Do we have property rights? Is this a big property right?

1.Is there any evidence that your husband's parents spent the woman's money when they built the house?

If you have enough evidence, then the ownership of the house cannot be measured by the name on the title deed alone. In other words, the owner of this house is not only your husband's parents, but also his grandparents.

2.At that time, your husband's aunt also funded 10,000 yuan, is there any evidence that this 10,000 yuan is a gift or a loan?

The purpose of this question is that if it is a gift, then the money will be given to your husband's parents and will be their joint property. If it is a loan, then the money can be recovered with evidence.

3.Whoever names it is on the title deed of the house are the joint property of your husband's parents.

After his mother's death, half of the property always went to his mother's estate. This inheritance is divided equally among the heirs in the first order (spouse, children, parents) in accordance with the law. In other words, if his grandparents were still alive at the time of his mother's death, then his mother's estate should be divided equally among your husband, your father-in-law, your husband's grandfather and grandmother.

Now the focus of the dispute is how much of the total market value of this house belongs to the joint property of their husband and wife, which involves the first two questions, do you have evidence? There is evidence to fight for a little more.

4.As for your stepmother to kick you out, I don't think she has the right to make such a request, and it is your father-in-law who wants to make it, because everything is the property that your father-in-law acquired before he married her, and even if the expenses are your father-in-law's business alone, and she has nothing to do with her.

5.Will his stepmother be able to stay in this house?

Of course, because your father-in-law has a share of the property rights of this house, then as long as your father-in-law allows it, the stepmother can of course move in. As for her children, the reasons are the same as above.

6.The debts owed by your mother-in-law during her lifetime belong to the joint debts of husband and wife, and when a house dies, the other party has the obligation to continue to repay the debts, otherwise you only inherit the property, not the debts, are you eating dry rice when the law is a law?

7.Your father-in-law is pursuing the tuition fees he paid for your husband.

I can't say this well, under normal circumstances, the expenses of children after the age of 18 are not in the scope of parental support, but most parents will voluntarily give these money to their children and will not ask for it. But if his father wants to pay it back, you really have to consult a professional. Personally, I think that he must have evidence to prove that the money is a loan rather than a gift in order to be repaid, otherwise, just like your aunt's 10,000 cash, how can it be said to be a loan without an IOU?

If it's a gift, what do you have to pay back?

The two old men should have stopped them before they got the certificate, and now if your father-in-law is not loose, you can only take the judicial route, your father-in-law has a property certificate is reasonable, and you can only strive for the maximum benefit, because there are many involved, you have to find a lawyer, and you can also sue them for the purpose of obtaining the certificate The woman wants to transfer the property.

The property right of the house is 70 years, and after 70 years, the house is still owned, and the land belongs to the state.

Three solutions to the expiration of the 70-year property right of the house:

1. Re-sign the contract and renew the transfer fee.

After the expiration of the land use period, if the state needs to take back the land, the property owner may go through the formalities for the transfer of land use rights again, sign the land transfer contract, and pay the land transfer fee to the state. At that time, how to seek the greatest balance between the interests of the state, the community owners and the individual owners has become the key to whether this practice can be implemented. The specific amount of this land use fee needs to be clearly stipulated in the law once the owner of the house is unwilling to pay it, and whether the law allows the forced demolition of the owner's house.

2. The State shall recover the land and buildings on the ground and compensate the owners.

This is the simplest way to do this, in which the state directly repossesses the land and the buildings on the land, and pays the owner of the house a one-time financial compensation, which the owner can use to buy a new house to live in elsewhere. Of course, this one-time compensation must meet the standard of the homeowner to purchase a new house, and it is best to compensate according to the current location, area, and type of house at the corresponding market price.

3. The State shall recover the land and settle the matter by means similar to that of demolition and resettlement.

Since the ownership of land in China is the ownership of land except for collective ownership, the so-called 70-year land use period is granted by the state as the owner of the land, while the right to use houses is indefinite. As long as the buyer has a legal title deed, the house is private property and does not belong to the state. The individual has ownership of the house as long as it remains.

The specific solution can be that the state will take back the land use rights, the house will go with the land, and the individual's house will also be repossessed, and the state will build another resettlement house in other places, and give the owner a certain amount of compensation.

First, it is easy to judge whether it is a large property right house

1. What we call commercial housing (large property right housing) is"Five certificates"If you have all the money, you can get a mortgage, while a house with small property rights will not be filed and traded in the trading market, and it cannot be purchased with a mortgage loan.

2. The nature of the commercial housing land with large property rights is state-owned (the "State-owned Land Use Certificate" can be handled), and the small property rights are mostly collective land (the "State-owned Land Use Certificate" cannot be handled).

3. Large property rights can be handled for pre-sale certificates, while small property rights are expressly forbidden to be bought and sold, not to mention that there is no pre-sale certificate.

4. Large property rights can be signed online and filed with the Housing Authority, while small property rights cannot be filed with the Housing Authority.

5. Large property rights can support bank mortgage loans, and small property rights houses cannot be bank mortgages.

2. The so-called "small property rights" refer to the houses built on the collective land of farmers, and the land transfer fees and other fees have not been paid, and the property rights certificate is not issued by the state housing management department, but by the township ** or village **, so it is called "township property rights", also called "small property rights".

3. The so-called small property rights issued by the township ** actually have no real property rights. This kind of house does not have a land use certificate and pre-sale permit issued by the state, and the land and housing management bureau will not file the purchase contract. The so-called property right certificate is not a real legal and valid property right certificate.

Hope it helps, and I hope to click to adopt!