Will the legal definition of murder house be abolished in a few years?

Summary. Dear, I'm glad to answer for you; Generally speaking, Chinese law does not define a murder house, so there is no question of a murder house that has died being canceled after a few years. But generally 7-8 years.

Legally, the murder house will not count after many years.

Dear, I am glad to answer for you; Generally speaking, Chinese law does not define the murderous house, so there is no question of the death of the murderous house god canceling it after a few years. But generally 7-8 years.

Legal basis: Article 147 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where civil juristic acts are carried out on the basis of a major misunderstanding, the actor has the right to request that the civil court or arbitration institution revoke them. Article 148:Where one party uses fraudulent means to cause the other party to carry out civil juristic acts in a situation contrary to their true intentions, the defrauded party has the right to request that the people's court or arbitration institution revoke it.

Article 153:Civil juristic acts that violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations are invalid. However, the mandatory provisions do not lead to the invalidity of the civil juristic act. Civil juristic acts that violate public order and good customs and pretend to be sails are invalid.

I have a property rented out, the tenant committed suicide in April last year, and in June I found that the bird He reported the case, and now it is dealt with in a good way, I now want to ** the house, do you need to inform the buyer?

Yes. I don't need to tell you how long it will take.

It has always been necessary to be informed, and there is no provision for this.

Legal Analysis: There is no definition of murder in the law. However, the seller of the house should inform the buyer of the information about the death of a person in the house, otherwise it will be contrary to public order and good customs, and may lead to the invalidity or revocation of the house sale contract.

Legal basis: Article 147 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China provides for civil juristic acts based on major misunderstandings, and the actor has the right to request the people's court or arbitration institution to revoke it.

Legal Analysis: There is no definition of murder in the law. However, the seller of the house should inform the buyer of the death of someone in the house, otherwise it will violate public order and good customs, and may also lead to the invalidity or revocation of the contract for the purchase and sale of the house.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 147:The perpetrator has the right to request that the people's court or arbitration body revoke civil juristic acts carried out on the basis of a major misunderstanding.

Article 148:Where one party uses deception to cause the other party to carry out civil juristic acts contrary to their true intentions, the defrauded party has the right to request that the people's court or arbitration institution revoke it.

Article 153:Civil juristic acts that violate the mandatory provisions of laws and administrative regulations are invalid. However, the mandatory provisions do not lead to the invalidity of the civil juristic act. Civil juristic acts that are contrary to public order and good customs are invalid.

The law allows the buyer to check out the house, and the unaware buyer has the right to request the people's court or arbitration institution to change or revoke it. The seller's deliberate concealment of the material fact of the "murderous house" violated the principle of good faith in the slow operation of civil activities, and its behavior constituted fraud. The contract signed by the two parties is a voidable contract, and the buyer, Ki Wang, can claim that the economic value of the purchased house has been reduced due to the "murderous house", and require the seller to return the purchase price and pay interest.

Eggplant Boy.

Legal Analysis Arguments:

"Repentance" is not a legal concept, and it is impossible to search for a clear definition from legal norms.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China Article 597 If the ownership of the subject matter cannot be transferred because the seller has not obtained the right to dispose of it, the buyer may terminate the contract and request the seller to bear the liability for breach of contract.

Where laws or regulations prohibit or restrict the transfer of subject matter, follow those provisions.