What is misunderstood in the Analects?

If there are three people in the Analects, then there must be what my teacher knows for knowing, and not knowing for not knowing. These are some of the more important sentences in the Analects, but I don't know much about what has been misread and misunderstood in the Analects.

For example, in the Analects, there are friends from afar, and they are happy? This sentence is easy to give people a misunderstanding, for example, learning without thinking is reckless, thinking without learning is dead.

However, women and villains are difficult to raise, this sentence has been misunderstood, Confucius did not want to express the meaning that women are villains, and there is also lust, which is not a reason for lust.

The most typical example is: self-denial and revenge. gram, the original meaning is to be able; Fu, the original meaning is to repeat, repeat.

Self-denial is to be able to keep repeating the rites. By extension: overcome your own selfish desires, let your behavior meet the requirements of etiquette, and abide by the requirements of etiquette.

Can, by extension, is: to overcome, control, and overcome the "cannot". Repetition, repetition, and by extension:

Compliance, compliance.

Many of the more famous sentences in the Analects have been misunderstood, and this great work should have been interpreted more accurately.

Personally, I think there are a lot of misunderstandings and misinterpretations in the Analects, because it is in the form of classical Chinese in ancient times, hey, we are now in the form of vernacular Chinese, and many words have different meanings from the original, for example, only women and villains are difficult to raise.

I don't think there is anything that is easy to misunderstand in the Analects, after all, the verbal expression of classical Chinese and modern speech is inconsistent, and it should be translated according to classical Chinese.

There are many misunderstandings in the Analects, threesomes, there must be my teacher, I always thought that one of the three people must be my teacher, but in fact, this is not the meaning.

The Analects is not something that Confucius made or said alone, but a summary of what Confucius said to his students or students of Confucius.

The Analects are science and learning. It can serve any form of social system, just as physics and chemistry can serve any social use.

Many people think that the Analects are all about kindness, so people should be born kind, and no matter what others do to you, you must remain kind, but I don't think it's right.

Nowadays, some parents ask their children to memorize the Analects, but the children do not understand the meaning, the Analects are to teach us the principles of how to behave and deal with things, not only children can learn.

One of the four books of the Analects of Composition, naturally has his own reason.

The Analects can solve the confusion in our life, settle our hearts, and find the starting point and destination of solving problems.

For example, at the beginning of a person, he understands that filial piety is the foundation of a person, and he has a basic direction of life, which is generally not out of line.

After entering the school, it is clear that the scholars of the ancients are their own, and learning becomes a happy thing.

Make friends, don't be friends as good as yourself, friends are straight friends, forgive friends, and see the wisdom of the people, in order to continue to mention yourself.

As for work, he is sensitive to action and cautious in words, and his words are especially remorseful, and his deeds are remorseful.

In life, do not do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Bow to yourself, blame others, far away from resentment, and close to a happy life.

Let us understand a lot of basic principles of life, and at the same time improve the ability to distinguish between right and wrong.

Original text: Confucius and the Analects

Sensitive and studious, not ashamed to ask.

Knowing is knowing, not knowing is not knowing, and knowing is knowing.

Knowing it tacitly, never getting tired of learning, never tireless of teaching.

Translation: A person who is gifted and intelligent and eager to learn is not ashamed to ask for advice from someone who is lower in status and less knowledgeable than himself.

To know is to know, not to know is not to know, and that is true wisdom.

Silently remember what you have learned, learn not to feel satisfied, teach people not to know tiredness.

The knowledge and views of the Analects are as follows:Recognize:Some of the ambiguities that arise in the process of reading the Analects arise from the evaluation of Confucius and his learning.

According to the literal intuitive understanding, it seems that Confucius was negligent and simplistic towards the common people, regarded the people as only objects to be driven, and opposed the development of the people's wisdom, which somewhat contained a certain element of foolishness. This seems to have damaged the glorious image of Confucius as a sage, so some people have twisted it up and said that Confucius was excused by changing the way the sentence was read in order to maintain his lofty and sacred status.

Views:I think most of his books are the best of the best, but there are also things that are not worth using. The idea of the Analects is Confucianism, which runs through the golden mean, the way of benevolence and righteousness.

In fact, this is the root of Chinese culture, the birthplace of Chinese culture, and the prototype of the state of etiquette. It is precisely this kind of thinking that makes the Chinese people have this kind of middle-of-the-road nature from the bones, lack radical thinking, like to stick to the rules, and the sense of innovation is far less obvious than that of Westerners.

Analect Value:The Analects is one of the Confucian classics. Since Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty "deposed the hundred schools of thought and respected Confucianism alone", the Analects has been revered as "the jurisdiction of the Five Classics and the throat of the six arts", and is a first-hand source for the study of Confucius and Confucianism, especially the original Confucianism.

During the Southern Song Dynasty, Zhu Xi combined the "University", "The Mean", "The Analects" and "Mencius" into the "Four Books", making its status in the Confucian classics increasingly high. During the Yanyou period of the Yuan Dynasty, the imperial examination began to be opened with the "Four Books".

The above content refers to: Encyclopedia - Analects.

1 [People don't know and are not ashamed, and they are not gentlemen].

2 Original text [Zi said: "If you don't suffer from people, you don't know yourself, and you don't know people when you suffer." From "The Analects of Learning".

Translation: Confucius said, "Don't worry that others don't understand you, only worry that you don't understand others." ”

Comment: Worry, worry.

