Do you support guiding rational rewarding and researching and formulating anchor classification and

I don't support it, and this kind of classification management can't be managed right away. It will also cause a lot of inconvenience, and that's it.

In the tank. This allows some minors to better broadcast live and prevent bad live broadcasts from having a bad impact.

I support, after all, there are many fans who are beyond their ability to tip, which will bring a great burden, so rational tipping should be promoted.

First of all, we can divide the number with relatively large traffic and the number with relatively small traffic, so that we can directly find the big V or small V number. Secondly, classify the live content of these accounts, different live broadcast content is divided into different categories, and some can also be divided according to the time of the live broadcast.

Standardize the management of live broadcast classification, set different reward amounts for different types of live broadcasts, such as games, beauty, and goods, and limit the total amount of rewards received.

It will establish a categorical management system and various rules, make the live broadcast rules transparent, and manage different types of live broadcast content by region, so as to make the network environment brighter.

Personally, I think it's necessary, if you don't manage it so clearly, it will become very confusing.

It is necessary not only to help manage the network environment, but also to make it easier for us to find it, killing two birds with one stone.

It's necessary. Nowadays, online live broadcast has become a very popular media method, but the management of online live broadcast has always been very lacking, including quota management and classification management. Through the development of online live broadcasts, different categories have been extended, including live broadcasts with beauty games, etc., and different live broadcasts should have different management methods.

I think it's still necessary to have a grading so that you don't have to be afraid, children see something they shouldn't see, and adults will have their own freedom to see what they want.

I still think it is necessary to classify differently, which is conducive to management, and it is easier to check the different content of different categories of live broadcasts, which will reduce a lot of workload, and there will not often be some problems that cannot be solved due to complexity.

I think it is very necessary, now that the network is developed, there are many non-standardized, so hierarchical management is conducive to purifying the network environment.

It is necessary. If there is no such hierarchical management, the live broadcast industry will definitely develop more and more chaotic.

Then there should be an overall plan and a complete system for the management of live broadcasting. For the currently formulated anchor classification and classification management, IHere are a few suggestions

The classification and classification are clear, and under the current social market, live broadcast is divided into different types, including e-commerce live broadcast, entertainment live broadcast, chat live broadcast and other different types of live broadcast from all walks of life, each type is concentrated in one platform, which is mixed, and it is not convenient for the management and supervision of the industrial and commercial departments. If the classification and classification can be clear, the efficiency of live broadcast management can be greatly improved.

There is a certain mechanism for live streaming to genre. For example, if an entertainment anchor wants to change careers to a live broadcast industry, the anchor needs to have a certain written test or corresponding specifications for assessment, and if the assessment is successful, he can transform or be promoted. In this way, network management can be standardized, the network can be purified, and anchors from all walks of life can have certain industry norms.

There is also a certain reward and punishment system, for the anchor who does well, you can issue a certain reward or platform issuance or ** reward and encouragement mechanism, of course, for the anchor who does not do well or the anchor who has received more complaints, the anchor with vulgar content should also be punished accordingly, and the punishment is different according to its different violations.

All in all, whether it is the live broadcast platform or the state to introduce various policies, it is also to protect the rights of consumers, and it is also to regulate the rules of market operation. My recommendations are based on this basis.

I suggest that the classification can be concretized, such as games, emotions, talents, e-commerce, etc., and set up a relatively clear reward and punishment system, which is conducive to the development of green and healthy live broadcasting. In addition, I think that the 8 departments are very good, with the advent of the Internet era, the anchor industry in recent years has also been particularly hot, it is time to standardize the live broadcast industry, and it is also conducive to the long-term healthy development of the industry in the future.

To improve the entry threshold of anchors, not everyone can be an anchor. The anchor application system is adopted, and certain conditions are required to be an anchor, and it can only be approved by **. A scoring system will be applied to the anchor, and if the score is lower than a certain value, the account will be directly banned.

The first suggestion is to raise the threshold for anchors, the second suggestion is to conduct inspections when anchors are live broadcasters, and close the account immediately if illegal content is found, and the third suggestion is to conduct real-name authentication for anchors and strengthen training for anchors.

The first suggestion is to make the streamer follow the rules of online trading, and classify them well, and also score them according to their strength and credibility.

