Can primary school students debate online, and how can the positive side ask the opposite side to de

Updated on educate 2024-06-12
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Haha, I'm leaning towards the positive side - Mr. Black.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Online games affect our normal learning, it will make us fascinated, and finally play with things and give up their studies, this is because our teenagers still do not have strong self-control, and they also need the help and guidance of parents, so teenagers are doing more harm than good online!

    Teenagers will waste a lot of time on the Internet, resulting in a decline in academic performance, not to mention that the Internet can help you learn, if the Internet can really help you improve your grades, why should the country invest so much manpower and material resources to improve our educational institutions? Even if you can learn knowledge online, why do you still carry your school bag to school every day? Wouldn't it be better to simply go home and go online and study on your own?

    Save parents thousands of dollars every year for you to go to school!

    Excessive use of the internet is detrimental to people's health and social interactions. Carnegie? Robert of Mellon?

    Kraut and his colleagues conducted a personality assessment of some of the subjects who started using the Internet and the year or two after they started using the Internet, and found that the more time people spent online, the less they communicated with their loved ones, the fewer friends they had in real life, and the more lonely and depressed they felt. So, going online can do more harm than good.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    In fact, there are pros and cons for primary school students to surf the Internet, if they are under the guidance of teachers and parents, they will gain at that time, but if they go online at will, they will cause addiction, affect learning and rest, and will let primary school students get in touch with some bad ** and content early.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Because it broadens my horizons, but if it's good for my studies, I'm the same.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    1. It is a medicine that is three points poisonous, can we not use this medicine because of that little bit of ***? Can we stop cars from running on the road because of traffic accidents? Can we think that teenagers are doing more harm than good online because of the small bad effects of the Internet?

    2。If it is true that primary school students can do more harm than good to surf the Internet, why do we have computer classes in primary schools? Is it that we are all stupid to drill into the bad?

    3。The development of the network is inevitable, and the objective law cannot be violated.

    4。You first got the problem wrong, it's a half-name proposition and not a full-term proposition! As we all know, eating more nutritious fruits and vegetables is good for people, and eating indiscriminately without regularity is definitely not good.

    Therefore, it must be wrong to think that fruits and vegetables do more harm than good to people! It's the same with the web.

    5。According to the survey, the number of deaths due to traffic accidents in China exceeds 100,000 every year, ranking first in the world. And how many die from the Internet? We have not banned the passage of vehicles for the loss of 10 lives, why do we still think that primary school students can do more harm than good and restrict the Internet?

    6.We have been exposed to the Internet since we were children, and we have never seen the other party's defense friends addicted to it, and we can't extricate ourselves. We can't stand and talk without backache when we grow up, and restrict the Internet access for today's primary school students.

    The other party's words may ask: Do you admit that some primary school students are addicted to the Internet and abandon their studies?

    A: We also agree that students who are addicted to the Internet will delay their studies, and as a minor, they need the guidance of their parents, so we can't say that it is the fault of the Internet just because we are at fault.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The reason for this is that it is beneficial for primary school students to use the Internet appropriately, and it is very beneficial for them to learn a lot about the Internet by properly checking information on the Internet.

Related questions
7 answers2024-06-12

I think we should look at the Internet of primary school students dialectically, there are both advantages and disadvantages. In short, the pros outweigh the cons. The benefits are as follows: >>>More

9 answers2024-06-12

The main stimulant contained in coffee is caffeine. In addition, it contains fats and minerals such as magnesium, potassium, and copper, as well as B vitamins, aromas, and toxins. That said, coffee doesn't have any nutritional value, but it has many pros and cons on the body due to the effects of caffeine. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-12

That's what the pundits say, and I hope you understand.

1 Necessity. This is the era of the knowledge economy, and information is expanding at an unprecedented rate and. >>>More

17 answers2024-06-12

No, if you play games for a long time, your academic performance will decline, your eyes will be short-sighted, you will be left behind by the learning progress in the class, and you will be poor in learning, and if you don't study, it will be more difficult and difficult to enter the society. So games are harmful, and I don't think elementary school students should play with their phones.

1 answers2024-06-12

That's what the pundits say, and I hope you understand.

1 Necessity. This is the era of the knowledge economy, and information is expanding at an unprecedented rate and. >>>More