The criterion of good and evil is a matter of motive in Example 20

Agree: Zhongfeng Cloud. Everything is not cleansed. The eyes are not open. Recognize good as evil. Refers to evil as good. Often, there is.

Ordinary people are ordinary people with the naked eye, his vulgarity, his heart is not clean, but there are still a lot of delusions and attachments, no discernment, and he can't see the truth. Recognizing good as evil means that evil is good, and good and evil are reversed, which is called confusion and reversal. Often, there are not only such people in the world, but there are many of them.

The Zen master is polite, don't say a lot, just say that there are such people.

2.Mahayana: It is to know that people are good, regardless of the current situation, and talk about the evil; Whether it's a moment, it's a long time; No matter one, but the world.

You look at the great sages and sages, and they have a far-sighted vision and a deep vision. Ordinary people have a shallow eye, only looking at the present, and do not know the impact of his actions on future generations. We want to contribute to the whole society, the country, and even to.

The criterion for judging good and evil should be motivation.

For example, if a good person does a bad deed, it cannot be said that the person is evil, but only that he is dull. Good and evil are the embodiment of people's inner morality, and they cannot be treated with good just because a person wears a mask of hypocrisy, nor can a person's reckless behavior deny their kind and simple nature, after all, few people can really have a tiger in their hearts to sniff roses.

The law is used to measure what kind of behavior is harmful to society and others, rather than absolute good and evil, and punishment such as manslaughter is to punish the evil consequences of his mistakes, not to deny his good intentions.

The meaning of kindness:

The meaning of kindness is not trivial, the role of kindness is incomparably huge, kindness is the magic weapon of human beings in all things in nature, and it is the secret of dominating the whole earth.

Kindness is to keep the pure land in your heart, no matter how the world changes, you can pat your chest and say that you are worthy of heaven and earth. The vast majority of children who are just sensible hope that they will become a good person, and their original intentions are very good, and not everyone can do it if they keep their original intentions. Many people end up being the people they hated the most when they were children.

Kindness is a kind of faith, everyone has their own sunny side and dark side, if you choose the dark side, you can only bring immediate benefits, why not be a sincere person, do not have to be entangled in good and evil every day, simply, become your own true favorite yourself.

First, the criterion for judging good and evil should be whether the outcome of a behavior is beneficial or not to the mainstream thinking of the current society.

It is undeniable that all definitions are given by people, and the reason why "cat" is "cat" and "dog" is "dog" are all artificially prescribed, and no one asks why "cat" is called "cat" and "dog" is called "dog", we just see the results of "cat" and "dog".

At the same time, good and evil are actually the same, they are all a judgment of the result, you may say that in the law, the sentence of accidental injury and intentional injury is different, indeed, in reality, many things are divided into intentional and unintentional situations, but the fact of hurting people is irrevocable, and in very special circumstances, it will only reduce the sentence rather than exempt the sentence, and the same is to receive punishment.

The families and lives of both the victim and the actor will be affected by this incident, and there will be no unintentional regression in time, and there will be no unintentional recovery in life. The results are indelible.

Therefore, we believe that the criterion for judging good and evil is the result.

After thinking deeply about it for a long time, I realized that this contradiction should not exist.

The education we received from a young age in Na Shed is the result of the standard for judging good and evil. From Mencius: "A gentleman is not more than being kind to others."

To Shakespeare: "The difference between good and evil lies in the behavior of the wheel of the cave itself", from "Zhou Yi" "good does not accumulate enough to become famous, evil does not accumulate enough to destroy the body" to Chai Jing's "There are no good people and bad people in this world, only people who have done good things and people who have done bad things." ”

To be continued (TBD.)

Categories: Social livelihood sail do.

Problem description: We are the result.

Please provide information or defence.

Analysis: Is the criterion for evaluating good and evil behavior motives? Or is it an effect?

Zhang Wan, a student from the 00-level economic and trade team of Zhengfang, took the lead and made a rigorous argument, proposing: "The criterion for evaluating the good and evil of behavior is the effect, and the balance is not the motive." Citing works such as "Introduction to Ethics" and "Theoretical Foundations of Behavioral Science", he pointed out:

1) Good and evil are measured in the realm of morality, not by legal standards. The so-called "goodness" is the beneficial behavior to others and society that is manifested in the relationship between people and people; "Evil" is an act that is harmful to others and society. It can be seen from the quotation that the "beneficial" and "harmful" mentioned in the article are undoubtedly judged by the effect of the behavior.

Whereas, "motivation" is a subjective state with implicit characteristics, and motivation always needs to be expressed through behavior. It can be seen that motivation alone cannot evaluate behavior at all. (2) From the perspective of behavior management, the same motive can cause a variety of different behaviors.

