Are the J 10 and J 11 the same type of aircraft?

Yes, J-10 good.

The J-11 is a product of China's localization of the Soviet Su-27.

The J-10 is a self-developed fighter that China attaches great importance to, and it is better than the J-11.

The J-10 is a medium-sized fighter of the third generation, and its combat performance should not be inferior to that of the F-16C and Mirage 2000-5

Not the same kind. The J-11 was developed on the Su-27 fighter.

The J-10 is the first third-generation fighter developed by China. It is also the world's most advanced fighter. Only the engine is Russian.

It depends on what you say.

The J-11 is a domestic version of the Su-27, and the J-10 is self-developed.

The J-11 is a double engine, and the J-10 is a single engine.

However, both are air superiority fighters.

Personally, I think that the positioning of J-11 air superiority is very sad, and the J-11 can only fight with J-10 in terms of maneuverability when there is less fuel.

Of course it's not the same kind of fighter! J-10 is the technology of the 80s to learn from the Israeli lion cubs, and according to the results of their 20 years of painstaking research, it is an advanced three-and-a-half-generation fighter, and the J-11 is a domestic version of the Su-27, which can also be said to be an upgraded version of the Su-27!

Not the same kind, the J-10 is a copy of Israel's Cub fighter, while the J-11 is a domestic version of the Su-27.

J-11 is a heavy annihilation, and J-10 is a light annihilation. In terms of combat effectiveness, the J-10 is only about 70% of the J-10 at most.

The J-10 is a multi-functional fighter similar to the F16, and the J-11 (Su27) is an air superiority fighter that mainly competes for air supremacy.

Although the J-10 is a single engine and the J-11 is a double engine, in terms of mobility, the J-10 is superior to the J-11.

In terms of flight performance, the J-10's instantaneous maneuverability is better than that of the J-11, and the continuous maneuverability J-11 has the advantage, for example, the J-10 has a fast speed and can turn sharp corners, while the J-11 can continuously turn at high speed without losing speed. The advantage of instantaneous maneuverability, combined with the domestically produced second-generation helmet sights and the latest PL-9, is a lethal move, because there is no possibility for the two sides to continue to circle in air combat. In terms of on-board equipment, the J-10, as a latecomer, also took advantage.

The data link of the Su-27 is not synchronized in real time, and there are intermittent seconds to xx seconds depending on the data transmission requirements. Of course, there is no data link that is fully synchronized in real time, but the data link of the J-10 is obviously better than that of the J-11. If the two sides also operate under the command of early warning aircraft or under the condition of multi-aircraft cooperation, the J-10 will get the information in a more timely manner.

The Su-27's radar warning can only show that it is threatened, and cannot distinguish where the threat is coming from, which is not as good as the J-10. The early Su-27 used a lot of instrument signal display, such as what a certain letter represents, and so on, while the J-10 comprehensive display is more intuitive. So, while saying 5:

Legends such as 0 are no longer convincing, but it should not be outrageous to say that the J-10 is at least not inferior to the Su-27.

In terms of combat radius, firepower, and combat mission, it is J11

But the J10 is a light fighter, and you can't compare it to a heavy fighter.

Heavy aircraft have an advantage over light aircraft due to their innate load loss, travel, radar power, and mission diversity.

J-10 is China's independent research and development of the first third-generation (Russia called the fourth-generation) fighter, with independent intellectual property rights, in the process of research and development has accumulated a lot of experience, and trained a large number of aviation talents, its maneuverability is very outstanding, can complete the famous"Cobra maneuver";J-11 is China's improvement on the basis of the Russian Su-27, the Su-27 series is a classic of fighters, which has outstanding performance, but it was developed in the 80s, so its avionics system is relatively backward, and China replaced its avionics system after the introduction of Su-27, and used a large number of composite materials to develop J-11, and there is currently the latest J-11B

J-10 and J-11 are both Chinese fighters with excellent performance, both sides have their own strengths, but J-11 is a heavy fighter, with two engines, and the range is 2 times that of J-10, so in terms of comprehensive combat power, J-11 is still better than J-10, and China's most advanced fighter is J-11B, whose combat power is J-10 times.

J-11 is almost a complete copy of the Su-27, avionics or materials have not changed much, at the level of the 80s, J-11B when the J-11 upgraded, avionics, fly-by-wire control, materials, etc. have made an essential leap.

J-10 is a new type of fighter of the same era as J-10B, the materials are certainly much better than the early J-11, the performance in addition to the difference caused by the aerodynamic layout, it should be much better, especially the J-10 has undergone a variety of transformations to become an outstanding multi-functional fighter, J-11 is a typical air superiority.

Therefore, I personally believe that the performance of the J-11 of the early Su-27 complete copy will not be better than that of the J-10.

All are third-generation fighters. The J11 is heavy and the J10 is light.

Or to put it this way: J11 is F15 and J10 is F16

Which one you like depends on your own preference.

2 are used together. Different functions can come in handy.

The avionics system J-10 is better, because the prototype of the J-11, the Su-27, is a relatively old fighter. From the point of view of maneuverability, each must have its own merits, because the J-10 is a light fighter, and the J-11 is a heavy fighter. ** The upper Jj 10 also has an advantage.

In general, both J-10 and J-11 are third-generation aircraft with outstanding performance, and J-10 is slightly better than J-11, because J-10 was launched decades later than the J-11 prototype, so the technology is relatively new.

The combat missions are different, it doesn't matter which one is better.

Each has its own strengths, and the J-11 is a Flanker heavy multi-role fighter, which is localized by the Su-27. The J-10 is an air superiority fighter developed by China itself. If you fight in close quarters, J-10 will have a slight upper hand.

The J-11 is a multi-role fighter-bomber, which mainly performs ground attacks and escorts for bombers. The J-10 is mainly carried out by air interception and seizure of air supremacy. The tasks are different. Foreign analysis: China's J-11B is currently the most advanced fighter of the Chinese Air Force.