After the death of Dr. Hanmen, another master fell from the building, who will regulate the behavior

Xi'an Jiaotong University responded to a report that Zhou Yun, Yang Baode's doctoral supervisor, did have behaviors such as asking students to clean up at home, accompany supermarket shopping, and wash cars. The university has seriously criticized and educated Zhou Yun, and the university's degree evaluation committee has cancelled Zhou Yun's graduate enrollment qualification.

According to Yang Baode's chat records with his doctoral supervisor and his classmates' relatives and friends, Yang Baode was often asked by his supervisor to help with personal chores before his death.

The unexpected death of Yang Baode deeply regretted the school and the tutor. During the period when he was missing, the school organized teachers and students to go to the railway station, Qinling Mountain and other places to search for him in conjunction with his family for many days, and released information in Huashang Daily, Xi'an Traffic Broadcasting, Xi'an TV Station, etc., published a missing person notice, and assisted his family to access surveillance videos in many areas of Xi'an.

First of all, I personally think that BAI must still have a strict selection system for graduate supervisors. Of course, this is just the point of view, because according to my personal understanding, it is very simple for a university teacher to be a graduate tutor, as long as the research results are enough, the professional title is enough, you can take graduate students, most schools are like this, and there is no system.

1. Strict selection system, including when I was studying before, it is relatively simple for teachers in our school to take graduate students, teachers can apply, as long as your graduate achievements are enough, you can generally take graduate students, sometimes the title is not enough, and you can make exceptions. Therefore, I personally think that the selection system of graduate supervisors should be strictly enforced, so that those unqualified teachers have no way to lead graduate students.

Secondly, graduate students commit suicide not only at home but also abroad, so the most important thing about the supervisor's behavior is "self-restraint". In fact, whether the tutor is good or not, whether he is qualified or not mainly depends on the tutor's own character, there are garbage tutors at home and abroad, I have seen some tutors without teacher ethics in the news, many students unfortunately become graduate students of such teachers, and if they get through it, they will be miserable.

I've seen a lot of news examples, and usually the behavior of these tutors who don't have teacher ethics is not illegal, so it is very difficult for students to protect their rights and interests. If the student can't help but commit suicide, there is no way to hold these teachers accountable, at most it is to suspend the recruitment of graduate students for a few years, that is to say, the tutor has many behaviors that are not illegal but can cause harm to students, this kind of behavior mainly requires the teacher to self-restraint, do not let himself become a garbage tutor with no teacher ethics and no bottom line.

Finally, of course, it is still necessary for the state and schools to regulate and restrain the behavior of tutors, and the most important point is not to let tutors have too much power over whether students can graduate or not. In fact, I don't understand very much, why many schools have a tutor group, and there is a defense group during the defense, but whether the graduate student can be sent to the external review, and whether the graduate student can graduate has become a tutor's hall, and other teachers have no right to speak at all, so why do you still have a tutor group and a defense group? There are also people who believe that because of the establishment and improvement of the system of changing supervisors, once a graduate student chooses a supervisor, if it is not suitable, it is simply too difficult to change a supervisor.

I think it should be regulated by the school, which is a very important thing, and the school should be responsible for it, and it should not be ignored.

It should be regulated by the relevant education management departments, and they should not be allowed to infringe on the interests of students.

The behavior of tutors should be regulated by the Ministry of Education, schools, students and other groups, and the Ministry of Education should issue policies, schools should implement them, and students should supervise them.

Master's and doctor's degrees basically rely on their own exploration, and it would be good if the supervisor could provide a direction, and if you have the foundation, funds, and ready-made topics, you should thank God. Don't think that you are the only one who suffers, a master's degree is to learn and exercise your ability to conduct independent research, and a doctorate is to provide you with the opportunity to conduct in-depth research. It's better not to study if your tolerance is too poor, not only is there a risk of not being able to graduate, but it's not good if you can't pass your own level.

