Do grass eating animals have a lower IQ than meat eating animals?

Yes. Because meat-eating animals need to constantly seek and hunt for food, while herbivorous animals don't have to think about it so much, meat-eating animals have a higher IQ than grass-eating animals.

There is no rigorous data to prove that grazing-eating animals have lower IQs than meat-eating animals. This aspect is not rigorous. Because there are also carnivores with low IQ, and there are also animals that eat grass with high IQ.

There is no scientific proof, or more professional investigation to show that the IQ of grass-eating animals is lower than that of meat-eating, but the appearance of grass-eating animals will be softer, and meat-eating animals will be more fierce and huge, humans are herbivores, and they are also carnivores, but human IQ is the first of all things, so you can't judge the level of IQ by eating grass or meat.

Because carnivores lack cellulase to digest plants, carnivores basically do not eat grass, while herbivores with digestible plant fibers can also eat grass and meat. As for animals, we are always curious about the fact that there are always starving carnivores on the savannah, how can there be so much grass and starve to death? The reason is actually very simple, carnivores basically do not eat grass!

Herbivores, on the other hand, can eat both grass and meat, but not too much.

1. Because carnivores lack cellulase, they would rather starve to death than eat grass because they cannot digest grass

The animal world is a very special world, and there are many biological laws that are difficult for us to understand. The most special thing is that in the carnivore world, everyone doesn't even eat grass! After watching many grassland documentaries, you will find that those carnivorous babies will not touch the grass in the prairie even if they starve to death, is it because the grass is poisonous?

No, it's that they lack cellulase and can't digest grasses, and they will bite and play with grass but refuse to swallow it at all, which is in stark contrast to herbivores.

2. Herbivores with cellulase, they can digest a variety of foods and eat meat naturally

So why do herbivores eat meat? Quite simply, it is also the cause of cellulase. Since herbivores themselves have cellulase enzymes that can digest more food, and for meat, they are also small but not too much, at least they will not consume too much; In fact, herbivores can't consume a lot of meat, after all, the digestive system also has a certain impact, but they are willing to accept meat and herbivore, and carnivorous things are innate, and grass is inedible, and naturally they don't want to touch it, just as a toy.

Carnivores lack cellulase and are completely reluctant to touch grass for fear of diarrhea and other problems, while herbivores can eat meat in moderation.

Why do humans eat only herbivores and almost no carnivores? You'll understand after reading it.

Hello, this depends on the corresponding animal his own internal digestion problem, herbivores eat meat, carnivores eat grass is no problem, but herbivores have poor digestive system ability to digest meat, and carnivores many do not have cellulase, can not digest grass fiber so do not eat much.

Herbivores can also eat meat, but carnivores rarely eat grass, so that the food chain cycle is formed, which is in line with the melody of life in nature, and nature can develop well.

Herbivores can eat meat occasionally, but carnivores rarely eat grass, because they don't want to eat grass because they have eaten the deliciousness of meat, and these plants don't taste sweet anymore.

No, there is no basis for this claim, because the most intelligent in nature are omnivores, followed by herbivores, and finally carnivores, which is the result of the different directions that animals choose when they evolve.

Not all, because some herbivores are more intelligent than carnivores. There is no scientific basis for this.

Yes. Because meat is rich in protein, it can promote brain development and improve memory.

The IQ of animals is generally calculated in terms of brain capacity, and the intake of meat protein can indeed promote the development of the brain, and because of the need for predation, generally speaking, in an average sense, the intelligence of carnivores is always higher than that of carnivores, after all, it is necessary to be more intelligent to catch food, and carnivores that cannot catch prey will only be eliminated.

Therefore, in a general sense, the most intelligent animals are basically carnivores or omnivores, such as dolphins are carnivores, while chimpanzees are omnivores.

However, this comparison is only an overall one, and if it is specific to a specific animal, this answer is not necessarily, so it cannot be said that herbivores have a lower IQ than carnivores.

Among herbivores, the representative of intelligence is the elephant, which is a herbivore and is also the largest animal on land. Elephants live a long lifespan, and as they grow, such as during droughts, the leader of the herd often needs to lead the herd to distant drinking spots. Elephants have excellent memories and can even remember events from decades ago.

Moreover, elephants are one of the few animals that have self-awareness, and according to the research of scientists, elephants can obtain bananas by cooperating with each other when encountering problems, and the wisdom of elephants can also be ranked among all animals.

And among the carnivores, of course, there are also some head irons, such as the flat-headed honey badger, which is known for its bravery and fearlessness. And in many cases, bravery can also be seen as synonymous with recklessness, which is likely to be met with a strong blow from the enemy. Therefore, among carnivores, there are not no species with low IQ.

Or it could be said that most carnivores have no more IQ than elephants. So on the whole, although carnivores still have a stronger IQ than herbivores, they cannot be described in terms of all, and any absolute description is inaccurate. It's like black people have a certain advantage in track and field, but it doesn't mean that black people will necessarily win over yellow and white people in track and field, and there is a difference between the individual and the universal.

There is a scientific basis, because they are carnivores, they take in more nutrients and can accelerate brain development, while herbivores have a single nutrition, so the IQ of herbivores is generally very low.

There is no scientific basis for this, but this is the way it is a common phenomenon, and it is in line with the conjectures of evolution.

No, the IQ of animals has nothing to do with eating habits, but with their brain capacity.