In China, 51.5 billion mu of farmland has been returned to forests, and will the reduction of cultiv

No. China can achieve self-sufficiency in food rations, and after returning farmland to forests, it can import some grain that is not eaten by the people, and China has established a grain reserve bank, so that there will be no food crisis.

I think that the loss of arable land threatens food security, and the reduction of arable land means that we are also facing less food, and we humans depend on food to survive.

No, because China has a food security red line, which is 1.8 billion mu, and 1.8 billion mu of grain arable land must be guaranteed, so that food security will not be threatened.

It cannot be supplemented 1. The land that has been returned to the forest in the Xushan Mountains belongs to forest land. 2. Returning farmland to forest is to proceed from the protection and improvement of the ecological environment, stop cultivation of sloping cultivated land that is prone to soil erosion in a planned and step-by-step manner, and plant trees and afforestation according to local conditions to restore forest vegetation in accordance with the principle of suitable trees in suitable places. The construction of the project of returning farmland to forests includes two aspects:

First, sloping farmland is returned to forest; The second is the afforestation of barren mountains and wastelands suitable for forests. 3. Returning farmland to forest refers to stopping cultivation of sloping cultivated land that is prone to soil erosion and cultivated land that is prone to desertification in a planned and step-by-step manner from the perspective of protecting and improving the ecological environment in the western region; In line with the principle of combining trees and shrubs, trees and shrubs, afforestation and grass planting should be carried out according to local conditions, and forest and grass vegetation should be restored. The State implements a system of funds and grain subsidies for returning farmland to forests, and the State shall, for a certain period of time, provide appropriate subsidies for grain, seedlings and afforestation, and cash (living expenses) to those who have returned farmland to forests without compensation in accordance with the approved area of farmland returned to forests.

In the Yellow River Basin and the northern region, 100 kilograms of raw grain and 20 yuan in cash will be subsidized per mu of returned farmland every year, and at least 8 years will be subsidized for ecological forests, 5 years will be subsidized for economic forests, and 2 years will be subsidized for grassland. 50 yuan per mu of cultivated land and barren mountains and wasteland suitable for forests will be subsidized for seedling afforestation. 4. To sum up, the land returned to forest belongs to forest land.

On the surface, China has more than enough grain to eat. And people are living well. Please think about it, it is a bit like a big flood that washed the Dragon King Temple, quite a horizontal impact on the grain market of rural farmers, the grain planted by farmers has achieved a big harvest, but the root price has become smaller, and the pressure can not be sold at home, sometimes it is sold, and the price seems difficult to understand.

First, with the development of agricultural science and technology, the excellent types of crops have been greatly improved, crop cultivation technology has been greatly improved, the yield has been improved by leaps and bounds, the crop yield has increased from more than 100 kilograms per mu in the past, to about 1000 kilograms per mu today, the yield has increased nearly ten times, and the high yield of crops is a major reason. We should mobilize the enthusiasm of grain farmers to the greatest extent and increase their farming income and political position at the policy level.

Second, people's life has been greatly improved in food, in the past, people's lives were mainly grain-based, meat, eggs and milk in people's lives are very little, now the market has a sufficient supply of meat, eggs and milk, there is a part of people who have rarely eaten grains, people eat a lot of food is the second main reason. It is necessary to strengthen the establishment of rural areas, especially the establishment of education and medical and public health in rural areas, to ensure that the children of peasants have education in the villages, and that peasants can receive basic treatment at the first time when they fall ill, so as to preserve the roots of peasants.

Third, China's accession to the WTO has given China a huge quota for importing grain and agricultural products, and a large number of these foreign agricultural products have filled our country's market, and they have greatly replaced our own agricultural products, and the import of large quantities of foreign agricultural products is the third major reason. Today's crop seeds must be bought and sold every year, and the crops harvested in one year will either not germinate or will not be harvested at all the next year. In order to reduce the burden on farmers and ensure the best problem of crop seeds in a specific period, the national seed research institute should ensure that farmers can use seeds in the next year in the types of agricultural products harvested, which is a strategic situation.

Agriculture is the foundation of a country, agriculture prospers, the country prospers, agriculture declines, and the country declines. A strong nation needs to be supported by a strong agriculture. Agriculture, countryside, farmers are the cornerstone of a country's prosperity, the three rural areas are rich, the country will be rich, the three rural areas will be strong, the country will be strong.

This may be a lot of imports, so there is no shortage of food, so everyone can eat.

Because the terrain for growing grain is relatively high-quality, the soil is fertile, and some land that has been returned to forest or has been abandoned does not meet such conditions, and the crops will not grow better, so it does not affect grain production.

