The issue of economic disputes, the issue of economic disputes

First of all, the two have their own characteristics and play their respective roles in the resolution of civil disputes, with complementary advantages and disadvantages, and the parties to the dispute can choose the corresponding dispute resolution mechanism according to the needs of their own interests. The subject of arbitration has a high degree of autonomy of will and full procedural subject rights, and the procedure is simple, the method is flexible, and the arbitration cost is low, which more reflects the benefit value of the law. On the other hand, litigation upholds the equality of the parties to the dispute to the greatest extent and protects and realizes the rights of the subject of the dispute according to its strict normative and national coercive power, so that the dispute can be finally resolved, reflecting the fair value of the law.

Secondly, the two play their respective roles equally in modern society, and are not noble because of the exercise of the state's judicial power in litigation and the coercive power of the state, nor because of the civil nature of arbitration, on the contrary, due to the development of the economy and society, the enhancement of people's legal awareness, and the further complexity of social relations, resulting in the emergence of a large number of lawsuits, which overwhelm the litigation and seriously affect the fairness and efficiency of the litigation, and the dispute resolution mechanism outside the litigation is simple, rapid and Low cost has become an important choice for people to resolve disputes, and arbitration is a typical example. Therefore, it is necessary to further strengthen the role of arbitration in the system of social dispute resolution mechanism, and at the same time promote the combination of arbitration and litigation, and actively explore and seek the best way to resolve disputes.

Economic disputes refer to disputes over rights and interests between market economy entities due to contradictions between economic rights and obligations, including disputes involving economic content between medium-sized entities and disputes involving economic content between citizens, legal persons or other organizations as administrative counterparts and administrative organs.

Summary. Can you tell us about the situation? It's convenient for you.

Can you tell us about the situation? It's convenient for you.

This person transferred 71,000 to others through me, and the premise was that he was good at investing to earn interest, and then he was deceived, and that person blocked my WeChat, and this person from 71000 is now suing me for fraud.

You have a chat history with him! or third-party certification. This is evidence, and there should be written materials before investing.

With so much money, you are also a victim. Find the beneficiary in time! You, as an intermediary, have certain responsibilities.

Don't do anything like this again.

I'm suing you, so I'd like to consult a lawyer for details. It helps you a lot.

You were the last person I chatted with, right?

I don't know, I only show the economic dispute here, there is no other question, and the specific situation is not clear here. First, do you know how to collect money? Second, why do you want to help with the transfer, third, how much do you know about the specific investment, and fourth, you need evidence.

If you introduce someone else to invest, and others don't know the third party, they can only sue you.

Later, this person robbed me of 58,000 cash, I don't know if he sued me now, yesterday he said that I was a fraud.

Do you know a third party? If you know him, find him, and if you don't, call the police. Calling the police shows that you are also a victim, so the responsibility is less. Robbing you of cash is in your favor. My opinion is for reference only.

In fact, whether you know it or not, it's best to call the police.

Summary. Dear, I am glad to answer for you: the ways and means to resolve economic disputes are as follows:

1) The two parties negotiate to settle economic disputes; (2) mediation by others to resolve economic disputes; After the occurrence of economic disputes. Both sides have their own opinions. Each has its own reasons.

No understanding could be reached. mediation requires a third party that both parties have great trust in; (3) Appointing an institution to arbitrate to resolve economic disputes; (4) The judicial organ hears the judicial organ, that is, the judicial organ hears the lawsuit. If the buyer and seller fail to negotiate, the mediation fails, and the arbitration agreement is not reached in good faith, the judicial authorities can only intervene in the economic dispute between the parties and make a final judgment.

Dear, I am glad to answer for you: the ways and means to resolve economic disputes are as follows: (1) the two parties negotiate to resolve economic disputes; (2) Mediation by others to resolve economic disputes of filial piety; After the occurrence of economic disputes.

Both sides have their own opinions. Each has its own reasons. No understanding could be reached.

Qiaohe sedan chair requires a third party who is very trusted by both parties to mediate; (3) Appointing an institution to arbitrate to resolve economic disputes; (4) The judicial organ hears the judicial organ, that is, the judicial organ hears the lawsuit. If the parties to the buyer and the seller fail to negotiate, the mediation fails, and the arbitration agreement is not reached in good faith, the judicial authorities can only intervene in the economic dispute between the parties and make a final judgment.

Legal basis: Article 9 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: People's courts hearing civil cases shall conduct mediation in accordance with the principles of voluntariness and legality; Where mediation fails, a judgment shall be made in a timely manner. 2. How long is the statute of limitations for economic disputesThe statute of limitations for economic disputes is three years.

Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions. The limitation period for litigation shall be calculated from the date on which the right holder of Li Ma knew that the rights had been damaged or should have known that the rights had been damaged and that the obligor had been committed. Where the law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.

However, where more than 20 years have elapsed since the date on which the rights were infringed, the people's courts will not grant protection, and where there are special circumstances, the people's courts may decide to extend the rights holder on the basis of the right holder's application.

