The child fell from the stairs and was responsible for Bear Infested , what do you think of such a

I am not satisfied with such a verdict.

I have always felt that with the development of society and economic construction, people's ideological civilization will rise, but I never expected that the style of some people made me feel speechless.

You know, when a child is a minor, his mind is the most susceptible, and this child fell from a building because of a cartoon, I think it's a matter of intelligence, what's the matter with other cartoons.

For the parents of this child who fell from the building, I am tooGravely despised and shameful, because of the lax responsibility of their own parents, but blame others.

And for the court's decision, I am also not satisfied, yesIt's off to a bad start

For this issue, I have the following.

1. Dissatisfied. This incident has attracted the discussion and attention of many netizens in 2018.

I've read the court's verdict, and it saysWhen the child Du and the child Ding were playing at home, because after watching a clip of the cartoon "Bear Infested", the child Du accidentally fell from the window of the home and died on July 29, 2018, and finally the court reached an out-of-court mediation between the animation company and the parents of the child Du, and the court ruled that the parents of the child Du should bear 80% of the responsibility, the animation company should bear 10% of the responsibility, and the parents of the child Ding should bear 10%.

After things have been fermented,The court issued a statement holding that the cartoons involved in the case produced by the "Bear Infested" animation company had plots and images that had a negative impact on the cognition of young children.

Although the animation company obtained an administrative license, the court held that the cartoon actually caused the fact that the child Du fell from the building, so there was a causal relationship between this matter and the animation company.

After the release of this information, I was not satisfied with the verdict.

2. Why am I not convinced? It is reported thatThe child Du is 8 years oldAlthough I am dead, I still have to tell the truth and be fair.

Among the 8-year-old children in my country, they have begun to go to kindergarten to receive knowledge, and they already have a preliminary understanding, but I don't know that Du does this kind of thingIs there something wrong with intelligence

After the child fell from the building, his parents openly sued the animation production company for their own reasons, and the court also ruled that the animation company was responsible, which is a bit of a thingDo the opposite, which makes me feel incomprehensible.

And then judging from the information released by the court, I also think that some people and the verdict are thereThe moral high groundto blame others.

And the national cartoon "Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf", which is similar to this incident, has also stopped.

So,The result of this incident is to bring our country's cartoons down to a limit.

Finally, I want to say, why don't these children with intellectual problems learn how to kill themselves, cat and mouse, and Ultraman fight little monsters?

I think this verdict is very correct, and it can also give people a wake-up call, and it is also the best way to deal with this matter, and it is also a good answer to the child's family, and I also hope that the animation producer should also take this as a warning and be responsible for the children.

I agree with this verdict, because some children nowadays are very imitative, and some of the pictures in the cartoon should be modified when they are broadcast, otherwise these children will be allowed to imitate.

I think "Bear Infested" does bear a certain amount of responsibility, and many of the behaviors in the film are very dangerous, which is a very bad example for children with poor judgment skills.

This result is still very good, the child will do such a thing, it is also affected by the cartoon, and the cartoon should also do a good job of safety tips.

I agree with this approach, after all, film and television dramas have a guiding effect on children, and this behavior warns that film and television dramas should be taken into account when filming in the future.

I think it's very reasonable, because this cartoon is mainly aimed at children, so when making cartoons, you must pay attention to some misleading actions, and you should also improve the quality of the cartoons.

The bear child "caused trouble, and the parents should be responsible." After the promulgation of the Family Education Promotion Law, Ming Kuan cautiously confirmed the main responsibility of parents for supervision. In the context of bringing up a baby in accordance with the law, it is necessary to strengthen the educational responsibility, educational awareness and educational ability of parents, so that children have a sense of rules.

Because according to Article 133 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of China, "if a person who lacks or has limited capacity for civil conduct causes damage to others, the guardian shall bear civil liability for the loss of caution." Article 16 clearly stipulates that:

The parents of the minor are the guardians of the minor. ”

According to these provisions, the child's guardian, i.e., their parents, should be liable for these losses caused by the bear child.

Therefore, it is necessary to remind parents that they must take care of their children, spend their own wall paintings, and drop their own things, which is not a thing, if they damage other people's things, they will have to bear the responsibility for compensation.

Recently, the case of an eight-year-old girl in Chengdu, Sichuan Province imitating the plot of "bear infested" and falling to her death was concluded. The Tribunal held thatParents are primarily responsible, and the animation producer is 10% responsible, and the award is 10,000 yuan。The plaintiff's lawyer said that the case has entered the enforcement stage.

The court held that although there were warning text prompts on the screen for some of the dangerous plots in the "Bear Infested" work produced by Huaqiang Fantawild Film, this warning method was not enough to warn the children of the ** cartoon, and Huaqiang Fantawild failed to fulfill its due duty of care, and was at fault when the damage occurred, and should bear the corresponding tort liability.

Among them, Du's parents who died bear 80% of the responsibility, Ding's parents who played with Ding bear 10%, and Huaqiang Fantawild Company bears 10%. It is reported that the plaintiff has reached an out-of-court settlement with Huaqiang Fantawild .

