Why are more and more people choosing to return farmland to forest?

Because now there are many people in my country who know more and more about protecting the environment, and they feel that it is not possible to do without forests, so they want to green the environment, and I think their approach is really very good, and it is worth learning from.

Because the environmental problems we are facing are still very serious, once the protection of forests is lost, many natural disasters will occur from time to time, bringing catastrophe to human beings.

I think that now that we have entered a civilized society, people have to maintain the environment in which we live while pursuing a high quality of life.

Legal Analysis: The land returned to forests is not one's own. According to the relevant laws and regulations, in addition to the land that belongs to the state as prescribed by law, the land in rural areas and suburbs of cities, including homesteads, self-reserved land and self-cultivated mountains, belongs to peasant collectives.

Land owned by the state or owned by peasant collectives for agricultural purposes in accordance with law may be contracted and operated by units or individuals. Those who return farmland to forests enjoy the ownership of trees (grasses) on the land returned to farmland.

Legal basis: Land Management Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 9 The land in urban areas of cities shall be owned by the State. Land in rural areas and on the outskirts of cities shall be owned by peasant collectives, except as provided by law for the State; Homesteads, self-cultivated land, and self-cultivated mountains belong to peasant collectives.

Article 10 State-owned land and land owned by peasant collectives may be determined for use by units or individuals in accordance with law. Units and individuals using land have the obligation to protect, manage, and rationally use land.

Article 13: Cultivated land, forest land, grassland, and other land used for agriculture in accordance with law owned by peasant collectives and owned by the State in accordance with law, shall be contracted by means of household contracting within rural collective economic organizations, and barren mountains, barren ditches, barren hills, barren beaches, etc., which are not suitable for household contracting, may be contracted by means of bidding, auction, public consultation, etc., to engage in planting, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery production. The contract period is 30 years for cultivated land contracted by households, 30 to 50 years for grassland, and 30 to 70 years for forest land. After the expiration of the contract period for cultivated land, it shall be extended for another 30 years, and after the expiration of the contract period for grassland and forest land, it shall be extended accordingly in accordance with law. Land owned by the State for agricultural purposes in accordance with the law may be contracted and operated by units or individuals engaged in crop farming, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery production.

The contract issuing party and the contracting party shall conclude a contract in accordance with law, stipulating the rights and obligations of both parties. Units and individuals contracted to operate land have the obligation to protect and rationally utilize the land in accordance with the purposes agreed in the contract.

Article 47 of the Regulations on Returning Farmland to Forests The State protects those who have returned farmland to forests and enjoy the ownership of trees (grasses) on the land returned to farmland. Where farmland is returned to forest on its own, the owner of the land contract management right shall enjoy the ownership of the forest (grass) on the land returned to farmland; Where others are entrusted to return forests or cooperate with others to return forests, the ownership of trees (grasses) on the land to be returned to farmland shall be stipulated in the contract. After the land returned to forest, the people at or above the county level shall issue forest (grass) ownership certificates in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Forest Law and the Grassland Law, confirm the ownership and use rights, and go through the land change registration procedures in accordance with the law.

Land contracting and operation contracts shall be adjusted accordingly.

Legal Analysis: Returning farmland to forest means proceeding from the protection and improvement of the ecological environment, stopping the cultivation of sloping cultivated land that is prone to soil erosion in a planned and step-by-step manner, planting trees and reforesting according to local conditions in accordance with the principle of suitable trees in suitable places, and restoring forest vegetation. The construction of the project of returning farmland to forests includes two aspects:

First, sloping farmland is returned to forest; The second is the afforestation of barren mountains and wastelands suitable for forests.

Legal basis: "Several Opinions on Further Improving Policies and Measures for Returning Farmland to Forests" Article 1 The principles that must be followed in returning farmland to forests:

1) Returning farmland to forests should adhere to the priority of ecological benefits, taking into account farmers' food, income increase and local economic development; Persist in attaching equal importance to ecological construction and ecological protection, and take comprehensive measures to stop the problem of destruction while tackling it; Adhere to the combination of policy guidance and farmers' voluntariness, and fully respect the wishes of farmers; insist on respecting the laws of nature and scientifically selecting tree species; Persist in adapting measures to local conditions, make overall plans, highlight key points, and pay attention to practical results.

