In that era of the Three Kingdoms, did everyone say that they were obedient?

Updated on history 2024-06-06
42 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Of course, there is, why not, of course, it is not what we call Mandarin today, but in ancient times, there was also a lingua franca, and what we usually call "official language" is not it.

    The so-called Yayan Zhengyin In ancient times, educated people would say yes, otherwise, if you meet a buddy from Wu Di or Baiyue, you know what he is talking about, so there is a ghost.

    In fact, the so-called dialects, which are now used by a small number of dialects, such as Wu, Yue, Fujian, Hunan, Jiangxi, Hakka, and so on, are also spoken in other regions, including some of the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, and the so-called "Xiajiang Mandarin" means that you can understand it, right?

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It's definitely not Mandarin... Because Putonghua is a unified language implemented after the founding of the People's Republic of China, Beijing dialect is the standard.

    According to the cultural center, it should still be the language of Chang'an, the western capital, and Luoyang, the Central Plains.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    There can't be, Mandarin has only begun to be popularized in modern times, and it should be the language of Chang'an, the western capital, and Luoyang in the Central Plains.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    At that time, there was no Mandarin, it seems that Kong Ming is still from Shandong, Zhuge Liang, who speaks Shandong. . . Guan Yu, who speaks Shanxi... Hehe!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    There can't be, and they haven't all spoken Mandarin yet

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Definitely not, it should be a dialect.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    It's certainly not Mandarin, which has only become popular in modern times.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The text is not very deep, and the words are not very vulgar.

    From the preface written by Jiang Daqi in the Ming Dynasty for Luo Guanzhong's "Popular Romance of the Three Kingdoms": "If Dongyuan Luo Guanzhong uses Pingyang Chen Shou's "Biography" to examine the history of the country, since the first year of Emperor Zhongping of the Han Dynasty, and finally the first year of Jin Taikang, pay attention to the profit and loss, and the eyes are called "The Popular Romance of the Three Kingdoms". The text is not very deep, the words are not very vulgar, the chronicle is actually almost history. ”

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Definitely not, history is developing!

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    There should be an official language in which we can communicate with each other.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    220 Cao Pi called the emperor 280 destroyed Wu.

    Jia Chong (217 282), the founding father of the Western Jin Dynasty, contributed a lot to the founding of Wei in the Western Jin Dynasty.

    Wang Jun (206-286), a famous general in the Western Jin Dynasty of China, who commanded the campaign to destroy Wu should have many more but if you count it from adulthood, there are none of them The closest are Liao Hua, Xin Xianying, and Liu Chan.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    I've been looking for a long time, but I can't seem to find it, there is a Sima Fu, 180 272, it's only 8 years away, and I can't find the rest.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Zuo Ci! History records that this man lived from 156 to 289 years!

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    Chen Shou, he counts himself as a handful.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Because of the Three Kingdoms. It was because of the decline of the imperial court, Sun Quan, Cao Cao, and Liu Bei occupied the most powerful land, and they were all Han Chinese. And they all successively called the emperor, Shu, Wei, and Wu, so they were called the Three Kingdoms.

    This is a historically specific phrase that can no longer be repeated. It may also be called the Three Kingdoms because of the appearance of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" and "Romance of the Three Kingdoms".

    To repeat it is to say that this is a historically specific term that can no longer be repeated.

    The Song Dynasty was also divided into the Southern Song Dynasty and the Northern Song Dynasty. The Han Dynasty was the Eastern Han Dynasty and the Western Han Dynasty. The Jin Dynasty was in the Eastern Jin Dynasty and the Western Jin Dynasty. It's the same thing.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The situation of the Three Kingdoms is quite grim, and it is so large-scale.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Let me give you the correct answer, why do I refer to the Three Kingdoms specifically referring to Cao Cao's era?

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Because the historical theme ** "Three Kingdoms" and the four famous works that evolved later ** "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" made that era famous at home and abroad, so most people know that the Three Kingdoms refer to the three kingdoms of Wei, Shu and Wu. The Three Kingdoms we are talking about, according to the recognition of most people who stick to the old rules, only refer to Cao Cao's era!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    They all called emperors, and they had their own regimes, hence the name of the Three Kingdoms.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    At that time, the most famous, and there was "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", one of the four famous books, the book propaganda, knowing that there were many Three Kingdoms in Cao Cao's era, naturally, as time went by, most people mistakenly thought that the Three Kingdoms specifically referred to Cao Cao's era.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    My personal opinion is that because these three countries are all Han nations, and there are three parties, it is the future people who are willing to recognize the three countries at the same time, and call them countries together. In ancient China, the Han national regime was orthodox, so the Song Dynasty was the right, not a few countries. The Yuan and Qing dynasties were unified regimes, so even if they were ruled by ethnic minorities, they had to be orthodox.

    Of course, in today's society, all ethnic groups are equal, and there is no orthodox unity. I only speculated from the perspective of ancient people's thoughts, and there was no national prejudice.

