-
The practice of ignoring the people and imprisoning people's minds in order to strengthen the rule and consolidate the situation of great unification will only make the rule more corrupt, and the country and the nation will be suppressed and imprisoned, unable to develop better and faster, and will eventually fall behind and be beaten.
-
The Imperial Power Continued to Strengthen Confucianism provided the ruling ideology for the strengthening of the imperial power Confucianism became the mainstream of thought.
-
In fact, according to the records of the "Historical Records", Qin Shi Huang did not pit Confucianism, but killed a large number of warlocks who made alchemy for him, and burning books to pit Confucianism is a misunderstanding of history.
-
It is necessary to attach importance to the cultivation of qualified personnel.
-
"Book burning pit Confucianism" is Qin Shi Huang.
The most criticized point is that after so many years of propaganda and guidance, the idiom of burning books and pit Confucianism has become Qin Shi Huang's burning of classics and killing scholars, which is also a major evidence of Qin Shi Huang's crime of becoming a tyrant. "Deposing the Hundred Schools" is Emperor Wu of the Western Han Dynasty.
A policy implemented at the suggestion of Dong Zhongshu was to "promote the Confucian clan and suppress the hundred schools", that is, to promote Confucianism politically and suppress Taoism.
Legalism, Yin-Yang School, Miscellaneous School and other schools, officials are only selected from Confucianism, and after a long time, Confucianism will naturally become orthodox.
So, what's the difference between these two policies?
First of all, the means are not the same. Whether it was a Confucian or a warlock who was killed by Qin Shi Huang, or whether it was a classic book or a miscellaneous book that was burned, his methods were relatively drastic, and it was accompanied by bloodshed and violence. And "deposing the hundred schools" seems to be a little mild, and it is a conspiracy.
The official court does not use officials who are not born in Confucianism, it is always the power of others! But in this way, young people will naturally not learn other theories, after all, in ancient times, it was important to pay attention to "learning and excellence", there are not many ways out for scholars, and being an official is the most common.
Therefore, the difference between the two is that Qin Shi Huang was more violent and direct, killing people and setting fires, while Emperor Wu of Han adopted another method.
Second, the historical background of the policy is different. The period when Qin Shi Huang burned books and pit Confucianism was the Qin State.
The Six Nations had just been unified, but the land of the Six Nations had not yet been completely digested, the rule over the newly occupied areas was not strong enough, the regime was not stable, and various acts of resistance and resistance still existed. At this time, of course, Qin Shi Huang could not allow all kinds of doctrines that were not conducive to ruling to continue to spread in the market. By the time of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, the country's strength had reached its peak and it needed to expand externally, and the doctrines of Taoism and Legalism were not beneficial to the rule at that time.
On the one hand, he wanted to straighten out domestic relations, so that all strata could unify the consensus and form a joint force, and on the other hand, he wanted to expand externally, which was different from the period of Qin Shi Huang.
Moreover, the impact on future generations is different. At least in the period of Qin Shi Huang, Confucianism was not very popular, but the doctrines of yin and yang, legalism, Taoism, and miscellaneous schools had to prevail, and if the books were really burned, how did the later classics come out? Those classics written before Qin Shi Huang still survive, indicating that Qin Shi Huang's so-called book burning pit Confucianism was not thorough, and the impact on later generations was not so deep.
And Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty deposed Confucianism.
It is different, from the Western Han Dynasty to the Qing Dynasty for more than 1,000 years, Confucianism has made great progress, and it has not changed, and the entire social system has been deeply influenced by him.
-
The "Book Burning and Pit Confucianism" during the reign of Qin Shi Huang and the "Deposition of the Hundred Schools of Thought" during the reign of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty are both well-known cultural events, but there are some differences between the two in terms of nature, purpose, and consequences.
First, book burning was a cultural policy implemented by Qin Shi Huang to consolidate his rule by eliminating documents and scholars that did not conform to the ideology of the Qin dynasty. This policy led to the loss of a large number of classical documents and the silence of Confucianism, which brought immeasurable losses to the inheritance and development of Chinese culture.
The deposition of the Hundred Schools of Thought during the period of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was a means taken to promote Confucianism, and its purpose was to rectify the evils of the times and strengthen the rule. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty abolished the policy of contending with a hundred schools of thought, promoted cultural unification with Confucianism as the mainstream thought, strengthened Confucian education, and made Confucianism the official doctrine of the Han Dynasty.
