Complex Problems Complex problems require complex approaches to solve.

You should try to control this feeling, after all, you can only say that you have some likes and appreciation for him now, and you can't say that you are "affectionate". It's wisest to divert your attention and control your feelings as soon as possible. If you say it, I believe it will definitely bring you and your good friend and him a lot of trouble.

Let's analyze:

One is that you love him; One is that you don't love him. (Suppose it doesn't matter if he's interested in you or not.) Then you might:

One is to tell him; Or don't tell him.

Let's combine:

1. You love him and tell him.

You tell me what the result will be. At best, you hit it off, and therefore your friends don't want it. The happiness of two people is better than the embarrassment of three. That's good.

2. You don't love him, so you don't exist to tell him. No one was harmed.

3. You love him but don't tell him. This is probably your current performance, you say "like", but you don't have the courage to take on the responsibility of "love". No one was harmed.

4. You don't love him and don't tell him. Same as 2.

Let's look at the results, and you have to take the risk of losing your friend, your obligation to love, before what he thinks, whether you love him or not. Maybe you think he's bad again a minute later, what should you do? Do you have to reopen the question and re-reward? Give it up!

You should be smart. If you want to find it, you can find someone who has a heart with you and loves each other. I wish you happiness.

Can't say. Find another one.

Otherwise, he will use your feelings as his safe haven.

Women may not be very easy to come out.

But you have to think it through.

Don't lose an entire forest because of a single tree.

Do you still want your friendship? In the case that your love is not insured.

You may end up empty-handed.

It's very dangerous that your current situation is not handled well, and it will be harmful to all three of you.

Don't be stupid! He won't love you!

It is a mistake that complex problems require complex methods to solve.

The more complex the problem, the more you can't mess around, no matter what kind of problem there is, there will be a corresponding way to solve it. Generally, a problem must first be analyzed, and the complex problem should be broken down into small problems, so as to find corresponding solutions to solve them. Find a way to find the right person or thing to help solve the problem.

Problems are contradictions, and discovering problems is to discover the existence of contradictions, and to generate the need and motivation to solve contradictions, which is the process of transforming the needs of society into individual thinking activities. Finding a problem is the beginning of problem solving, and it is also the driving force for problem solving. Only by discovering problems can people be motivated and motivated to engage in problem-solving thinking activities.

Asking questions is the beginning of problem solving.

It depends on whether or not you have a comprehensive and systematic grasp of perceptual materials. Problems are always manifested in concrete facts, and only when the perceptual material of concrete facts is very abundant and in line with reality, can the contradictions be fully exposed and the main contradictions can be found out through analysis, synthesis, comparison, and so on. This is the key to clarifying the problem.

Rely on existing knowledge and experience. The richer the knowledge and experience, the easier it is to analyze the problem and grasp the main contradictions, the easier it is to classify the problem, make the thinking directional, and facilitate the selective application of the original knowledge and experience to solve the current problem.

The complex problem of scrambled numbers requires a complex method of burning the head to solve. （）

a.That's right. b.Mistake.

Correct answer to the false case: B

It is a mistake that complex problems require complex methods to solve.

Simplifying a problem is also a problem-solving process. Look at the essence from the principles of game theory and decision theory. First recognize the most basic, simple and vulgar core principles in complex problems.

Many times the problem becomes more and more complicated, that is, the problem is not in the right direction in the first place.

Because the basic law is like the most straightforward simple truth that people have to eat when they are hungry and drink water when they are thirsty. You can't get around these basic rules no matter what, and no matter how you go around in circles, you will eventually return. Recognize the factors that are consistent and contradictory to these basic principles.

To remove the contradictory factors, we should first remove them from the simplest point and remove them by encircling the point and sending reinforcements. The factors of consistency are preserved in the same way as in step 3. Learn to see the essence through the gliding image.

Everyone understands the principle that the morning glory has to hold the nose, so when we are faced with a very complex problem. First of all, we have to look at his essence and core. Only when we find the essence and core can we have a purpose.

Learn to think simply. Simple thinking is not naïve, do not use the brain, but do not go around and around to make the problem more complicated, sometimes, intuition is a very correct way of thinking. Grasp the objective law.

Everything has its own laws of development, and we must learn to find ways from them. We usually have to practice our ability to see things on our own.

Two scenarios that make things more and more complicated:

1. Trying to bypass simple basic laws leads to failure to start from the essence of the problem. In order to avoid the occurrence of this problem, Wang Yangming mentioned "goodness" in the study of mind.

2. The criterion for starting with solving the problem is to see which is the easiest rather than which is the most important. Because the most important thing is often the most stable for the core interest groups, and the breakthrough is also the most difficult. Starting with the important issues can easily arouse the vigilance of the counterparty and further complicate the problem.