For example, when you want to get a video camera, this motivation can lead to the following behaviors: first, work hard, get more salary, and save money to buy it; Second, save money to buy money.

It can be seen that both of these actions can be said to be good in terms of reason and reason; However, if you want to rely on crooked ways and use ill-gotten gains to buy, this kind of behavior is undoubtedly evil. Both good and evil behaviors are caused by the same motive, and if the effect is not produced by the behavior, how can the good or evil of the behavior be evaluated by relying on the motive alone? (3) Reasonable motives may also lead to unreasonable or even wrong behavior.

For example, parents "stick education" children, from the parents' motivation, undoubtedly want their children to become talents, is a good motive, is a good motive.

The outer world comes from the projection of the inner world, and what you believe, you will create.

Recently, I was reading Mr. Kazuo Inamori's book "Heart". As we all know, he is the "saint of management" in the corporate world all over the world, as long as he is willing to do something, as long as he does it, he basically succeeds.

He founded Kyocera and KDDI, two of the world's top 500 companies, and at the age of 78, he took over the bankrupt JAL and turned it around.

He has done so much, but if you ask him how to do it, he will say: before doing anything, he will ask himself, what is the point of doing this? Is it in good faith?

Needless to say, he has always adhered to this belief that he will only do it with good intentions, and as long as he does it, he will do it successfully.

He has six principles of refinement, namely:

1. Pay no less than anyone's efforts;

2. Be humble, don't be proud;

3. Reflect every day;

4. To live, you have to thank the coarse paulownia;

5. Accumulate good deeds and think altruism;

6. Don't have emotional worries.

The motive of good intentions is also reflected in the fifth point. To be honest, for us ordinary people, it is actually quite difficult to always think about altruism in everything, and our current state is at best to be ourselves, and it is already very good not to cause trouble for others. I think altruism can only be achieved after you have reached a certain height, such as after achieving financial freedom.

I remember reading the autobiography of Mr. Kazuo Inamori before, and he said that at the beginning of the business, I was thinking about how to realize my technical feelings, and then slowly, I was thinking about how to let employees get the double happiness of spiritual and material levels, and then later, I was thinking about how to repay the society.

So for us ordinary people, I think what we can do at the moment is to take our work seriously, do whatever we have to do, and try not to trouble others as much as possible and help others as much as we can before making our own foundation.

I think that if you can do this, it is enough, and then when you have a certain economic foundation, when you do anything, you can think about whether it is beneficial to others and whether it is out of good intentions.

On the other hand, doing things that are recognized by the public is also a kind of mutual benefit and win-win situation. As long as you do the extreme, you will definitely have unexpected harvests, which for yourself, can be described as a material and spiritual double harvest, why not?

Try to cultivate yourself, slowly work from the outside in, and eventually meet your true self.

First of all, from the point of view of the criterion for distinguishing good and evil behavior, the theory is discussed.

Tell us that all behaviors that are conducive to social progress are good deeds, and vice versa, which is itself a result judgment, then there is no doubt that the result is the standard for evaluating the good and evil behaviors. Second, from the essential difference between outcome and motivation, we know that the outcome is certain. When the motivation is inconsistent with the subjective intention of the actor, it has deviated from the object of our evaluation - behavior, so how can the motivation be used as a standard at this time?

And when it is consistent with the actor's intention to act, the motive still cannot be used as a criterion for evaluation. Because there are many objective constraints from motives to behaviors, there are behaviors of both good and evil natures due to different practices for the same motive, just as we often see that good intentions do bad things, and bad intentions do good things. So it turns out that the results can be used as the criterion for evaluation.

Thirdly, from the perspective of the plurality of results, we say that the results are not singular, the results are like a bunch of grapes, and each grape is its constituent element. Just like the social effect of the behavior, the degree of harm to others, and so on, are all elements that constitute this result.

Today, we combine these elements to analyze behavior comprehensively. In order to give it an objective, fair and rational evaluation. So to sum up, I think that the criterion for evaluating good and evil behavior is the result.

Good and evil lie in actions and results, because only you give actions for your own thoughts, whether good or evil, look at the results. A bad person has done bad things all his life, and when he is old, he wants to understand that I want to do good deeds, which is great good, and a good person has done good things all his life, and when he is old, he has done a bad thing, which is great evil. There is an old saying that "it is better to marry a good prostitute than to marry a wife who has crossed the wall".

Motivation, such as helping the elderly, and then dislocating the old man's arm due to your mistake, is definitely good.

Another example is that you cut people unconscious, because of this result, the person did not go home, and it happened that he was ** in his house, so he did not die, he must be evil!