Be good at discarding answers, be good at discarding reading answers

Question 1 tests the ability to grasp the arguments. The title of this article itself is a clear judgment that indicates the author's views and attitudes towards "abandonment". If you read the whole article, you will find that all the paragraphs of the article revolve around the discussion of "abandonment".

In the first paragraph, the author clearly points out that "we are good at giving up in our choices", and at the end of the article, he reiterates that "we give up when it is time to give up". The main part of the article is even more closely focused on "being good at abandoning" to cite facts and reason, and to go deeper and discuss layer by layer. This question should also be clear:

The argument should be one that expresses affirmative (......Hide ......Analyze and argue from the perspective of enduring pain in order to succeed, and finally come to the conclusion that success can be achieved by making use of strengths and avoiding weaknesses.

Example 1: There is value in sacrificing individual interests for the sake of the collective good.

Example 2: In order to strengthen one's strengths, it is valuable to give up one's weaknesses.

Example 3: For the sake of long-term development, it is valuable to sacrifice immediate interests.

Really? 、

1.We need to be good at giving up.

2.Prove the author's point of view from the perspective of the importance of being good at discarding.

3.First, he cites the example of Asimov's clever renunciation to achieve success, then analyzes and argues from the perspective that he needs to endure pain in order to succeed, and finally concludes that he can succeed by making use of his strengths and avoiding his weaknesses.

1 Let us be good at renunciation.

2 The author's point is demonstrated from the point of view of the importance of being good at discarding.

3 First, he cites the example of Asijan's clever renunciation and success, then analyzes and argues from the perspective that abandonment requires suffering in order to succeed, and finally concludes that making the most of one's strengths and avoiding one's weaknesses can lead to success.

4 Li Chen's point of view is correct, and it is enough to be reasonable.

Can you type out the article?

1 All 1, fish, I want also; Bear's paws, as well as I want. You can't have both, and you can't have both, and those who give up the fish and take the bear's paw are also. "Fish and bear's paws are available, of course, the most desirable, but this possibility is often the smallest.

In general, you need to choose between fish and bear's paws, even if you only get fish. It's also a success; If you are unwilling to give up any of them, you will blindly pursue "both" of fish and bear's paws. In the end, nothing is gained, and that is the tragedy.

2. The European golden eagle, known as the "king of birds", only gives birth to two young birds in a nest. Sometimes, due to lack of food, the two young birds will "kill each other", and the stronger one will squeeze the weaker one out of the nest and fall to death at the bottom of the cliff. Faced with the reality of starving two young birds or preserving one young bird, the golden eagle mother has no choice but to tolerate this cruel "abandonment".

After the Northeast wolf was caught by the hunter's Tie Yangyang, faced with the two options of breaking the leg and losing his life, he resolutely bit off the leg that was clamped, and then retreated. With this painful and decisive "abandonment", the Northeast wolf saved his life.

3. Isaac Asimov, the world's top science fiction writer, has been engaged in biochemistry research and teaching. in research and teaching. He found out that he had the genius to create science fiction, so he made a calm and objective analysis of himself:

I'm unlikely to be a first-rate scientist, but I could be a first-class sci-fi artist. Asimov said goodbye to his university classes and labs and returned home to devote himself exclusively to writing. Asimov's clever abandonment has achieved the brilliant achievement of creating 480 science fiction books in his lifetime, and has also won him the honorary title of the world's most prestigious science fiction writer.

Renunciation is sometimes painful. But if you can't endure the pain for a while, you may have to suffer for the rest of your life. It was undoubtedly painful for Asi to abandon the laboratory and the lectern where he spent his days and nights, but it was precisely because he endured the pain for a while that he achieved the great cause that followed.

If he does not give up, it could cause Asimov a lifetime of pain and remorse. It is also a pity for the world. Asimov's clever renunciation is his own happiness, as well as the luck of his readers and the world.

The case of Asi-Tsufu tells us that if you don't have an advantage in something, but you insist on it again and again, always trying to turn your weakness into an advantage, you are likely to achieve nothing. Giving up one's weaknesses is to strengthen one's strengths and bring oneself closer to the goal of success.

4. Sun Tzu said: If you want to take it, you must give it first.

5. Horses can adventure, but Litian is not as good as cattle; A strong car can carry heavy loads, and it is not as good as a boat to cross the river; It is difficult for the planner to be perfect. - Gu Sixie.

6. How happy are the people who have to give and take, and the unfortunate miser is unlucky. - Rudaki.

Reading Questions: 1What is the main point that the author of this article wants to make? (1 point) 2From which point does the paragraph prove the author's point of view? (2 points) 3Briefly analyze the process of argumentation in a paragraph. (3 points).

2.The author's point is proved from the point of view of the importance of being good at discarding.

3.First, he cites the example of Asimov's clever renunciation and success, then analyzes and argues from the perspective that abandonment requires suffering in order to succeed, and finally concludes that success can be achieved by making the most of his strengths and avoiding his weaknesses.

4.If the point of view is correct, it is enough to be reasonable.