Why is the school a school that boys are not allowed to have long hair?

Could it be for the teachers and school leaders who care for the Mediterranean hairstyle? Since work, I have encountered a hair loss crisis, and the student period is the time when the hair is luxuriant, every Monday morning meeting and class, looking at the lush hair below, will cause a heavy blow to the teachers of the Mediterranean hairstyle, for this reason, the ban on male students to have long hair, will it be for the teachers and school leaders who care for the Mediterranean hairstyle?

The way of education in China is different from that of other countries, and the culture is also different, so it cannot be compared. Boys are not allowed to have long hair in schools, and their view is that students should look like students.

Short hair spirit.

Long hair looks like it affects the face of the school.

The landlord rebelled....The boys still have a normal hairstyle...It is necessary to have a correct world outlook, outlook on life, and values.

What do you mean by guys with long hair? Braided at the back of the head like a girl, or do you have bangs that don't cover your ears and shoulders? If it's the former, then the boy definitely can't stay, it will look weird.

If it's the latter, you just don't have those weird hairstyles that kill Matt.

I can understand that if you can't wear a hair (boys and girls), but the key is that the school doesn't even keep the heads of Japanese students (boys).

Growing long hair makes people feel like you're socially trendy, right? Have you ever thought that you are still a student who only spends money???

The school's control of the issue violates the law and violates the student's right to personal liberty. A citizen's right to personal liberty refers to the right of a citizen to be at his or her own disposal and control, and not to be arrested, detained, searched, or infringed upon without legal procedures. And hair is a part of the human body and is at the disposal and control of the citizens themselves.

The school's regulations directly restrict the personal freedom of citizens and infringe on the right of students to personal freedom.

Legal analysis. It is a violation of the law to limit the length of hair, which is usually practiced. The freedom to retain hair is the basic right of the student, and the restriction of the student's right to personal freedom can only be carried out to the extent necessary for the purpose of education.

The Commission on Human Rights advises the Minister of Education and the supervisors of education in all municipalities and provinces to take active measures to address the phenomenon of forced haircuts on students, and to reflect the opinions of students when formulating and revising school regulations that limit the length of hair. The Commission also advised the Department of Education and the Ministry of Education to impose sanctions on schools for potentially violating provisions, which were unlawful. The right to personal liberty refers to the right of citizens to act independently within the scope of the law without interference from others, not to be illegally arrested or detained, not to be unlawfully deprived of or restricted from liberty, and not to be illegally searched for their bodies.

The inviolability of personal freedom is the minimum and most basic right of citizens and a prerequisite for citizens to participate in various social activities and enjoy other rights. It is the personality right of citizens to act and think according to their own will and interests, without being restricted, controlled or hindered. Also known as bodily freedom.

Schools enforce immunity to the law to the extent permitted by law, but if they exceed the scope, they are subject to punishment.

Legal basis. Article 37 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China The personal freedom of citizens of the People's Republic of China shall not be violated. No citizen shall be arrested without the approval or decision of the people's procuratorate or the decision of the people's court, and is enforced by the public security organs.

It is forbidden to illegally detain or otherwise unlawfully deprive or restrict a citizen's personal liberty, and to illegally search a citizen's body.

Summary. Boys are allowed to have long hair, but the school does not allow boys to have long hair because it is necessary to manage the students, not to interfere with your freedom, and if you agree to have long hair alone, it will cause chaos in the management of the school.

Boys are allowed to have long hair, but the school does not allow boys to have long hair because it is necessary to manage the students, not to interfere with your freedom, and if you agree to have long hair alone, it will cause chaos in the management of the school.

Schools generally have requirements for the length of boys' hair.

Otherwise, there can't be a hairstyle outside: the student's head.

So, boys try not to have long hair.

Ask about custom messages].

I believe that many students have seen how strict the school's hairstyle regulations are, but many students do not understand such regulations, in fact, the school's hairstyle regulations for students are nothing more than based on two factors: learning factors and environmental factors.

In the student stage, many students are not cognitively sound, it is easy to compare with their appearance, and hair is undoubtedly the key area used by many students to compare, if the school stipulates that all students have similar hairstyles can reduce similar troublemaker behavior, so that students can grow up in a more sunny environment.

In addition, longer hair also needs students to spend more time to take care of, every morning just washing hair, blowing hair takes a long time, taking up a lot of students' rest time, in addition to long hair is easy to become a tool for students to slip in class, so the school stipulates that students need to cut short hair for a long time.

Although the school forces students to cut their hair, there is a bias in the way and method, but in the management regulations, the restrictions on hairstyles also have a certain reason, and as a student, the most important task is to learn and improve their own grades, so that they can have a better growth state, and students want to improve their grades, they need to have more efforts.

Be clear about your problem, legally speaking, and it is not reasonable. The school just makes the rules and whether or not to comply with them. If you are punished for not following the school's regulations on hairstyles, it needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis, but the school does not have the right to suspend or withdraw you from school because of the "No School-Restricted Hairstyles", and will only suspend or withdraw from school if you are a "major sanction".

For the sake of students' physical and mental health and the overall image of the school, the school stipulates the hairstyle of students, and it is understandable to prohibit some ** hairstyles, and there is nothing wrong with it, and the law does not explicitly prohibit the school from making such provisions. As parents of students, you should also fully support the school's approach. After all, it's a good thing for kids.

However, regulation and coercion are two different concepts. Although schools can set school rules and discipline to regulate students' hairstyles, schools are educational institutions, not compulsory departments, and do not have the power to enforce them. The school can only explain the requirements for students' hairstyles, but they do not have the power to force students to cut their hair.

If individual teachers or schools impose penalties such as forced haircuts, suspension of classes, or even dissuasion from school for students who do not comply with school rules. That would be a violation of the student's right to body and education, and it would be illegal.

A student's hair is part of his or her body, and a citizen's right to body is protected by law and no one may infringe upon a citizen's right to body for any reason. It can be seen that the school's act of forcing the student to cut off his hair is an act of violating the student's bodily rights.

According to the laws of our country: "Where a natural person has suffered an unlawful infringement of the following personality rights and files a lawsuit with the people's court requesting compensation for moral damages, the people's court shall accept it in accordance with law: (1) the right to life, health, or body; Where the infringement causes mental harm to a person and serious consequences are caused, the people's court may, on the basis of the request of the victim, order the infringer to bear civil liability such as stopping the infringement, restoring the reputation, eliminating the impact, and making a formal apology.

Therefore, if the school's request to force a student to cut his or her hair causes serious mental damage to the student, the school can be required to compensate for the spiritual solace!