Mr. Whiteson s essay, if I were Mr. Whiteson s student essay 400 words

After studying the text "My Best Teacher", I felt that Mr. Whiteson's teaching method was very unique, and I thought it was okay to teach students in this way.

If I were a student of Mr. Whiteson, and Mr. Whiteson taught us about the animal "cat mole" in that science class, we would have scored 0 on the quiz we had done based on our class notes. It turned out that everything that Mr. Whiteson had said about this animal was made up. When I know what Mr. Whiteson really means, I feel that Mr. Whiteson's unique teaching method allows us to judge the truth from the false.

If I were a student of Mr. Whiteson, it would have been a great adventure for me to take his science class. Every time I take a science class, I have to take it seriously, and I have to think carefully about the questions that Mr. Whitson asks and what he says.

Do you want Mr. Whiteson to write an essay or an essay about him?

If there was a mistake in your book, would you bring it up? If you found something that might not be right, would you explore it? I don't know what choice you're going to make, but I know I'm going to propose, to explore, to discover, to prove everything with the facts, because I can't know the truth until then.

In life, there are mistakes in books, as long as you think about it, maybe mistakes will come quietly. Then you have to offer to correct it. It's actually quite simple.

Have you ever heard of two iron balls hitting the ground at the same time? Galileo thought that Aristotle, the authoritative figure who was trusted at the time, was wrong and refuted it. Galileo thought that two iron balls of different weights would hit the ground at the same time, and he made an experiment to prove that he was right!

If you were Galileus at that time, would you do that? If not, you're wrong, and authority doesn't mean it's right. And if you question it, argue it, don't listen to the wind or the rain.

In life, neither books nor authorities are always right, in fact, nothing is always right, as long as you find out, you have to bring it up to prove whether it is right or wrong.

Suppose I were a student of Mr. Whiteson.

If I had been a student of Mr. Whiteson, I would have been in that class and I would have taken the test. What will happen to me?

In class, seeing the teacher speak so vividly, I, like other students, would pick up my notes. When it was time for the test, I would open my notebook and write down everything I had written down on the test paper. I would feel weird when I knew I was getting a zero.

Because, I always wrote down everything that Mr. Whiteson said in my notebook, and then wrote it in the test paper, and I would get zero marks for what you wrote down in your notebook? I'll go to Mr. Whiteson. And I heard Teacher Hotson say:

Everything about the cat hedgehog beast was made up by me on purpose. This animal has never existed. So, all the answers you write down in your notebook are incorrect, and you should not score them?

I would get angry and feel that Mr. Whiteson didn't deserve to be a teacher because he teased the students like that. But if you think about it: can't we question what the teacher said?

In the future, we must know whether everything the teacher says is true or not, so that we can listen to the class seriously.

The teacher may not always be right, just like our teacher Deng, who is very knowledgeable, but he was still questioned a few times by our classmates. We must not be superstitious about books, not superstitious about authority, think independently, and learn to judge and question.

I would be honored if I were a student of Mr. Whiteson, because Mr. Whiteson was a good teacher, and he said, "Don't be superstitious about books, and don't be superstitious about authority." The two "don't be superstitious" in this sentence emphasize a spirit of skepticism and the need to acquire knowledge through independent thinking.

I felt that Mr. Whiteson was "my best teacher" in the following ways: first, "he was a man of great character, with a unique teaching method and often unexpected actions"; Second, Mr. Whiteson's teaching method is unique, he teaches students that "every one should have the ability to think for himself, and to judge the truth of things independently, and at the same time to have the ability to doubt," and "not to let one's mind sleep too much, but to point out problems as soon as they are discovered; Third, Mr. Whiteson's ability to think independently and his skeptical spirit of science are respected and praised by "I." He made me and my classmates go from not understanding him to accepting him, and Mr. Whiteson was a good teacher from these three aspects.

This article mainly writes about Mr. Whiteson's vivid lesson to the students, a non-existent creature, a painstaking truth, a method of learning, and it is no wonder that the students are full of affection and admiration for him.

How interesting it would have been if I were a student of Mr. Whiteson!

If I were a student of Mr. Whiteson, I would be proud of myself.

If there was a mistake in your book, would you bring it up? Suppose you.

If you find out which authority person may be wrong, you will explore it.

Now? I don't know what choice you're going to make, but I know I'm going to propose, to explore, to discover, to prove everything with the facts, because I can't know the truth until then.

In life, there are mistakes in books, as long as you think about it, maybe the mistake will come quietly, and then you have to raise it and correct it

It's actually quite simple.

Have you ever heard of two iron balls hitting the former Changdi at the same time? Galileo thought.

Aristotle, the most trusted authority at the time, was wrong.

Galileo thought that two iron balls of different weights would hit the ground at the same time, and made an experiment to prove that he was right! Suppose you are the Ga.

Neatly, would you do that? You're wrong if you don't. Authority doesn't.

It's right, and if you question it, argue it, don't listen.

Wind is rain In life, books and authority are not always correct, facts.

Nothing is always right on the surface, as soon as you find out, bring it up.

Come and see if it's right or wrong

We have to hold on to the truth and let courage be our leader, let.

Exploration has become our consistent style, and so the truth has come with it

It is better to believe in a book than to have no book at all! Look at books and "authority" from a dialectical perspective, and the so-called "authority" is not the spokesperson of truth.

Don't blindly worship authority, find a way to deny authority and hit authority!!

Banzai! Long live the Great Proletarian Revolution!!

I actually don't agree that open books are beneficial. Not all books fill people's minds; Reading books without ideas is a waste of time. Similarly, the so-called "authority" is uneven.

A person is always making progress in learning, and authority is also gradually becoming a leader in a certain field in learning, which is just a process. Comparatively speaking, your knowledge accumulation in a certain field is temporarily inferior to "authority", and your contribution in this field is also very small, but these do not prevent you from using an objective and rational attitude to face the "divine reform authority" rubber blind brigade. Authority is not infallible, it is a human being, and it will always make mistakes.

Facing "authority" with questions. Rather than facing it with adoration.