My mother gave the house to one of them, and now she refuses to raise it, what should I do?

If the real estate certificate of the house has been transferred, there is basically no way to get it back, but if the agreement is made at the beginning and the other party is needed to provide for the elderly, this is a paid gift, and if the donee does not perform the agreement, the gift can be withdrawn.

Hello, the mother gave the house, and one of the children is now not supporting him, and this situation can be sued in court, thank you.

Hello, my mother gave the house to one of them, and now she refuses to raise it, what should I do? This situation can only be negotiated, if the house does not have your mother's name, and he is not itchy, then it can only be negotiated and negotiated, if not, call your mother to go to the court to sue, this is also the last step, hope, thank you.

The mother does not care whether she gives the house to one of the children or not. All children have the responsibility to support the elderly. If you refuse to support them, you can go directly to the court to sue.

Hello, in this case, you can negotiate first, and if the negotiation fails, you can sue him.

Now I don't want to raise it, so it's not good. So at this time, the child must take out this house in this month, so that it can be fair.

If the mother gives the house to one of the children and now the child refuses to raise it, she can file a lawsuit with the people's court to demand that the child pay for her maintenance.

If the child gets the mother's real estate but is not able to fulfill the obligation to support the child, the mother can take the child to court, which is generally accepted by the court, and the child has the obligation to support the elderly.

The house was given to him, if she was not willing to provide for the elderly. Now you can renegotiate whether the house is half of the house and take turns to take care of your old mother, which is fairer

Judging from your description, the mother gave the house to one of them, but now refuses to provide for the elderly, in this case, you can sue him through the court, and protect your legitimate rights and interests through legal means, and continue to fulfill your pension obligations.

If that's the case, then look at the house, did she write paperwork when one of her children was there? If he didn't write it, he would have the house back, and if he didn't give it, he would file a lawsuit, and the kid had no evidence to prove that the house was his.

I gave the house to one of the children, and now the child refuses to provide for the elderly, so what should I do, then I want the house back. Give the house to whom, or sell the house and give the money to the children who support the elderly.

The mother gave the house, and one of them refuses to raise it now, this can be sued in law, even if she does not give the house, she must support the elderly as a child.

My mother gave the house to one of them, and now she refuses to raise it, what should I do? Supporting the elderly is the obligation of every child, and if he does not support him, he can go to the court to sue.

Then your mother can take him to court, as a child has the obligation to support the elderly, and he takes your mother's house and refuses to support it, he can ask the court to enforce it.

You can negotiate that the person who wants the house will either take it out or continue to support the mother.

In this case, it is a gift, and if a refusal to adopt is initiated, the mother can revoke the gift of the house.

There is no good way to do this, since his mother gave him the house. It is said that he should provide for his mother's old age, and this problem can be solved through legal means.

No matter which one he gives it to, he thinks that his children have the obligation to support the elderly, and if the other party refuses to support the elderly, the old man can take him to court.

Judging from your description, it must be that the child is not filial, and such a problem can go to the court to sue and will definitely support the mother.

Do you mean that the mother gave the house to one of them, but the person refused to support it? You can sue him.

Your question is to ask the mother who gave the house to one of the children, and now she refuses to provide for the elderly? In this case, since he is no longer old-aged, then he can return this house.

Don't worry too much, your parents need to be supported, not if you have a house, and it's not enough to raise you.

There is no way, if there is really no way to communicate and coordinate, you can only prosecute, right?

Your mother gave the room to one of them. But the other party refused to raise it again. You can go through the legal path to solve it.

Of course, this is not possible, otherwise the house will be repossessed for auction.

Hello. Of course, it is still difficult to raise children to prevent old age, of course, better conditions are needed, so that such a fine tradition can be better developed.

I think it may be that this person is irresponsible, because this is his own house, and it should be up to him to repay the loan of the house, because he is the one who lives in it.

What does it mean that my mother gave the house to one of them, and now she refuses to raise it? Do you mean that you want this person who has a house to support his mother? Other children should also support their mothers.

I gave the house to one of them first, and now it doesn't. What should I do if it's itchy? Then he does not support you, and you should not give it to whoever serves you, and whoever feeds you, you give it to whomever you want.

Summary. The conditions for revocation of the gift of real estate are: the donee seriously infringes on the donor or the donor's close relatives; The donee has an obligation to support the donor but fails to perform it; The donee does not perform the obligations stipulated in the gift contract.

The donor's right of revocation shall be exercised within one year from the date on which the donor knew or should have known the reason for revocation. The right of revocation of the heirs of the donor or the legal person shall be exercised within six months from the date on which the reason for revocation is known or should be known.

Hello. If it is a corresponding property, as long as the transfer has not been registered, then it can be returned.

Transferred. If the transfer is made, then it can only be done in the mother's way, and you have to go back.

That is, in the process of giving, the giver. Repudiation is subject to legal conditions.

Are you going to come back?

How can the mother sue?

Your mother's words are the right of revocation of the donor.

The conditions for revocation of the gift of real estate are: the donee seriously infringes on the donor or the donor's close relatives; The donee has an obligation to support the donor but fails to perform it; The recipient does not perform the obligations agreed in the gift contract. The donor's right of revocation shall be exercised within one year from the date on which the donor knows or should know the reason for revocation.

The right of revocation of the heirs of the donor or the legal person shall be exercised within six months from the date on which the reason for revocation is known or should be known.

What's wrong with the mage program?

In this case, it is in the name of your mother as the plaintiff, and then file a lawsuit with the people's court to demand that the other party return it.

At that time, my younger siblings and my mother agreed that now my main mother has no house.