Because some people are not capable enough, it is very difficult to study for a master's degree or doctorate. I dropped out of school and was unwilling, and I didn't have a lot to do with my tutor. Students should be trained to learn to stop losses in a hurry, and if they find that they are not the material for learning, they should quickly interrupt their studies. There is only one life, and life is more important than anything else!

Read more and grow your skills. Where there is life, there is hope.

If the psychological quality is not up to par, and you can commit suicide if the tutor does not violate the law or violate human ethics, then it is best not to go to graduate school.

Encountering a teacher who lacks virtue is the luck of eight lifetimes. The Internet exploded that Ling Mouchang, a doctoral supervisor at a military medical university in Shanghai, graduated as a female student for ten years, and she was forced to comply, right?

Do learned people also jump off buildings?

Why can't the doctor jump off the building, the doctor is also a human being, and when people are desperate, what are you angry about.

Life is servitude, death is rest.

Life is not mine, life and death are nothing but exchanges.

Life is like a dream, and gains, losses, sorrows and joys are all vain.

I don't want to live --- jumping off a building. Feeling that life is meaningless, one of the measures that ordinary people often take when they are overly desperate.

--- jumping off a building is not afraid of death, seeing death as home, and not spinning his heel, people with this courage are the most feared.

Huang Chao had this courage, and the Tang Dynasty was in turmoil.

Chen Sheng and Wu Guang had this courage, and the Great Qin Empire was in turmoil.

King Li Chuang had the courage to force Emperor Chongzhen to the coal mountain tree.

Zhu Mao had the courage to make the Jiang dynasty partial to the island.

Jack Ma has the courage to establish his status as a wealthy man in China (if the investment fails, he has to jump off the building, so some people say: what is success, success is those who are "lucky people who jump off the building and are not killed").

As long as you have this courage, whether you are a clay leg or a nobleman, you can do amazing things.

Graduate students will have their own supervisor after admission. In the study career of graduate students, the person who has the most contact with me may be the supervisor. Therefore, the relationship with the supervisor has a very important impact on the graduate study career.

Tao, a former graduate student at Wuhan University of Technology, eventually committed suicide due to excessive mental stress due to his unusual relationship with his supervisor after entering the graduate school. And the tutor who was in charge of taking him was also disqualified from enrollment after he committed suicide. However, two years later, Tao's family found that the school had reinstated the tutor's enrollment qualifications, which made them feel unacceptable, and they questioned the school's move.

What did this mentor do to Tao? Tao's family said that during his graduate studies, the mentor kept asking Tao to do things he didn't want to do. For example, during Tao's break, Tao was asked to do this and that, and these things had nothing to do with studying.

At the same time, he also asked Tao to call himself "father" to show his majesty, and Tao suffered from mental illness after being coerced into doing these things, and finally chose to end his life by suicide under the condition of mental stress. After Tao's suicide, the mentor also publicly apologized and compensated Tao's family. Not only that, but the school also withdrew the tutor's enrollment qualification in time.

In my opinion, the appeal of Tao's family is reasonable. On the premise that the tragedy has already occurred, the school should no longer grant the tutor the right to re-enroll. There are many people who can be mentors in a school, so why do you have to appoint a tainted person to be a mentor?

Fortunately, Wuhan University of Technology said that this list of tutors has not yet been finalized, and the enrollment qualifications of this leader will be evaluated again.

Personally, I think from the law, he has not violated the law, but it is so much more expensive than the market-related **, I feel a bit of a taste of stealing customers, it is not that the price can not be raised, as long as it is within the appropriate range, I think it is still okay, what is done here is a bit excessive, I hope that the relevant departments can introduce relevant regulations to better manage the market.

I think this is normal, because this master committed suicide by jumping off a building, and from a legal point of view, his supervisor is not legally responsible.

Not supported. The essence of such a mentor has not changed, and if you continue to be a mentor, there may be another victim.

I think this is very unfair, and the school's approach is very unkind, and he should be permanently disqualified.