    The above views are purely my own opinions, and I don't know whether they are right or not.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Although the Northern Song Dynasty coexisted with the Liao and Western Xia, neither the Liao nor the Western Xia were held by the Han Chinese, so the Song Dynasty was the main line in history.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The Three Kingdoms of Cao Cao's era were the most famous.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    During the Three Kingdoms period, on the surface, it was just a process of dynastic change, but in fact it was not. The struggle between the races is brutal, with a direction and outcome that does not depend on human will, such as the thousand-year-old dispute between the Han Chinese and the nomads. In that kind of struggle, the will and wisdom of the individual are insignificant, and the thirty years in Hedong and thirty years in Hexi are the laws of history.

    And the struggle within the race, specifically in the Three Kingdoms period, if you put yourself in that environment, there can be n kinds of endings, and it is a key turning point, which can be influenced by the will of man. "What kind of prince will Xiangning have? "This applies to the power struggles within races.

    The characters of the Three Kingdoms each had the opportunity to rewrite history on their own, and they all sought to take advantage of such an opportunity, which was rare in other dynasties, and the wisdom and character of the people shone brightly. At other times, even if you win the world, others will say that you should win, but the world is an era that goes against the sky, no wonder there are many talents.

    Of course, such turning points are extremely rare, and they come at a high cost: the population is declining, the state is weakened, the economy is almost devastating, and the cultural development has regressed for hundreds of years, but China has not experienced the same dark ages as the European Middle Ages, when the ethics and weather on which everyone depends have lost their power, the state collapses, and the people's livelihood withers, and the key to the survival of the nation lies with the survivors, and they are heroes

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    The convention refers specifically to that era, because in that era, the three countries were almost evenly matched, and whoever was stronger was slightly stronger, forming a stable triangular institution, which was the most representative.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    The reasons are: the history book - "Three Kingdoms"; Chapter back** - "Romance of the Three Kingdoms". The former is well known to scholars and experts; The latter is well known to the poor people. The subtle result is that the Three Kingdoms, Wei Shu and Wu Ye.

  27. Anonymous users2024-01-16

    In fact, it is because Chen Shou wrote "Three Kingdoms" that people have the concept of the Three Kingdoms. Before 220 AD, it was the Eastern Han Dynasty, and after 220 years, it was the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties.

  28. Anonymous users2024-01-15

    Because there were a lot of talented people at that time, and no one was going to write about the other three countries.

    So as the days went on, it became like this.

  29. Anonymous users2024-01-14

    Three Kingdoms is just a specific name, because the ancients set him with this name.

  30. Anonymous users2024-01-13

    On the one hand, the convention is that that period had a huge impact on the historical development of our country, far exceeding the other periods of coexistence of the three kingdoms, such as the Song, Jin, and Western Xia periods, when the development of the three countries was uneven, so it is not called so.

  31. Anonymous users2024-01-12

    This is a historical term, there are three kingdoms in history, the first is, the three kingdoms of Wei, Shu and Wu, and then the three kingdoms of the Western Jin Dynasty, Shu and Wu, and then the confrontation between the Western Wei, Eastern Wei and Liang during the Northern and Southern Dynasties. In the later period, the three kingdoms of Qi, Zhou, and Chen confronted each other. Since then, there have been confrontations between Western Xia, Song, and Liao (Jin).

    In foreign countries, there was a period of confrontation between the three countries on the Korean Peninsula.

    Why is it called the Three Kingdoms refers specifically to the Cao Cao era, which may also have a lot to do with the Three Kingdoms written by Chen Shou. In short, the Three Kingdoms have become synonymous with a particular history.

    Of course, the Three Kingdoms does not refer only to Wei, Shu and Wu, but also includes part of the Western Jin Dynasty.

  32. Anonymous users2024-01-11

    The three-legged tripod has seen it, they all have strength, and they all have the potential to be kings.

  33. Anonymous users2024-01-10

    I remember watching "Beauty Scheming", and they all said "no" ......

  34. Anonymous users2024-01-09

    What kind of beauty scheming has been put in Zhangjiagang and Taiwan recently It also says "no".

  35. Anonymous users2024-01-08

    Stop yelling, what should you do. 2012 is almost here, just be happy.

