What management philosophies can be analysed from the eagle catching the chicken?

I thought that the eagle catching the chick was a sign of team spirit. Only by working together as a team can we avoid the eagle's mistakes. Of course, in a team, there must be a head and a tail.

If the one on the head has the strongest defense, then the last one must be the weakest. So it's generally the one who is tied to the left back.

The reason why the eagle can fight in the sky is because it has the ambition to fight in the sky. As shown in the figure, the blue horizontal line is equivalent to "survival" and the black horizontal line is equivalent to "death". The chicken takes "survival" as the upper line, the blue arrow indicates the range of the chicken, and the chicken can only survive above the blue horizontal line, so the chicken's chance of survival is 1, and the chance of death is (-1).

The eagle takes "survival" as the bottom line, the red arrow indicates the range of the eagle, and the eagle will only die below the blue horizontal line, so the eagle's survival probability is (-1) and the death probability is 1.

The chick in the eagle catches the chick makes me understand that many entrepreneurs are insensitive to some new things or hidden business opportunities, or have a wait-and-see attitude, and when others make a fortune, they begin to imitate desperately, and the result is terrible. Rockefeller once said: If you want to succeed, you should move forward on a new path, not follow the road of success that has been trampled on.

Either follow the first new thing as soon as it comes out, or you don't follow it, and the later you follow, the greater the risk.

In the game of "Eagle Catches Chicken", which chicken is caught first? The answer is obviously the last chick. Although it was the furthest from the eagle, it was the first to be caught.

Because the last chick is the slowest to react, the last to follow, and the range of running is quite large, so it is even more exhausted. We have a terrible saying, "Imitation is learning." The same is true for enterprises, the company that imitates the latest is the last chick, because the market is occupied by the pioneer early, so his products can only be sold farther, the higher the cost, and the last chick also has the largest running radius.

Therefore, many business operators often say that "take your time, and we will not be too late to act when everyone has done it", and "everyone has done this, so we have to do it" is very wrong. To do business, you must compete for saliva; Those who follow late, do a lot of work, and have a large range will die earlier.

What kind of behavior leads to what kind of results. The same goes for the game of "Eagle Catches Chicken". In the game of "Eagle Catches Chick", the hen always regards "as long as she can live, as long as she can live, as long as possible" as the highest goal, and thinks that only she is the most capable, and the chick is weak, therefore, to act as the chicken's umbrella and savior, so its behavior is destined to:

Destined to survive, committed to protection, passive in behavior, tired in care. The end result of this behavior is that it is useless. Therefore, the tragedy of the hen lies entirely in itself.

In fact, chicks can also defeat eagles. If each chick does not blindly follow, but gives full play to their own enthusiasm, initiative and their own advantages, and goes their own way, there will definitely be chicks who escape the "claws" of the eagle and grow into a big chicken, and the big chicken gives birth to a chick, and the chick participates in the war and grows into a big chicken, and finally the eagle can be defeated. Victory or defeat has nothing to do with whether it is an eagle or a chicken, it all depends on the attitude of both.

It's not about whether it's an eagle today, it's about whether it has the genes of an eagle. The eagle defeated the chicken because of innovation; The chickens eventually failed because of imitation. Ultimately determining victory or defeat is whether he chooses to innovate or imitate.

Chicks are strictly required to follow the hen, they are dragged by the hen, and they all have only one idea: to seek the protection of the hen and follow the hen closely. Therefore, the chick's behavior must be:

Destined to evade, committed to following. This practice makes the chick exhausted, and the failure is obvious. The Eagle, on the other hand, is determined to win, to break the rules, and to act on the initiative.

So, the success of the Eagles is a matter of time.

Why do the chicks end up being caught by the eagles? We found that no matter who played the role of eagle or chick, the result was the same. This tells us:

In the game of eagle and chicken, it is not who is the chicken or the eagle who determines the victory, but the attitude of each party towards the rules. Whoever plays the eagle will be a winner, and whoever plays either a hen or a chick will be a loser. From a certain point of view, winning or losing all depends on the system, that is, the rules.