Regarding the philosophically lovable, it is not necessarily credible, and the credible is not neces

The contradiction between the credible and the lovely in learning", that is, the lover, not necessarily credible, the credible not necessarily cute... In fact, it is still a tangle between reason and emotion... I once wrote such a sentence:

obliquely looks at the ancient and modern times, and is commenting on the two sons of black and white. "。。。It doesn't matter if it's credible or cute, what matters is the classics he left behind...

Those who have become great careers and scholars in ancient and modern times must pass through three realms: 'Last night the west wind withered the green tree. Go up to the tall building alone and look at the end of the world'.

This first realm also. 'The belt gradually widened, and he did not regret it, and he made people haggard for Yi. 'This second realm also.

Cute people are not necessarily credible. Anything that feels cute is usually the work of one's own emotional side.

Credible people are not necessarily cute. Credible things are usually their own rational side, as there is a saying: good medicine is bitter, and advice is contrary to the ear. It's not cute.

The things of romance are literally embellished, and people will think that the characters in it are cute. It is an attribute that belongs to people who have given it, and this is historically questionable! Is it real or imaginary?

But on the other hand, something credible isn't cute, why? To use an analogy, the superior person in ** took a knife and slashed at the head of the opponent's soldier, and suddenly, his brain splashed and blood flowed on the spot. Is there anything cute in this scene?

Is there any use in life? Hehe, I just hope it's a romance. That's scary.

Philosophy is, recommend to you (Osho) books.

It's not that the upstairs is saying something that is contrary to the ear. Wang Guowei's sentence should be understood in this way. The untrustworthy refers to the irrational ideas of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, which take life and will as the core of philosophy, and the starting point is internal, so it is easy to resonate with people's emotional experience, so it is said to be cute; But such ideas tend to be empirical and introspective—irrationalist—and lack a logical system as rigorous as rationalist philosophical thought, and are therefore not credible.

The credible is not lovable, referring to rationalist philosophical ideas such as Kant, which are based on the external world, that is, to find a reliable basis for the world through rational means, with a rigorous logical system, and thus credible; But because the starting point of this philosophy is external, it is easy to feel indifferent rational speculation, rather than emotional resonance, so it is not lovely.

However, this is not to say that rationalism and irrationalism are superior or inferior, in fact, both occupy an important place in the history of Western philosophy, so there is nothing right or wrong, but the characteristics of the two philosophical ideas are different.

Similar to "good words are good for deeds, good medicine is good for sickness", the words of a person who is good at patting on the back and praising you will certainly make you happy, but he is by no means an object you can trust; A person who often tells the truth, although he will not please you, is a trustworthy person. What is often easy to understand is not where the true meaning lies, but only what surrounds in the imagination and has been tested is the true meaning.

The above is good, but there is no literal translation, it is a quotation.