It should be seen whether the tutor has committed infringement or illegal acts, and then the corresponding punishment will be imposed. A teacher with poor moral integrity is not worthy of being a teacher, and I think the teacher should be dismissed.

I don't think there is anything wrong with the tutor reinstating the enrollment qualification, because the tutor did not find anything wrong with the master's degree in normal times, and the tutor himself did not do anything to hurt the master's degree. But as tutors, we should pay more attention to the emotions of our students, because they are also under a lot of pressure.

I don't think this matter should be allowed, even if the tutor reinstates the enrollment qualification, there will be no graduate students applying for the tutor, and the school may soon cancel the tutor's qualification.

I don't think the qualifications should be reinstated, because such a bad incident would have too much impact on the school's reputation.

Later, the mother couldn't bear it anymore and chose to call the police, and after a long police investigation, they found that the professor's criminal behavior was true, arrested him and investigated him for criminal responsibility.

The matter has not yet been clarified, because the professor claims that what the female doctoral student said is false, and there is no conclusive evidence that the professor harassed the female doctoral student.

Later, due to lack of evidence, he died in vain. The female doctor's mother asked the school to investigate the matter many times, but it was always unsuccessful, and it is said that more than 70 calls were made to the school.

I think that the resumption of enrollment by this graduate supervisor is very sad and angry for the family.

I think there's something wrong with that, because the man is dead, and how can he teach the students, so I don't think the school should use the tutor's enrollment quota for its own benefit.

After such a long time, I also investigated a lot of things at that time, and the result was that the supervisor did not find that the graduate student had abnormal emotions, and it was not the supervisor who indirectly caused the accident. In fact, students are under a lot of pressure now, and supervisors should pay more attention to the physical and mental health of graduate students, because graduate students' hearts are also relatively fragile.

I don't think a mentor like this deserves to be in school. So I don't agree with the school's solution to the problem.

I think it's very unwise for the school to fish in troubled waters, and it will be very detrimental to its admissions publicity.

I think it's very unfair. Because the supervisor was not punished in any way, it was unfair to the dead graduate student.

This incident dates back to March 16, 2018, when Tao Chongyuan, a graduate student at the School of Automation at Wuhan University of Technology, committed suicide by jumping from the roof of his dormitory. And this incident also attracted a lot of attention at the time, after this incident, ** also conducted an investigation, and then found that Tao Chongyuan was a suicide, ruling out homicide.

But what makes us feel very incredible is that she is already a graduate student, and it can be said that he has a brilliant future after graduation, so why choose to commit suicide at this time? After conducting an investigation, we discovered an ulterior secret: after Tao Chongyuan's suicide, his family found Tao Chongyuan's chat history with his mentor Wang Pan in a folder on his computer.

In the chat records, we can see that his mentor Wang Pan has been suppressing her, and when he was still in school, Wang Pan asked Tao Chongyuan to do housework for him, cook for him, wash clothes, etc. During this period, Wang Pan also asked Tao Chongyuan to call her father. After this was announced, many people expressed their incredibleness.

Because we didn't expect that the supervisor of the graduate student actually did such a thing, which made us feel very scared, and after this matter was posted on the Internet, he was also suspended. Later, he wrote down the compensation of 650,000 yuan with Tao Chongyuan's parents, and the two reconciled, and this year, someone said that Tao Chongyuan had resumed his enrollment qualifications, which made us feel very incredible.

Because he did such a thing, it made us feel very disgusted, but he actually reinstated the admission. I don't think he deserves to be a teacher, because she directly lost a very young life by doing so, and Tao Chongyuan's parents can be said to be very sad. He can be said to have directly led to the breakdown of a family, and why should he be a teacher with peace of mind?

I don't think it's a good fit, and I don't know what this school thinks.

I don't think it's worthy, after all, if you want to be a teacher, teacher morality is the first, although you are talented, your morality is not good, and what you teach is like that.

I think he can be a teacher, but he should seriously reflect on his teaching style and not have such a tragedy again.

I don't think he deserves it, because what he says and does is not what a teacher should be, and he will teach bad students.