Second, the book-burning pit Confucianism was aimed at all schools of thought, mainly focusing on literature and Confucian scholars. The deposition of the Hundred Schools of Thought was mainly aimed at rejecting non-Confucian ideas, and only restricting the spread of non-Confucian ideas, rather than carrying out large-scale purges like book burning and pit Confucianism.
Finally, the consequence of the burning of books was the destruction of culture, the exodus or disappearance of intellectuals in large numbers, and the great hindrance of cultural inheritance. The deposition of the Hundred Schools did not directly harm academics, but encouraged the rise and development of Confucianism.
Thus, while the burning of books and the deposition of Confucianism and the deposition of the Hundred Schools of Thought both had a profound impact on Chinese culture, there are clear differences in their nature, purpose, and consequences.
-
Qin Shi Huang suppressed Confucianism, in addition to burning books and killing Confucian students, causing dissatisfaction among the literati and laying the foundation for the fall of the Qin Dynasty.
-
It happened in different times, in different meanings, in different natures, in different influences, and in different people.
-
Usually book burning is a bit more serious because they don't allow any knowledge to spread. But during the reign of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, knowledge was still supported. It's just that assignments are not allowed.
-
The burning of books harmed human lives and centralized power, but the deposition of the hundred schools of thought removed the bad culture, and at the same time developed other cultures, and did not harm people.
-
The different attitudes of Qin Shi Huang and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty towards Confucianism were that Qin Shi Huang burned books to suppress Confucian culture, and Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty deposed Confucianism and vigorously promoted Confucian culture. Qin Shi Huang believed that Confucianism slandered the government and despised the authority of the emperor, which was not conducive to the situation of unification after the unification of the Six Kingdoms, so he burned books to pit Confucianism; Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty saw that Confucianism could consolidate feudal rule and was more aggressive than Huang Lao's thought, so he followed Dong Zhongshu's advice to "depose the hundred schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone."
ConfucianismConfucianism is one of the hundred schools of thought of the pre-Qin princes, Confucianism has the characteristics of openness and inclusiveness, Confucianism has the characteristics of being applied to the world, Zhou Gong and the three generations of ritual music, is the forerunner of Confucianism, the place where Zhou rites were formulated Luoyi into Zhou, is the ancestral court of Chinese Confucianism.
For thousands of years, it has been revered by generations of Confucian scholars. Confucianism, also known as Confucianism or Confucianism, was founded by Confucius, and later gradually formed a complete Confucian ideological system based on it, which had a far-reaching influence. Confucianism has been revered by Confucian scholars throughout the ages and has had a profound impact on China.
-
The first is that the background is different;
Qin Shi Huang had just unified the six kingdoms at that time, in order to unify the country. It is necessary to unify in all aspects.
Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was already under the conditions of great unification, in order to unify and rule in culture and system.
The second is that the content is different.
Qin Shi Huang's book-burning pit Confucianism was not only a simple cultural unity, but also abolished and destroyed everything that the Qin Dynasty deemed inappropriate in many aspects of life, law, social culture, customs, and etiquette.
This policy of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty focused on the unification of culture, system, and ideology, and although he deposed the speech and thought of a hundred schools, there was still some inheritance in the aspect of exclusive respect for Confucianism.
To be precise, it is the burning of poetry books, the pit warlock, and the real pit is Ming Chengzu Zhu Di.
The book "Analects" was originally burned by Qin Shi Huang. But later, some people claimed that there was still a copy in the cracks of the wall (at that time, it was still bamboo, and it seemed inappropriate to call it a book, so it was called so for the time being). The Analects we see now are all copies of the one in the gap, and the archaeological community has not found any Analects earlier than the time of Qin Shi Huang, so it cannot be confirmed.
slandering the government with the past and not the present, and slandering the government with private learning.
The similarity: both are attempts to use culture to suppress people's minds, strengthen their control over people, and consolidate their own rule. But the difference is that the former takes Confucianism as orthodoxy and uses Confucianism to strengthen its rule; The latter, on the contrary, deposed Confucianism and promoted Legalism. >>>More
Qin Shi Huang abolished the division of feuds, the county and county, the book with the text, the car with the track, the unified weights and measures, the construction of water conservancy, for the benefit of the people, the Great Wall, the protection of China, the south of the hundred Yue, the north of the Xiongnu, annexation of the eight wilderness, the shock of the four seas, the immortal achievements of the world, the foundation of the world's great powers, the opening of the world, the emperor of the ages. >>>More