2) In the implementation of returning farmland to forests, it is necessary to conscientiously implement the policies and measures of "returning farmland to forests, closing mountains for afforestation, substituting grain for relief, and individual contracting", adhere to the mechanism of individual contracting, and implement the combination of responsibilities and rights. It is necessary to conscientiously grasp the main links of "forest rights are the core, grain supply is the key, seedlings must be planted first, and cadres are the guarantee" to ensure the success of returning farmland to forests.

Returning farmland to forest is to proceed from the protection and improvement of the ecological environment, stop cultivating sloping cultivated land that is prone to soil erosion in a planned and step-by-step manner, and in line with the principle of combining trees and shrubs, and cultivate forests and grasses in accordance with local conditions, and restore forest and grass vegetation. Returning farmland to forest refers to sloping cultivated land and desertified cultivated land with serious soil erosion and low and unstable yield. The construction of the project of returning farmland to forests includes two aspects:

The first is to return sloping cultivated land to forest, and the second is to afforestate barren mountains and wastelands suitable for forest.

Returning farmland to forests is one of China's important policies for implementing the strategy of developing the western region, and its basic policy measures are "returning farmland to forests, closing mountains for afforestation, substituting grain for relief, and contracting by individuals."

In order to better ensure China's ecological security, repair and improve the ecologyResources, in China since 2002 the full implementation of the ecological project of returning farmland, the focus of returning farmland to the central and western regions, the implementation of the target for ecological environmental protection sensitive, river root slope agricultural land, desertification petrochemical agricultural land, according to incomplete statistical analysis, the accumulation has been completed to return 100 million acres of agricultural landAlthough the total number is relatively large, the proportion is limited compared with more than 2 billion mu of agricultural land in China. Although our country has a vast territory and a relatively large territorial area, it lacks forests and greenery, and <>

In order to ensure the safety of more than 1.3 billion mu of grain production, China has always adhered to the moral bottom line of the red line of 1.8 billion mu of cultivated land, which is the core point of China's grain production security. The heavily polluted areas that have been returned to farmland are in the central and western regions, in some green and ecologically sensitive areas, and in some rivers, lakes and seas, as well as in coastal areas. As for the overall situation of returning farmland to a very small number of certain areas, it does exist in some areas, and it is <> for the overall return of farmland to a very few green and ecologically sensitive areas

In China, the current policy of ecological resettlement will be formulated to demolish and relocate the farmers in the overall farmland return area, and install them in suitable areas, and the farmers who are demolished will be allocated land resources and other production factors, or assigned students to employment, and completely free to live in the demolition and resettlement houses built by the ** department, so as to ensure the peace and security of the relocated households. Generally, it is not easy for farmers with high yield per mu to choose to withdraw from agricultural land, unless it is the overall layout plan, but it is not easy to withdraw all agricultural land, only a small part, there is also a high yield of agricultural land per mu every year harvest converted into Chinese yuan, which is higher than the subsidy for returning farmland to forest, on the contrary, if the yield per mu of agricultural land is not too high, <>

It is very cost-effective to carry out the return of farmland, because the subsidy for returning farmland is higher than the harvest of each year; If allI guess that the village must be demolished as a whole, but I have never seen such a thing, because land is the basis for the survival of farmers, especially the older generation in the countryside has a special affection for the soil. As for how to solve the problem of rural people's living consumption and housing, if all the agricultural land is withdrawn, because there are subsidies for returning farmland to forests over the years, they can rest assured that they can carry out part-time work outside, and it is not easy to be distressed by the cultivated land of agricultural land, and if the housing depends on their overall strength, if they have the economic strength to be able to enter the city and live in peace, on the contrary, if all the agricultural land is not returned to farmland, then the surplus can be usedI went to the city to work or do odd jobs, and when it was the busy season, I went home to work.

Because the profit of growing crops in the field is very small, and it is not proportional to one's own efforts; In this way, we can protect our environment and can have a higher income.

Because they feel that farming is tiring without making money. This can make the ecological environment better.

This is a very good practice, and it can play a role in protecting the environment, and it can also benefit human development.

Because these people want to protect the environment, the current environment is too bad, if the environment is not protected, then the earth may not be good, and human beings may not be able to survive.

This is because the desertification of the land is too serious, the ecological imbalance, the lack of resources, and the excessive wind and sand cause people to choose to return farmland to forest.

Because great attention is paid to the protection of the environment, returning farmland to forest can restore our environment to a certain extent.