After work, out of the workshop, without the factory gate to eat apples, does the factory have the r

This is a production activity in the factory, and if the company's rules and regulations expressly prohibit it, then he has the right to fine. And this situation should be learned at the time of entry, the company cannot use fines to increase income, but widely publicize so that people do not violate, so as to achieve the company's management goals.

After work, out of the workshop, without the factory gate to eat apples, the factory has the right to fine. As long as the factory enters the factory gate, it is considered to be in the factory. It's all considered a violation of rules and disciplines, and it's no problem to fine in the factory!

If you are off work, you are out of the workshop, you are not out of the door to eat apples, if it is your own apples, the factory has been off work, I think you should not pay money, if you are working at the food station, you are not going to eat apples after work, you should be fined, definitely not your own apples, you should be fined.

This depends on how your company stipulates, if it belongs to the time of off-duty, I don't think the company has the right to fine. If you're in the factory and it's still working time, I think you'll be fined. The system of each company is different, depending on the specific situation of the company.

After work, just out of the workshop, no factory door, still in the factory, if the company stipulates that the factory is not allowed to eat, then the factory still has the right to fine!

I think I have the right to fine, as long as I don't go out of the door of the unit, I have the right to fine, it depends on the specific rules and regulations of the unit, how it is determined

This depends on the system of your factory, and if you have already left work, it should be free time, and you have no right to interfere, just eat an apple, and it should be fine.

According to what you said, you were fined for eating in the factory. This depends on your factory's own regulations, if the workshop is not allowed to eat, then the fine is unreasonable. If it is stipulated that no food can be eaten in the factory, that fine is reasonable.

If there is a rule in the factory that you can't eat, you can be punished, if not, you can't.

This mainly depends on how the company's rules and regulations are stipulated, and the specific rewards and punishments are still subject to the company's rules and regulations.

As long as there is no factory gate, the factory has the right to fine, just like as long as there is no factory door accident is a work-related injury.

Yes, you are in the factory.

You're outside the factory, eating apples during working hours, and no one cares about you.

If there are rules and regulations of the original enterprise, it is a violation of factory rules and regulations.

In the special workshop, it is not allowed to eat, out of the workshop, why is it fined?

1.This is managed in accordance with the factory work system, and the fine is issued, and the factory says that it is counted.

As long as there are such regulations in the factory, you cannot violate them.

You can eat fruit when you eat in the cafeteria and when you get home from work.

No matter in ** has its own rules and regulations, and has the absolute right to dispose of, if you repeatedly reason, the result is only bad for yourself.

This should be a regulation of the unit.

Civilized etiquette、If there are rules, follow them。

The unit is also managed in accordance with the regulations.

This depends on the rules and regulations of the factory.

Just look at the factory rules and regulations!

Now the factory is laying off employees and wants to transfer me to the workshop, but I don't want to go, and we don't have a labor contract between us! What am I going to do?

Zhihu · 3 pcs.

7 agreed.

Hello! First of all, there are two situations, one is if you don't want to go to the workshop and don't want to continue working for this company. You can be forced to terminate the employment relationship on the grounds that the employer cannot continue to provide the original position.

In this way, you can claim severance as well as double compensation for not signing an employment contract.

Another option is that if you have to continue working with this company, you will have to negotiate with the company further.

If you don't understand something, you can send me a private message.

Hope it helps!

Published on 2018-12-24 The copyright belongs to the author.

Lei Feng. Hello Mr. Li, I have been quarantined for 14 years according to the requirements of the factory to resume work, but the factory is not allowed to work.

Small emotions (questioners).

But now they don't want to pay for it.

You're referring to supra-national treatment, right? Apple's unique opportunity is that it and domestic telecom providers can achieve a win-win situation, so the policies obtained by Telecom, China Unicom, and China Mobile will be shared with Apple.

Hello, please describe the specific problem in detail.

Hello, if you need help, please call us.

For the theft of two apples in the orchard, because the amount stolen has not yet reached the standard for filing a criminal offense, it does not constitute a crime, but it is a violation of the administration of public security, and may be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Law on Penalties for the Administration of Public Security.

Article 49: Those who steal, defraud, rob, snatch, extort, or intentionally damage public or private property are to be detained for between 5 and 10 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 500 RMB; where the circumstances are more serious, they are to be detained for between 10 and 15 days, and may be concurrently fined up to 1,000 RMB.

Article 10: The types of public security administrative punishments are divided into:

a) Warning; b) fines;

3) Administrative detention;

4) Revoke permits issued by public security organs.

Foreigners who violate the administration of public security may be subject to an additional time limit for leaving the country or being deported.

Nothing is a crime, and there is a monetary limit for theft.

It depends on whether you bought this mobile phone in *** or bought it on a certain number. If it's a regular ***, you can sue him, but if you bought it somehow, then it won't work.

The first time I heard about it, alas, didn't it mean that twins can't be unraveled.

Tickets, faces can be untied to each other, and apples can be engaged.

The facial recognition of the Apple phone stores the individual's facial information into the Apple account, and each time the data is retrieved to turn on the phone.

Legal facial recognition for iPhones. You set up your facial recognition message content in your iPhone and record your messages.

Apple is not allowed to follow Chinese law, what can you do, he is an American company, if the Chinese model is not allowed to sell, you see which one dares to sell.

Apple's mobile phone is very domineering and lawless in China, and sometimes they don't think about Chinese laws.

Hello, now the court is based on Qualcomm's application to do the preservation, in order to facilitate the subsequent trial and enforcement, the decision to ban the sale of mobile phones is not the final result of the case, the final trial result depends on the judgment, and after the first-instance judgment, the judgment does not take effect of course, if Apple is not satisfied, you can appeal, the second-instance judgment is an effective judgment. As for the issue of Apple's refusal, this is not much of a problem for the court, first of all, Apple has litigants, and all of them have signed the confirmation of service address, according to the law, the court can mail the materials according to the address provided by the parties on the confirmation of the service address, and if the person refuses to sign for the delivery, it will also be deemed to have been served. For Apple's failure to comply with the decision, the court can affirm the situation, impose a fine on Apple's operation, etc.

Hopefully it can be adopted.

Trump's recent "provocations" are still less, Apple is not provoking Chinese laws, but provoking the international order, which is a hegemonic behavior. However, China's ban on the sale of Apple mobile phones is a counterattack to the United States to launch a first-class war and to safeguard the dignity of the country. Only through reform and opening up can the country progress, and if this kind of war continues, it will harm others and oneself.

Well, to put it bluntly, Apple users like us ......I'm really tired, I don't know what will happen to Apple in the future, my game account is all Apple's suit, and I have a lot of grandpa Mao, so I'm really eager for peaceful development! Mutual benefit and win-win!

All business is nothing more than making money, our country is a big consumer after all, and Apple definitely doesn't want to give up. The existence of all provocation laws will involve the word "interests", which seems to us to be provocation, and to them is helplessness.

The law does not change for the offender. Apple is just a company, nothing remarkable. Laws are national decrees that must be enforced by individuals and legal entities.

In fact, it is just Apple's disclaimer, which can be roughly seen, that is, in order to protect their own interests, they stipulate which content is within the scope of exemption, and users cannot be held accountable for these problems.