-
Unreasonable,,, unreasonable,,, unreasonable,,, is your improper operation?? Drowsy driving?? Or a flat tire??
There is always a reason,,, it is good to drive, if it is handled normally, it will generally not roll over,,, as for the company to let the driver repair the car or something, it is even more nonsense,,, whether the insurance bought by the vehicle is fully insured? ? There is a problem with the company's management, the company's vehicles are all full insurance,,, cargo damage insurance, spontaneous combustion insurance, driver insurance, etc., and the only thing ,,, do without saying that the driver is compensated for repairing the car, is to punish the driver, deduct the bonus or something,,, and the others are nothing,,, personal opinions are for reference only.
-
Specifically, it depends on how the company stipulates when signing the contract, and the normal process is insurance. Generally speaking, it is borne by the company, after all, it is inevitable to drive and scratch, if there is something wrong with the person or car, the employing company will bear it.
-
Didn't you buy insurance for your car, and you don't need to fix it if you prove yourself right as an employee!
-
Generally, the company car is fully insured, as long as it is not operated by humans, the company will not let the driver take the money to repair the car. As long as the person is fine, you must pay attention to safety when driving, after all, no one wants to roll over. Be sure to pay attention to safety when driving in the future.
-
Vehicle drivers are a high-risk industry, and traffic accidents cannot be prevented. In order to alleviate the losses caused by accidents, the state stipulates that vehicles must purchase compulsory traffic insurance, and encourages the purchase of commercial insurance, which includes vehicle loss insurance. Once a unilateral accident occurs in your own vehicle, the loss caused by the vehicle can be claimed by the car damage insurance, if there is an accident for the company, the driver will bear the cost of the car damage, which is unreasonable.
-
This kind of situation is obviously caused by not paying attention to the road situation while driving, the chassis of the vehicle was hit by a foreign object on the road, and the incident was not stopped for inspection, let alone paid attention to the central control warning, even after the engine overheated and turned off, regardless of the direct restart. Therefore, there is an unshirkable responsibility for the damage to the vehicle.
Although the employee accidentally damages the equipment at work, he should not bear the cost of repair. However, if the employee ignores the operation specifications and causes damage to the equipment, the enterprise has the right to make a decision on financial penalties. It's just that the leader of your unit doesn't understand the law and has found the wrong reason.
-
Legal analysis: The driver, as the first person responsible, will of course have to pay compensation. But nowadays vehicles generally have full insurance, so the insurance company will be responsible for the claim. If you don't have insurance, the driver is fine.
Legal basis: Article 1191 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Where the staff of an employer causes damage to others due to the performance of their work tasks, the employer shall bear tort liability. After the employer bears tort liability, it may seek compensation from the employee who has intentionally or grossly negligently.
During the period of labor dispatch, if the dispatched staff member causes damage to others due to the performance of work tasks, the employing unit accepting the labor dispatch shall bear tort liability; If the labor dispatch unit is at fault, it shall bear the corresponding responsibility.
-
Legal analysis: According to the relevant laws of China, if the overturning of the truck is caused by the driver, causing economic losses to the employer, and the labor contract stipulates that the driver can be required to compensate for the loss.
Legal basis: Article 16 of the Interim Provisions on Payment of Wages? If the employee causes economic losses to the employer due to the employee's own reasons, the employer may require the employee to compensate for the economic losses in accordance with the provisions of the labor contract.
Compensation for economic losses may be deducted from the employee's salary. However, the monthly deduction shall not exceed 20% of the employee's salary for that month. If the remaining part of the salary after deduction is lower than the local monthly minimum wage, it will be paid according to the minimum wage.
-
I am working as a driver in a company and my car breaks down, do I need to be liable for compensation?
Hello, I'm glad you asked, in a public joke as a driver, if the car breaks down, there is no need for the individual to bear the liability for compensation. Because you are the driver of the company, it means that the company is driving this car, and it is normal for the car to break down. Frequent wear and depreciation will lead to the breakdown of the car, and the cost of repair should be fully borne by the company.
Because you don't have a bus for private use. Driving the car of the public touching the state of Dongji, this is a bus. The above is about the compensation related to the car damage of the driver in the company, I hope it can help you.
Now there is car insurance, the compensation should be compensated by the insurance company, or you can ask for compensation with the company, but the amount of money is not necessarily, it depends on whether the company can agree to your request.
1 It depends on whether you are intentional or grossly negligent. >>>More
C5847F2668B1035FFCC7700C077A5E80E3C7A81For many car owners, fogging in the window has always been a headache for them, because if you wipe it with a rag, it will be time-consuming and laborious, and the point is that the effect is not good. Especially in the rainy season, dozens of days of rainy weather
Method 1: Spraying anti-fogging agents and other preventive methods. >>>More
Shareholders must have a position in the company, either as general manager, chairman, or deputy general manager and other positions, shareholders can participate in the company's decision-making, of course, there must be the company's articles of association or the decision of the shareholders' meeting, so the work for shareholders should be regarded as working for the company under the leadership of the general manager or chairman or deputy general manager. In the final analysis, it is still working for the company, the company is an independent legal person, an independent organization granted by law, the shareholders put their property into the company, the shareholders enjoy the equity, and the property belongs to the company, which is the truth. This is a theory, and it is viewed from the perspective of external responsibility. >>>More