People: refers to other people.

Not knowing: The inversion of "not knowing oneself", not knowing oneself, is the preposition of the pronoun object in the negative sentence.

Zhi: particle, unintentional.

Can't: No ability (talent).

Also: the same, equal.

People don't know me, but I'm still me, so I don't have anything to lose. The so-called "people don't know and don't get upset" is not worth worrying, let alone complaining.

Opposite. "It is difficult to draw the skin and bones of a tiger, and you don't know the face but not the heart. "If I don't understand others, I don't know what is right and wrong, and I can't get close to good people and stay away from bad people, which is something to worry about.

Of course, that being said, it's not easy to actually do it. Therefore, the sage not only tells us in the opening chapter of "Xueer": "People do not know and are not ashamed, and they are not gentlemen?

And in the last chapter, he again said earnestly: "If you don't suffer from others, you don't know yourself, and you don't know people when you suffer." The whole story echoes from beginning to end.

When others do not understand or even misunderstand themselves, Confucius believes in the Analects that the attitude that should be adopted is "People do not know and are not ashamed, and are they not gentlemen?" "I don't have any impression of understanding other people's sentences, so I have to find a sentence, [Zi said: "See the virtuous and think together, and see the unvirtuous and introspect."

Source: "The Analects of Liren"] When you see a person who is virtuous or talented, you should think about learning from him, and when you see a person who is not virtuous, you should reflect in your heart whether there is a mistake like him. The premise of doing this is that you must fully understand the other party before you can judge whether he is virtuous or not. I think there's a more appropriate saying.

Sun Tzu: Seeking Attack: "Knowing each other and knowing oneself, you will not be defeated in a hundred battles; Knowing oneself without knowing the other, one wins and one loses; I don't know who I am, I don't know myself, I will die in every battle. "In military strife, if you know both the enemy and yourself, there will be no danger in a hundred battles; If you don't know the enemy but only yourself, you have half the probability of victory or defeat; If you don't know the enemy and you don't know yourself, then there is danger in every battle.

This quote speaks volumes about the importance of knowing others.

While it's understandable that we misread and misunderstand, let's not take it for granted. In order to understand sentences correctly, we need to understand the author's era, the author's personality, and then figure out what his intention is. Only by maintaining a scientific and rigorous learning attitude can our learning ability continue to improve, and can we bravely climb the "Mount Everest" of knowledge.

Thinking twice before acting, people misunderstand that you need to think more before you can act, in fact, there is a sentence behind Confucius, telling everyone that it is difficult to achieve things if you think too much.

Example sentence 1: Parents are here, not far away - "The Analects of Liren".

This sentence is usually understood to mean that when our parents are alive, we do not travel far away. But in fact, the original text of this sentence is: "Parents are here, don't travel far, there must be a way to travel." ”

What this sentence really means is: if the parents are old and alive, the children should try not to stay away for a long time. If you have to do it, you must tell your parents to go and why, and when you will come back. And arrange for the provision of parents.

The threesome must have my teacher, choose the good ones to follow, and the bad ones to change, not to ask these three people how to correct, but to learn from the good side of the positive people among them, and then correct the negative side of themselves and the bad ones.

"Parents are here, don't travel far" Many people know this sentence, but there is a sentence behind this sentence "There must be a way to travel".

The correct interpretation of misunderstandings is the interpretation of Confucian scholars! Confucius was also a human being, and he also ate and drank Lazar. Isn't there anything wrong with his philosophy? Isn't over-reading errors contrary to Confucius' thought? Isn't there a lack of kindness?

"The people may let it be done, but they cannot know it. This sentence is the most misunderstood! If Confucius engaged in "fooling the people", how could he become a great educator?!

In fact, Confucius said that "repay grievances with virtue, how to repay virtue?" In fact, it is a denial of repaying grievances with virtue.

As for the misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the Analects, I think that in the Analects, there are indeed some pronunciations or interpretations of current words, which are still easy to be misunderstood and misunderstood.

There are a lot of misunderstandings about this, for example, in some places, many people just read that sentence and say that he means it, and then they will misunderstand him.

There are many misinterpretations and misunderstandings in the Analects, such as my favorite opening section, which many people misunderstand.

Many people can't read the Analects, because there are many problems, because the thinking of ancient people is also a little different from that of modern people, so it is inevitable that there will be many misunderstandings, just be careful and careful.

Confucius had a poor sense of philosophy, often emphasizing one aspect and ignoring the other (e.g., parents are there, not traveling). It's about filial piety to one's parents, ignoring one's obligations to the state, etc.).

Parents are here, not far away. If people do not do it for themselves, the heavens and the earth will be destroyed. If a person does not practice his own virtues (improve and improve his own shortcomings), then heaven will not tolerate it!

Many people have misunderstood the Analects, so we have to look at them from a dialectical point of view.

Threesome, there must be my teacher. We should learn from all kinds of people, not just saints and successful people.

In fact, there should be a lot of it, many people don't read the whole article, but only read a few words and guess the meaning.

Thirty and stand, forty is not confused, fifty and knows the destiny of heaven, sixty and the ear is obedient, seventy and does what the heart wants, and does not exceed the rules.

Reading the Analects Reading different artistic conceptions is the wisdom of the Analects.

There are a lot of misreadings and misunderstandings in the Analects, and I think this kind of misreading and misunderstanding is really embarrassing.