Reading answers for bathing in the dirt, Dirt reading answers

In 2012, the Olympic Games will be held in London, England. On the site of the Olympic venues, the British made an incredible decision: to bring the Olympic Park.

Built on a junkyard and abandoned site in Stratford, east London.

According to the survey, the pollutants on this land include oil, gasoline, tar, cyanide.

Arsenic, lead and very low levels of radioactive material.

A large amount of toxic industrial solvents have penetrated into the soil.

Thinking about it another way, in today's highly developed industrial machinery, there is no need to worry about the location of the Olympic venues even if they are located in such a place. Because the solution was so simple, the British seemed stupid to use excavators and trucks to dig up the contaminated soil and transport it elsewhere, and then bring in clean soil to backfill the site. But instead of choosing this simple method, they resorted to the easy and complex methods of bathing the polluted soil.

According to a test report.

He said that the cleaned soil would not be a problem even if it was accidentally swallowed by a child.

The British bathed in mud, which was considered a remarkable feat. This is remarkable not because of how advanced their technological means are today, but because they have started an attempt to make up for the human debt to the environment: that is, to bring the environment that they have defiled back to life at any cost.

This may be seen as naïve and ridiculous, but in fact, it is a great responsibility that is overlooked by human beings.

"Bathing in the soil" is a figurative statement, and the specific process is:

Dig up the toxic soil – transport it into the soil "washing machine" – and separate out the heavy metals. (2 points).

2.What role do the data presented in the paragraph play in the process? (2 points).

Please you from the explanatory text.

From the linguistic point of view, the punctuated words in the paragraph are briefly analyzed. (3 points).

Based on the content of the article and one's own inference, two of the following statements are incorrect (3 points).

a.The reason why the British have done this is incredible when it comes to choosing the site for the Olympic venues is about square kilometre.

The land was heavily polluted by decades of industrial production.

b.Using excavators and trucks to dig up the contaminated soil and transport it to other places, and then bring in clean soil to backfill the site, is indeed a simple and easy way to do it.

c.The high level of technological development has enabled the British to do something remarkable that no other country can do, to bring the defiled environment back to life.

d.This expository essay tells us that the real environmental protection should be when human beings completely admit their mistakes, completely wash away the dirt we bring to nature, and restore it to its original state.

e.In real life, each of us should enhance our awareness of environmental protection and start from small things, such as household waste.

To be classified, waste batteries should be specially collected and disposed of, and the use of plastic bags should be reduced.

Answer. 1. Separate the gravel and clean and refine the pollutants.

2. Specifically, accurately and intuitively illustrate the number of investigations and the large amount of work.

3. "Large" means a lot, indicating a large number, which shows the degree of soil pollution here, and reflects the characteristics of accurate and rigorous expository language.

4、bc

1."Bathing in the soil" is a figurative way of saying that the toxic soil is dug up – transported into the soil "washing machine" – and the heavy metals are separated. (2 points).

2.What role did the data presented in paragraph (5) play in the narrative process? (2 points).

3.Please provide a brief analysis of the punctuated words in paragraph (2) from the point of view of the language of the expository text. (3 points).

4.Based on the content of the article and one's own inference, two of the following statements are incorrect (3 points).

a. It is inconceivable that the British have chosen the site for the Olympic venues because this area of about one square kilometer has been heavily polluted by decades of industrial production.

b. It is indeed a simple and easy way to use excavators and trucks to dig up the contaminated soil and transport it to other places, and then transport clean soil to backfill the site.

c. The high development of scientific and technological means has enabled the British to do a remarkable thing that other countries cannot do, and to revive the defiled environment.

d. This expository essay tells us that the real environmental protection should be that human beings completely admit their mistakes, completely cleanse the dirt we bring to nature, and restore it to its original state.

e. In real life, each of us should enhance our awareness of environmental protection and start from small things, such as sorting and disposing of domestic garbage, collecting and treating waste batteries, and reducing the use of plastic bags.

1.(2 points) Separate the gravel and clean the contaminants to extract the contaminants.

2.(2 points) Concrete, accurate, and intuitive (1 point) illustrates the number of surveys and the amount of work (1 point).

3.(3 points) "Abundant" means a lot, indicating a large number (1 point), which here indicates the degree of soil pollution (1 point), which reflects the accuracy and rigor of the explanatory language.

4.(3 points, 1 point for one, 3 points for two) BC (B is wrong in "good"; Item C is wrong with "the development of scientific and technological means", which should be "real environmental awareness").

What role did the data presented in paragraph (5) play in the narrative process?

In the shadows; Widely known;

Although it is raining, there is a warm current surging in my heart, and it is only because there is love in my heart!

If it weren't for the hard work of our teachers, how would we be able to thrive?

Sparring partners, medical staff, coaches, team leaders.

Medal-winning athletes.

This is a figurative sentence that vividly illustrates that they would not have won awards without sparring partners, medical personnel, coaches, and team leaders who were silently helping these sports. Just as safflower has no soil, it is impossible to bloom.

4.These sparring partners, medical personnel, coaches, and team leaders who work silently, aren't they all dirt?

What is your understanding of the above sentence?

This quote is a metaphor that illustrates that athletes cannot succeed without these people quietly helping them.

These silent work of the sparring partner. Medical personnel. Instructor. Leader. Aren't they all dirt, write your understanding.

The fourth paragraph is to the effect: Behind every successful person there must be an unknown person to support him.

It should probably be, (*hee-hee......

1.(1) obscurity; (2) a household name; (3) Meticulous.

2.(1) How could there be human life without soil?

2) Aren't these people who have made selfless contributions to humanity just as great? 3."Flowers" refers to athletes who have won Olympic medals; "Dirt" refers to medical staff, coaches, team leaders, etc., who work silently;

4.The third natural section: the soil selflessly and silently dedicates itself to humanity.

Fourth natural paragraph: Behind every hero and advanced person, there are many people who support their work in obscurity.

5.Obscurity, selfless dedication.

6.Slightly 7Teachers, cleaners, etc.

The teachers stand on the podium every day to cultivate the pillars of the motherland, although the world is full of peaches and plums, but they still water the future flowers of the motherland day after day;

The cleaners cleaned the streets as always, regardless of the wind, rain, cold and heat, and although they were very tired and hard, they gave us a clean and beautiful urban environment.