you make your own handprint. Because there are exceptions, the wife can receive it on his behalf, and the derived acquaintances can also receive it on his behalf, and the collar strips he plays are also counted. In this way, there is a problem, and someone sees the opportunity to fish in troubled waters.

There are many cases where others don't give it to you, and they say they have already given it. If you have to follow the rules, you will reduce the contradictions.

If your wife fights by herself, then it is actually equivalent to the debt incurred by your wife, and you should also be asked to repay the debt together.

The collar is not made by himself, nor is it made by his wife, and this kind of collar is invalid if it does not take effect.

If one of the husband and wife beats, and the wife can do the work on behalf of the wife, it can take effect.

You didn't beat it, but who? Isn't it your mom and dad? Do you know the key? Where is the collar now? That's the fundamental. If it's in your home, then there's no need to say anything.

If it is not the handprint of the principal of one's own handprint, then it is invalid for oneself.

If you don't know it, if you know, that's another matter.

Could it be that someone else deliberately used your name to make it, in that case, call the police to deal with it.

Situation, specific treatment.

The collar is not made by himself, and the handprint is not made by his wife, and it takes effect during the marriage.

Isn't the collar a craft made by yourself, nor is it the zodiac that your wife plays? The collar is not a craft made by yourself, nor is it made by your wife, and it should take effect.

In standardizing and adjusting marriage and family relations, morality and law are indispensable, and only by adhering to the law and at the same time binding morality can we make millions of marriages and families more harmonious and beautiful, and society more civilized and progressive. Morality is the foundation, the law is the guarantee, and the law is not omnipotent. If the scope of moral adjustment is incorporated into legal norms, the authority of morality will be reduced, and the implementation of the law will lose its foundation. Morality that is not supported by the law will also be greatly diminished.

The relationship between the two is interdependent and transformative, and only by organically combining the two can we better play their positive role.

The family is an ethical entity, and the law that regulates marriage and family relations is an important law with distinct ethical colors, and the obligations it stipulates are also moral requirements, such as the freedom of marriage, which is a basic principle of the marriage law, and all forms of arranged coercion or other acts that interfere with the freedom of marriage are illegal, and if violence is used, it violates the criminal law and will be investigated for criminal responsibility, which is the function of the law. At the same time, the practice of freedom of marriage means that love is the premise, and affection is the moral basis for the conclusion and maintenance of marriage. If the affection has disappeared, then it would be wise to end the death marriage, and it would be immoral to force the maintenance of an emotionless marriage.

However, the breakdown of the relationship is caused by the negligence of one party, and the corresponding responsibility should be borne according to the circumstances, including moral responsibility and legal responsibility. The breakdown of the relationship is a legal condition for granting a divorce, and if one of the spouses is at fault, some of them will bear administrative and civil liability, and some will be investigated for criminal liability for violating the criminal law. This hierarchical approach reflects the different roles of law and morality.