My boyfriend who used to be together in the Destroyer Bureau spent tens of thousands of yuan on me when he was with him, and he refused to pay me back when he broke up.

To sue the court, you need to have evidence of the chat or an IOU. If not, it is a voluntary gift.

There is a chat record saying when I will return the borrowing, and the other party sues you and also needs evidence, and the court will not accept it without evidence.

As long as there is an IOU chat history that you admit to borrowing, you need to pay it back.

I needed to get back the money I spent, so I told him that I borrowed it from him, and that was to get back the money that belonged to me.

In turn, he's going to sue me for using those chat logs.

There are no IOUs. It's the chat history, the transfer record.

Yes. Chat logs and IOUs are required. And what you admit to borrowing.

If you don't have these records, the court will let you go back and collect evidence.

Summary. Hello dear, glad to answer for you. There are four ways and means to resolve economic disputes, which are:

1) The two parties negotiate to settle economic disputes; This practice can save costs, and the atmosphere is gentle and active, which is conducive to the development of the relationship between the two sides. (2) mediation by others to resolve economic disputes;

mediation requires a third party that both parties have great trust in; There is no essential difference between the nature of mediation and negotiation, and the final settlement can only be established if the parties agree by consensus. (3) Appointing an institution to arbitrate to resolve economic disputes;

Arbitration means that when the buyer and the seller enter into a contract, they make it clear that if there is an economic dispute in the future, they will voluntarily submit the economic dispute between them to an arbitration institution for adjudication; Or after the occurrence of an economic dispute, the buyer and the seller enter into an agreement with each other to appoint an arbitration institution to adjudicate. Arbitration is one of the main ways to resolve economic disputes. 4. Trial by judicial organs.

That is, to file a lawsuit in court. This method takes a long time and costs a lot, and the relationship between the two parties has entered a deadlock, which is not conducive to the development of both parties.

Hello dear, glad to answer for you. There are four ways and means to resolve economic disputes, namely: 1. The two parties negotiate to resolve economic disputes.

This practice can save costs, and the atmosphere is early and relaxed, and the activity is great, which is conducive to the development of the relationship between the two sides. (2) mediation by others to resolve economic disputes; mediation requires a third party that both parties have great trust in;

There is no essential difference between the nature of mediation and negotiation, and the final settlement can only be established if the parties agree by consensus. (3) Appointing an institution to arbitrate to resolve economic disputes; Arbitration means that when the buyer and the seller enter into a contract, they make it clear that if there is an economic dispute in the future, they are willing to submit the economic dispute between them to an arbitration institution for adjudication; Or after the occurrence of an economic dispute, the buyer and the seller enter into an agreement with each other to appoint an arbitration institution to adjudicate.

Arbitration is one of the main ways to resolve economic disputes. 4. Trial by judicial organs. That is, to file a lawsuit in court.

This method takes a long time and costs a lot, and the relationship between the two sides has entered a deadlock, which is not conducive to the development of both sides.

Legal basis: Article 3: The provisions of this Law apply to people's courts accepting civil lawsuits brought by citizens, legal persons, and other organizations, as well as between themselves, on the basis of property and personal relationships.

Economic disputes refer to disputes over rights and interests between market economy entities due to contradictions between economic rights and obligations, including disputes involving economic content between medium-sized entities and disputes involving economic content between citizens, legal persons or other organizations as administrative counterparts and administrative organs.

No, the 5% interest rate is already usurious and is not protected by law.

Economic disputes refer to the disputes over the rights and interests of economic entities with high market scumbags due to the contradiction between economic rights and obligations, including disputes involving economic content between medium-sized entities and disputes involving insights and economic content between citizens, legal persons or other organizations as administrative counterparts and administrative organs.

Hello! There is no need to bear criminal responsibility, and the person in charge of ** should be responsible.

Of course you can, after all, you have to pay it back before you get married.

Economic disputes refer to disputes over rights and interests between market economy entities due to contradictions between economic rights and obligations, including disputes involving economic content between medium-sized entities and disputes involving economic content between citizens, legal persons or other organizations as administrative counterparts and administrative organs.

The two of you are not in a de facto marriage, and unless the other party can prove that you gave her money as a gift, you can recover it from her.

Hello! 1

The recording must be made in the presence of 2 disinterested persons.

to be used as evidence.

2 best ways.

That is, go to the bank to check the remittance record (this is a retention period, and the bank has no record for a long time), it is best to call the staff of the notary office, which has legal effect.

It may cost a few hundred dollars in processing fees.

But the other party can't bear it.

But as long as you have evidence, you can get it back, and there's no problem with that.

You can file a lawsuit, let the court investigate, you can open a notice to collect evidence, and go to the bank to obtain remittance records.

This is no problem, except for the bank, ask a **, "Has the money arrived?" "Record it.

Economic disputes refer to the disputes over the rights and interests of economic entities with high market scumbags due to the contradiction between economic rights and obligations, including disputes involving economic content between medium-sized entities and disputes involving insights and economic content between citizens, legal persons or other organizations as administrative counterparts and administrative organs.