At that time, whether or not they agreed, they could be searched for it back, so they filed a lawsuit with the people's court to demand that the other party fulfill the corresponding maintenance obligations, revoke the obligations, and revoke the corresponding gifts.

The other party also paid for the house according to the welfare price.

If the house payment is given, then it must not be a gift, that is, it belongs to the corresponding sale. That's definitely not going to come back.

If you have the conditions, you will explain them at one time, and do not add one condition at a time, which will affect the corresponding judgment and will also affect the suggestions to you.

<> when Aunt Zhang first got married, the conditions at home were very ordinary, and her life was very poor. Later, she gave birth to a son, and her mother-in-law was very good to her, because her mother-in-law was afraid that her grandson would suffer, so her mother-in-law often sent them some delicious food. When Aunt Zhang's son was 3 years old, Aunt Zhang became pregnant again, and the mother-in-law was better to her daughter-in-law, because the mother-in-law looked forward to her daughter-in-law adding a little girl to the family, so a son and a daughter in their family would make up a good word.

After a few months, Aunt Zhang really gave birth to a girl, not to mention how happy the mother-in-law was, but the mother-in-law did not take long to get old, and the villagers said that Aunt Zhang was happy, and some said that the mother-in-law went to the communiqué. Since her in-laws left, Aunt Zhang has gotten several houses, and because her in-laws have many houses, after they all died, the house was inherited to herself.

Not long after, Aunt Zhang's husband died in an accident, and at this time, Aunt Zhang was sad and she was also happy, because her property was getting more and more. When Aunt Zhang's children grew up, she thought that she would not worry about living in the house in the future, but Aunt Zhang was very concerned about the family's property, and her children could not go to the house at all.

Later, Mrs. Zhang's children also built a few simple houses for themselves through their own efforts, and the people in the village said that Mrs. Zhang's children were very promising, but the children didn't think so, because they felt that their mother was too picky, so they had to work hard now.

After a few years, because Aunt Zhang is older, so she must take care of her children, but she is the only one in the family, when the children know that their mother is not in good health, the children are coming, then Aunt Zhang is very happy, thinking that her children will take care of her, but in the end, the children are asking Aunt Zhang for a house, and the daughter said: "Mom, if you give me a house, I will take care of you, if you don't give me a share, then I won't take care of it." Aunt Zhang was very sad when she heard her daughter's words, she originally thought that her daughter would not take care of herself, what about her son?

Who would have thought that in the end, after the son had to let Aunt Zhang give him a house, he would also take care of his mother, and then the mother was even more cold, so she said to the two children: "I expected it a long time ago, you guys should leave quickly!" After Aunt Zhang finished speaking, the two children left.

In the end, Aunt Zhang grew old alone.

The eldest mother lacks a sense of security and is unwilling to give the house to her children first, and it is the obligation of the children to support their parents, and they should not refuse on the grounds of the house.

I think this is the most unfilial place to be a child, I can't say that the mother does not give a house and gives up the responsibility of supporting the mother, it is not easy for parents to pull us up since childhood, filial piety or not filial piety to parents can not look at the material, to rely on the heart, or your children will take you as an example, and end up with the same fate as your mother.

There is an old saying that the mother is not kind to the son and is not filial, and he does not treat the child sincerely, so he can't get the sincere treatment of the child when he is old, and he never reflects on whether he has done the right thing.

Growing up under the red flag, young and inspirational to serve the country, selfless dedication, no attempt to reciprocate, the country needs to be the first ......Now it is difficult for people to believe and understand, but in the generation of parents, it is really universal, they struggle all their lives, but also to save money to raise our children, when they are old, the passbook is empty, unfortunately they don't even have a house, and they are lucky to leave a set of ancestral homes.

With such a house, some children still have to rob it, which is really unbearable. Since ancient times, filial piety has come first, don't talk about the house, even if you eat, your parents should eat first. Zhu Yuanzhang watched his parents starve to death when he was a child, and felt guilty all his life.

This title is recorded in history, and it is hundreds of billions of times more noble than his parents' house, which shows that Zhu Yuanzhang is filial piety. It is a model for future generations.

If the children are really stupid enough to rob their parents' homes, although the parents have educational negligence, but the nature of the evildoer is difficult to change, now it is a legal society, parents must not continue to connive at the depravity of their children, they must immediately resort to the law, hand over the unfilial son to the court for adjudication, and decisively cancel the unfilial son's right to inherit property. Only in this way can there be a chance to wake up the unfilial son, if the unfilial son has experienced a lesson and truly reformed himself, it is not too late for the parents to make a will and give away property.

Pity the hearts of parents all over the world, which parents are willing to beat their children ruthlessly, but when their children are obsessed with their hearts, they must be beaten hard, not for themselves, but for their children to wake up and be righteous in the future. First of all, she has a bad mentality, this house is your mother's pension house, and she must leave it for your mother until she is a hundred years old.

Secondly, your house was also given by your parents, not inherited, what does it matter to her? Legally speaking, your mother's current house will only be half of one person in the future.

Finally, according to the traditional view, daughters who marry outside do not inherit the inheritance of their parents. I think you can let your uncle judge the reasoning, and it is said that this is also decided by your uncle, and by the way, convince your mother.

If she doesn't admit it, you can find out the contract you made at the time or find a witness, and if you don't admit it, you can sue her in court and let the court decide on it.

Write the separation agreement before giving her a room.

According to the principle of combining inheritance and maintenance, if your sister wants her mother's property, she must bear the obligation to take care of the elderly, otherwise she has the right to take it back.

Have a good talk with her, if there was an agreement at the beginning, it would be best if there were no witnesses, and if the negotiation could not be resolved, the court would decide.