I agree with this result, because in the final analysis, it is the parents who do not give their children the awareness of the difference between animation and reality, which leads to this**.

I agree, because bear infestation is just a cartoon, just a medium, not the dominant factor. The main reason for this problem is that parents do not educate their children enough or do not take good care of them.

Personally, I don't agree with the outcome of this trial. First of all, the plot of the fall itself will make children imitate. The filmmaker should mark that this plot does not dare to imitate or does not appear in this kind of plot. It is somewhat surprising that parents take the primary responsibility.

When the child is young, he will definitely like cartoons, after all, cartoons have many characters in the ** will also find it very interesting. In cartoons, those young children can know relevant knowledge, which can attract them to know some of the storylines, but there is also a great harm in it. In those cartoons, there is a lack of rigor in the production, and children will imitate it after watching it, and they will not have a lot of measures when imitating, which will lead to accidents.

When the plot develops, the production staff should put a lot of logos on it, so that those children will not easily imitate these signs after seeing them. And parents should stop their children in time after seeing such enthusiastic behavior. Once a child has imitated behavior, then there is no way to reverse the consequences.

When parents guide their children, they should actually let their children have more contact with other people, play with those children, and don't let them have too much contact with electronic products, or even always play some games and cartoons. There are certain safety hazards in this, and it is not good for children. There was an eight-year-old child in Chengdu, she had an accident, when she was in ** after some episodes in "Bear Infested", she thought that climbing was very fun, so she followed suit to learn, but she didn't expect an accident.

These cases deserve our attention, and some information points to tell everyone are to care about their children, not to let children come into contact with cartoons, so that they can imitate and learn, which led to death. The eight-year-old was at home with her classmates, and in order to imitate the situation of rock climbing, she took a rope and went to climb from the sixth floor at once. Unexpectedly, the rope broke in the middle of the way, causing the child to fall from the upstairs and die.

The scene of the accident was very unbearable, and this parent also felt very sad after knowing this situation.

Her father thought that if it weren't for some of the plots in the cartoons, the child wouldn't have had such an accident, so he sued the producer of the cartoon to the people's court. After the people's court accepted the case, it felt that this happened to the child, and in fact, the parents were mainly responsible. Why can't this situation be properly solved in time, and when it is discovered that the child has this situation, it should be stopped in time.

And if this happens to the child, the producer must also bear 10% of the responsibility, so that other parents can take warning. After encountering such a situation, it can be properly resolved.

The supervision of girls is not in place, and there is a lack of guidance and education for parents to their children, and the warning and publicity of cartoons are not perfect, and the responsibility of parents is also missing, and the safety measures of balconies need to be improved.

The main focus is on the producers of bear infestation. The bear infestation itself is a children's animation, and there are plots in it that are not suitable for children and are easy for children to imitate. How can such tragedies be avoided again? This is something that the producer should consider.

I think this is a kind of lack of education now. It's like the anime we saw when we were kids were more bloody and direct than the anime we see now, but there weren't many parody plots like this at the time. In fact, in the final analysis, it is still a problem of the current way of education.

Cartoons are for children, and when children are not yet sound in their three views, it is easy to be misled by some things in cartoons and do some irreparable things, so parents also need to pay more attention to their children, guide them more, and watch less bad cartoons.

In fact, his verdict is relatively fair. Because in some cartoons, they shouldn't have some dangerous pictures in the first place. Children are completely incapable of their own judgment, and if they imitate these dangerous clips, it is very likely that their own lives will be threatened.

The girl was watching the "Bear Infested" cartoon at home and saw a certain plot in it. I thought this plot was very interesting, as if I could do it myself, so I jumped off the building of my house with a jump. In the end, because her building was really too high, she unfortunately left this world.

For her parents, it was a really big blow. Children were a future in their family, but now that hope has left them. They originally had a very happy life, but it was because of this incident that their family was ruined.

Her parents will even have conflicts because of her departure. As this conflict grows, it will also lead to the breakdown of her parents' marriage. So it seems like a small thing, but in fact, it is also a very heavy and huge loss for a family.

Nowadays, cartoons are just for the sake of good characters, and there are often some very inappropriate scenes. So I hope it can correct these mistakes well, after all, children don't understand anything.

Whatever is put in the cartoon, they may also learn it. Once they learn something bad, it is not only bad for their physical and mental health, but also very likely to put their lives in danger. And this incident also tells some parents that when taking care of their children, they must take good care of their children.

You must not be distracted, and when you leave your child in the living room, you must also close the doors and windows of the balcony. Otherwise, if this kind of tragedy happens again, I believe it will be something that everyone will not be able to accept.

We are very sorry for the departure of this girl. I also hope that some children can watch cartoons and not imitate some of the things in cartoons. Some animation studios must also remind children not to imitate these dangerous actions in some dangerous scenes.

I also hope that the parents of this child can slowly come out of this shadow. In fact, this incident is also reflected, and some inspectors in some animation production factories are unqualified. If they had tested these things to fit the child perfectly, then there would have been no such tragedy.

Therefore, it is also very fair to let the animation producer give this family a certain amount of compensation.