  36. Anonymous users2024-01-07

    pp sells yy.,On the other hand, come to D post.。。。

  37. Anonymous users2024-01-06

    Zhuge Liang in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms was added a lot of fame by Mr. Luo Guanzhong, for example, in reality, there was no Bo Wangpo, and I didn't like him more First: After the death of the first master, he monopolized the power and set up the latter master, so that the Shu Kingdom was basically controlled by Zhuge Liang, which caused the latter to be weak and incompetent and unable to deal with the affairs of his own country Second: I don't know how to distribute talents, in the battle of the street pavilion, I appointed my apprentice Ma Tan, although Ma Tan is self-recommended, but as a commander, I should know how to distinguish between right and wrong, but I should send a mediocre person to such an important position in the street pavilion, and I really shouldn't third:

    Not responsible, the first lord invited him out of the mountain, that is, he wanted him to serve Shu, but during his reign, he didn't even dig out a decent talent, and Zilong and Han Shengnian had to go into battle to kill the enemy when they were more than half a hundred, and finally got no general in Shu, and Liao Hua was the vanguard Fourth: As long as he identifies a bad person, he will definitely not listen to his opinions, such as Wei Yan's suggestion to attack Chang'an directly, I think Zhuge Liang's worries at that time were superfluous, because at that time there was only Sima Yi who threatened him, and this person was suspended at that time, And he didn't listen to Wei Yan's advice, the most important thing was that he didn't like this person, I think more than half of the reason why Wei Yan betrayed Shu came from Zhuge Liang This is purely a personal opinion.

  38. Anonymous users2024-01-05

    Just a few words! In fact, in contrast, Liu Bei followed Liu Bang's old path, and Zhuge Liang's advice to him was also in accordance with Liu Bang's routine, but compared to the end of Qin (at that time, Xianyang was the master, and it was Liu Bang who took the lead), it was Cao Mengde who coerced the Son of Heaven to order the princes, putting aside some factors of scheming and luck, which at least shows that Liu Bei is inferior to Liu Bang in terms of innate strength; On the opponent, although Xiang Yu can be belligerent, he is stubborn and self-serving, and he has failed to grasp several opportunities to make future generations sigh, and Cao Mengde's "Zhou Gong spit and feed, the world returns to the heart" The two personalities are not one or two points. Erliu is not outstanding in terms of ability, how can it be said that there are no variables in the face of stronger opponents?

    Let's talk about the talents under him, compared with Liu Bang, it is true that Liu Bei has countless fierce generals, but Wei Wu is also talented; Zhuge Kongming is often compared with Zhang Zifang in the 600-year-old Xinghan Dynasty, but after the establishment of the Shu Han Dynasty, it cannot be compared with Zhang Zifang.

    So I think it's difficult to follow Zhuge Liang's script even if Liu Bang is changed, and history can't tolerate assumptions, just complain, haha!

  39. Anonymous users2024-01-04

    The Three Kingdoms returned to Jin, and Liu Bang did not unify the world.

  40. Anonymous users2024-01-03

    Hello landlord:

    It is true that each dynasty has many outstanding figures and wonderful wars, but the history books written by the "people who record history" of each dynasty are simply boring for modern people. And **"Romance of the Three Kingdoms", one of the four famous masterpieces, interprets the history of the Three Kingdoms very wonderfully, and interprets the character of each character. Moreover, the history is narrated in a "continuous story" that is easily acceptable, and the way of recording the biographies in the history books has been changed...

    But romance is romance after all, and there are many differences from the official history... And because of its special significance of the times, and indeed wonderful events, the Three Kingdoms have won the love of many people. It also makes many people mistakenly think that only the Three Kingdoms period has such a wonderful plot...

    If you carefully study the history, in fact, every piece of history is amazing, we should not only look at history in the "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" window, the real history should be explored by ourselves little by little...

    Maintaining the History of the Three Kingdoms 2013 1 18 will answer for you.

  41. Anonymous users2024-01-02

    To put it simply, this is called the charm of literature, there are many heroes in the Sui and Tang Dynasties, and there are many masters in the Ming Dynasty, but they are not masterpieces.

  42. Anonymous users2024-01-01

    Because the history of the Three Kingdoms at the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty is recognized as the most chaotic dynasty in Chinese history, the large and small warlords are divided, and the people are not able to make a living, it can be said that throughout the history of China, the more troubled the era, the more heroic and heroic eras, there are no less than 100 well-known historical figures in the Three Kingdoms, which is difficult to compare with other eras.

Related questions
12 answers2024-06-06

Three Kingdoms kills new characters with technical capabilities.

8 answers2024-06-06

Even if you don't add small people, there are not a few people I suggest you go to the Internet to check a lot of them are also very comprehensive You should be everyone's table I remember the last time I checked the Han Xian Emperor Liu Xie And some people don't have a table such as Dian Wei Guan Ping and the like.

9 answers2024-06-06

Liu Bei: Benevolence] to serve people with virtue Meritocracy, can obey people. >>>More

3 answers2024-06-06

The 1st to 2nd episodes include Liu Bei, Guan Yu, Zhang Fei, Zhang Jiao, Zhang Bao, Zhang Liang, He Jin, Sun Jian, Huangfu Song, Zhu Jun, Lu Zhi, Cao Cao, Gongsun Zhan, Dong Zhuo, and Du Post. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-06

Hua Tuo's medical book is a green capsule book, right? The treatise on typhoid fever and miscellaneous diseases seems to have been written by Zhang Zhongjing. But they seem to be the same generation, and the treatise on typhoid fever and miscellaneous diseases was written in 200-210, probably at the time of the Battle of Guandu.