Can retirees from transformed scientific research institutes also enjoy living subsidies from public

Updated on society 2024-06-21
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    After the transformation, if it is a difference in the amount of funds or a self-supporting and self-collecting institution, it should be given.

    Ji Renlian [2007] No. 6 document "Opinions on the Issuance of New Performance Salary Quota for In-service Personnel of Provincial Institutions and New Living Allowance for Retirees" clearly stipulates that "the implementation scope of the new performance salary quota for in-service personnel and the new living allowance for retirees shall be the provincial and long-term public institutions". In the document "Opinions on the Issuance of New Performance Salary Quota and New Living Allowance for Retirees of In-service Personnel of Provincial Public Institutions" [2007] No. 6, it is classified and explained how to issue living subsidies to retirees of institutions with full withdrawal, institutions with balance withdrawal, and self-supporting and self-income institutions.

    We know that the retirees of self-supporting and self-supporting institutions are all insured, if the policy does not give them living allowances, then it is necessary to explain how to pay them living subsidies in the document?

    China has entered an aging society, the number of retirees is huge, and the country's financial burden is very heavy. With the rapid development of social economy, the pension of retired workers is relatively lagging behind, for example, 1000 yuan in 1998 and 1000 yuan in 2008, it is definitely two different concepts, 1000 yuan pension in 1998, after several adjustments, it rose to 1300 yuan in 2008, and the standard of living can only be said to maintain the original level at most, which is a longitudinal analysis. In a horizontal comparison, with the economic development and the rise of the price index, the wages of workers and workers have continued to grow, and the wages of workers who have just worked for a short time are more than 2,000 yuan, while the retirement allowance of many retired workers who have worked all their lives is only more than 1,000 yuan and less than 2,000 yuan, and the actual living standards of retired workers have declined relatively.

    The state has seen this as well. At present, the pilot reform of the pension insurance system of public institutions is being carried out, and the main reform contents of the "Pilot Program for the Reform of the Pension Insurance System for Employees of Public Institutions" are: Employees of public institutions must not only participate in the basic pension insurance, but also implement the occupational pension system (supplementary pension insurance).

    The spirit is that participating in the basic old-age insurance can guarantee the basic life, and the implementation of the occupational pension system can improve the living standard, enjoy the fruits of the country's economic development, and prevent the living standard from falling sharply after retirement. It's all in the pilot. So, before the establishment of the pension insurance system of public institutions, that is, now, what is the national policy?

    The state's policy is: "Before the establishment of the pension insurance system of public institutions, while adjusting the wage standards of in-service employees, retirees shall increase appropriate retirement allowances." (Excerpted from the Ministry of People's Affairs [2006] No. 60 "Implementation Measures on Issues Concerning the Calculation and Payment of Retirement Allowances for Retired Personnel of Government Institutions and Institutions") Therefore, when in-service employees add performance wages, living allowances are paid to retired employees.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    You can't enjoy the living allowance you are talking about, it means performance pay.

    Performance-based pay is not for retirees.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    3000 8000, senior comprehensive salary in above!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Yes, in general, large state-owned enterprises have scientific research institutes under them, but they are not public institutions that belong to state organs, but belong to the establishment of public institutions within enterprises.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    It should not be a public institution or an enterprise.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    As long as you meet the requirements of a science and engineering bachelor's degree and have two years of work experience, of course, you can.

    There is no law that restricts them from applying for the exam.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    You can apply, as long as it's science and engineering.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    You can apply for the exam, provided you have a science and engineering degree and two years of work experience.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    It doesn't belong.

    1. Public institutions refer to social service organizations organized by state organs or other organizations using state-owned assets for the purpose of social welfare, and engaged in education, science and technology, culture, health and other activities. A scientific research institution refers to an institution that has a clear research direction and tasks, and is engaged in long-term and organized research and development activities by academic leaders of a certain level and a certain number and quality of researchers. The U.S. National Research Institute is a scientific research institution established by the first grant to serve the country.

    2. Most colleges and universities in the United States are private schools, such as MIT, Harvard University, Yale University, etc., all of which are private universities.

    3. China's public institutions are non-profit organizations or non-profit organizations corresponding to those in the United States, and these organizations in the United States are all social autonomous organizations and have no plans.

Related questions