Because of the progress of science and technology, our grain output is getting higher and higher, and the land that has been returned to forest is also some barren land.

Rural land has either been abandoned, or farmland has been returned to forests and planted with trees, so why is there no shortage of food?

First: Rural land is either abandoned or returned to forests. If it is not an exaggeration, this is in some places, such as in the mountains.

There is a provision for returning farmland to forests, which is not inappropriate or abnormal. From a national point of view, farmland protection is very important. There are strict regulations on the requisition of cultivated land, and it is not allowed to contract abandoned cultivated land.

Second: There are many reasons for food shortages, and in the final analysis, they are the result of the development of productive forces.

From a global perspective, some agricultural developed countries export surplus grain, and China's economic growth has the ability to import part of the grain to maintain grain stability and drive import and export, which is beneficial to the country and the people, and also mutually beneficial and win-win with the country. Of course, this is only an addition, not even a secondary one.

Third: In China, on the one hand, mechanization and electrification are popularized, pesticides and fertilizers are sufficient, seeds are constantly improved, large-scale contracting, consortia and other business methods are diversified, the level of scientific farming is improved, and grain output is steadily increasing year by year. On the other hand, with the improvement of people's living standards and the importance of food nutrition, the food they eat is also diversified, and the market is sufficient.

As a result, there is less demand for foods that are used directly for "eating". When working in the production team, many young workers eat 1 to 5 catties at a meal. Today, eating half a catty of rice is not small.

This increase and decrease will consume less food.

According to the Ministry of Agriculture's 2018 grain sown area, total production and unit area, China's overall cultivated land area has not decreased as we expected, that is, the area of cultivated land has not fluctuated very much. Although the red line for cultivated land is not up to standard, it will not make much difference.

In short, China's ability to ensure food self-sufficiency is not empty talk. From the overall data analysis, at present, China's main food problems are not big, but corn, soybeans and other agricultural and sideline products are overly dependent on imports, and there are still hidden dangers. We still need to take care of food.

The yield of the black soil in Northeast China is very high, and it is dependent on imports, so even if the farmland is returned to forest and planted trees, there will be no shortage of food.

This phenomenon is rare in rural areas. There is very little land abandoned in rural areas, and most of it is for growing food crops, especially in places like Heilongjiang, where the land is fertile, and there is no abandonment. So there are a lot of rumors on the Internet, all rumors, not true.

There is a problem with this statement, because China has always been relatively short of grain, but some grain needs to be imported.

Summary. Hello! Cultivated land that has been abandoned for many years is usually due to a decline in soil quality and reduced soil fertility, which also leads to an environmental and ecological imbalance in the region. In this case, returning farmland to forest is a better management method.

Hello! Cultivated land that has been abandoned for many years is usually due to a decline in soil quality and reduced soil fertility, which also leads to an environmental and ecological imbalance in the region. In this case, returning farmland to forest is a better way to deal with noisy stoves.

Fellow, I really didn't understand, I can be more specific.

Hello! Returning farmland to forest can improve the soil environment, promote plant growth, improve land fertility, and help restore ecological leveling and balance. In the process of returning farmland to forest, tree species suitable for local environmental conditions and climatic characteristics can be selected for planting scattered eggplant.

For example, for saline or sandy soils, you can choose to plant poplars, pines, and other trees; For areas with humid climates, you can choose to plant teak, willow and other tree species that adapt to local environmental conditions.

Will the increase in compensation for returning farmland to forests have an impact on agriculture?

First, returning farmland to forest refers to the return of partially degraded, desertified, and petrochemical cultivated land, sloping cultivated land in ecologically fragile areas, and cultivated land on steep slopes at the headwaters of rivers and lakes and along the coast to forests and grasslands in order to protect and improve the ecology. It is not possible to return farmland to forests indefinitely.

In addition, the Ministry of Land and Resources needs to obtain approval for returning farmland to forests. Only those who meet the requirements can be included in the list of returning farmland to forests. Therefore, even if the subsidy for returning farmland to forest is increased, or if the standard is high, it will not cause a significant reduction in cultivated land and affect agricultural production.

Second, the compensation for returning farmland to forest increased slightly, but it decreased significantly compared with the first round of returning farmland to forest. Returning farmland to forest will not affect a significant reduction of arable land. On the contrary, returning farmland to forest can improve the ecology, regulate the climate, and promote the development of agricultural production.

Third: In order to achieve green and sustainable development of agriculture, it is very necessary to return farmland to forest and grassland! This not only reflects the foresight of the policy, but also ensures that farmers can benefit from agriculture in the long run! I hope that under the guidance of the policy, the life of our peasant brothers will get better and better!