The second suggestion is that the relevant supervisory authorities conduct an investigation, such as the practicability and authenticity of the goods of the anchor.

I think it is necessary to divide the anchors into categories such as anchors with goods, beauty anchors, game anchors, etc., and then classify them according to the number of fans.

Yes. Set basic scores for accounts, formulate live broadcast rules, and accept supervision from netizens and **. You can use the scoring and bonus points system to add or subtract points according to the live broadcast content, downgrade, and when the score is too low, the account will be banned.

My suggestion is that if there is a problem, you can give a demotion punishment, or restrict the receipt of gifts, establish a clear system of rewards and punishments, and protect the healthy online environment of minors.

I suggest that anchor accounts be strictly classified and strictly eliminated, and that anchors who spread wrong values and have a bad impact be directly banned, especially in combination with audience classification, especially anchors for minors, because online live broadcasts are too chaotic now, and many bad anchors are easy to bring bad minors, and they urgently need to be rectified.

There are no big opinions or suggestions for the time being, and now the main suggestion is to add age level restrictions to the hierarchical management, so that some younger children who can't distinguish right from wrong can watch less of the speeches of some bad anchors, which will better promote our future development.

My suggestion is.

1.Under the condition of grading and classification, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision of the speech and behavior of anchors, so as to reduce the behavior of some anchors who play sidelines or maliciously guide them.

2.Regularly spot check the quality of goods and after-sales service of bloggers. Many fans find that the product has quality problems after buying things in the live broadcast room, but no one cares about it, so that the rights and interests of fans can be protected as much as possible.

Classification is one thing, and the most important thing is to do the following: 1. The main responsibility should be clarified, and the platform cannot be left alone; 2. Regulatory measures, establish and improve the management mechanism; 3. It is necessary to improve the qualification review of practitioners. The anchor industry has a low threshold and a large volume, and if the management can't keep up, it will become a place to hide dirt and dirt.

For the hierarchical and categorical management of accounts, my suggestion is to formulate relevant punishment rules and strictly implement them. Only when the punishment rules come out to regulate the anchors, the anchors will strictly abide by the rules.

According to the anchor's live broadcast content, the most important thing is to control the platform, and strict management of the platform is the way to cure the root cause.

Suggestion 1: Increase the assessment of anchors to make the entire industry full of positive energy.

Suggestion 2: Formulate rewards and punishments for anchors, formulate and divide punishment rules for the platform, and also prepare reward mechanisms. This can promote the motivation of the streamer.

The purpose of this setting is to prevent minors from overspending under the supervision of their parents, and also to facilitate the handling of accidents in the event of an accident.

The purpose of this setting is to regulate the live broadcast industry and protect the rights and interests of live broadcast audiences. This is a good provision.

A rectification of the live broadcast industry is carried out, because there is now some bubble in the Zhibo industry, and the introduction of this kind of regulation is to make the live broadcast develop better.

With the development of the Internet, the network has also appeared around us, and mobile phones have also been popularized to everyone's side, which also provides us with a series of conveniences, but there is also a certain convenience for such a situation, because now with the development of life, it is also a fast-paced appearance, and in this case, it will also bring invisible pressure to many people. But in many cases, there are a series of problems that we don't want to see. <>

Some minors steal their parents' money to carry out a series of blind rewards, in this case, in fact, many times will bring a certain amount of trouble to the family, after all, it is also an unreasonable behavior for their own situation, which seriously violates their parents' right to know, many people sometimes in the news we can also see similar problems like this from time to time, but still have not been a good solution, in this sentiment should also attract our attention, Because for teenagers, they are very impulsive, and they are also in a busy state for their own thoughts, and when such things happen, they need to be reasonably educated. "At the end of the year, a policy on the classification of live broadcasters and the management of rewards will be introduced" has also triggered a strong demand from netizens, after all, under such a policy, the legitimate rights and interests of consumers can also be better protected. <>

Don't let some bad habits into our lives, you can also avoid teenagers blindly rewarding, in this case it is more responsible for yourself, because in many cases for such a reward is out of their own impulse, regret it will not help later, because there is no regret medicine in the world, don't let the future pay for it because of your own impulse. <>