Fourth, since there is relatively little arable land available to farmers after returning farmland to forest, the income of some farming-based households will naturally decrease. Therefore, in order to compensate for this loss, these farmers will receive subsidies for returning farmland to forests.

Returning farmland to forest is a special policy formulated for the main purpose of protecting the environment, and it is a subsidy to the farmers concerned. Subsidies for returning farmland to forests include incentives for farmers to return farmland to forests where crop yields are low or where land is barren, because effective improvements have not been achieved over time.

Fifth, returning farmland to forest and grassland has ecological functions such as water conservation, atmospheric environment purification, carbon sequestration and oxygen release, biodiversity conservation, soil conservation, forest protection and forest nutrient conservation. It is conducive to controlling soil erosion and sandstorms, and creating good ecological conditions for economic and social development; In the long run, it is also to reconcile the relationship between man and nature and realize the sustainable development of the Chinese nation.

It should be pointed out that although Chinese have a large population, little land and valuable arable land resources, the reclamation of land with weak ecological carrying capacity and unsuitable for reclamation often has low economic benefits and great environmental damage, and even forms a vicious circle of "the poorer the reclamation, the worse the reclamation".

It will not only have a relatively large impact on agriculture, but also lead to fewer and fewer people farming, which will lead to less and less attention to agriculture.

This has implications for agriculture, which discourages farmers and reduces arable land.

It should have no impact, after all, there is a clear division between farmland and forest land, and naturally it will not interfere.

The status and impact of the shrinkage of land resources in China.

Abstract】:Land is the environmental space on which human beings depend, the most important natural resources and means of production in human social production, and the object of labor. However, the current situation of China's land resources is worrying, with a sharp decrease in cultivated land, soil erosion, and serious land desertification.

This paper briefly analyzes the current situation and impact of the reduction of land resources in China, and puts forward some suggestions for the sustainable use of land resources.

Keywords]: the current situation of land resource reduction in China; land shrinkage impacts; Sustainable use of land.

China has a land area of 9.6 million square kilometers, accounting for 25% of the world's land area and Asia's land area, second only to Russia and Canada, ranking third in the world. Although China has abundant land resources, it is poor per capita. According to the data released by the Ministry of Land and Resources, the total amount of cultivated land, lead excavation wide forest land and pasture land in China in 2004 was as high as 10,000 hectares, 10,000 hectares and 10,000 hectares respectively, ranking fourth, fifth and second in the world respectively, but the per capita is about % and 35% of the current world average respectively.

Taking arable land as an example, China has always fed 22% of the world's population with less than 10% of the world's arable land.

1. The situation and impact of the shrinkage of land resources in China.

1.The area of arable land has decreased dramatically.

China is a large country with a large population, and the per capita land is quite limited. Due to the shortage of land resources, the contradictions between economic construction and agricultural production, as well as between agriculture, forestry, and animal husbandry, are quite conspicuous.

According to the results of the 2004 national land use change survey, the per capita cultivated land area in China has decreased from hm2 in the previous year to hm2. The national construction accounts for 10,000 hm2 of cultivated land, 10,000 hm2 of cultivated land destroyed by disasters, 10,000 hm2 of cultivated land is reduced by agricultural restructuring, and 10,000 hm2 of cultivated land is reduced by 10,000 hm2 of ecological return. The sharp decline in cultivated land and the rapid increase in population have led to a continuous decline in the per capita occupation of cultivated land, and as of 2005, the cultivated land area of the country was 100 million mu.

The per capita cultivated land area has decreased from 10 years ago to 2004. In 2006, the area of cultivated land in the country was 100 million mu, a net decrease of 10,000 mu over the previous year. In 2007, the national cultivated land area was 100 million mu, and the per capita cultivated land was only mu, which was less than 40% of the world's per capita level; And Australia nearly 40 acres, Canada acres, Russian acres, the United States acres of Huailiang, India acres.

It can be seen that these large countries with a land area or the number of scattered populations are equivalent to or close to China's, and the relationship between people and land is much more relaxed than China's.

At the same time, the excessive occupation of cultivated land has also led to a sharp decrease in the area of cultivated land. Some enterprises and institutions are affected by the gratuitous use of land, occupy too much land, expropriate early and use it late, or even expropriate it but do not use it, resulting in a waste of land. There are also many irrational phenomena in urban land use, such as insufficient land development and utilization in the central business districts of large and medium-sized cities, and few building levels.

The area of cultivated land has decreased sharply, the contradiction between land supply and demand is acute, and the per capita cultivated land area has been declining.