Is it legal to build the third floor next door without permission beyond the boundaries of our two h

Updated on society 2024-06-17
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    It must be illegal, the construction of a house must be approved by the Land Bureau for the approval of the large area, but also have the building structure specifications and standards, not just want to build a few floors, you can report to the superior that his family illegally built a new house, let the relevant departments to control the illegal building he occupies your land and build the third floor without permission, rest assured, it will definitely be able to deal with his family's practice.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Illegal. First of all, land right refers to the right to use within the scope specified in the land use certificate, and in a broad sense, it should include the boundary of the ground and above.

    If the other party's ground boundary crosses the boundary, it is an obvious violation, and if the upper space crosses the boundary, it is also an illegal act after certification, infringing on your own land use rights. You can ask the relevant department (Natural Resources Bureau) to identify and ask the other party to return it.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Whether it is legal should depend on the construction scope delineated on the house construction permit he obtained, if it is legal within the house, otherwise it is not legal, rather than what you say privately and beyond the boundaries to determine whether it is legal.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    1 It is illegal to cover privately 2 This is the key to exceed the boundary between your two families 3 Whether it is illegal or not, you have to make things clear People are good and are bullied 4 Whether the next door greets you 5 Distant relatives are not as good as close neighbors 6 In the end, you have to decide what to do.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Since it is the next door to build the third floor beyond the boundary without permission, of course it is illegal, but it depends on how your boundaries are divided, if it is the boundary divided by the village, it is reasonable to ask him to compensate you according to the local land price!

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Since it's "private", of course, it's not legal - and it crosses the line!

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    This kind of private behavior itself is illegal, and it is unforgivable to exceed the boundary, you can first negotiate with him to solve it, and if it really can't be solved through the relevant departments, then it can only be solved through court litigation.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    If it's definitely not legal, you can go to the local urban construction department or the department in charge to sue them, hoping that they will correct it according to the law.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    As long as the blueprint of the housing base is their own scope, and it is no problem to apply to the housing management for approval, it is illegal to exceed the scope.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    If it is not legal, it can be resolved through negotiation, and if it is not possible, it can be sued to the court to solve it.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Now the construction of a house has to be approved by the planning department, even the renovation of the homestead house must be approved by the planning, without approval is an illegal building, you go to report it will have to be demolished, if not demolished the state will enforce it.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    If it causes harm to you in some way or in some sense, it is not lawful.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    If you think that the other party has built the third floor without the approval of the relevant departments, you can report it to the urban management department of your place of residence and let the urban management intervene in the illegal construction.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    For this matter, we can only ask the relevant departments to coordinate and resolve it through peaceful negotiation!

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    If you have any questions, go to a lawyer to help answer them, I think it should be illegal.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Legal analysis: If the neighbor in front of the party builds a three-story building and does not have an impact on the living environment of the parties, it has no right to interfere, and if the three-story building affects the living environment of the parties, it has the right to interfere, such as affecting the ventilation, lighting, water and other necessities of life.

    Legal basis: The Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

    Article 291: Where the owner of immovable property rights has to use its land for the purposes of passage, etc., it shall provide necessary facilitation to the adjacent rights holders.

    Article 288:Owners of adjacent rights to immovable property shall correctly handle adjacent relationships in accordance with the principles of conducive to production, convenience of life, solidarity and mutual assistance, and fairness and reasonableness.

Related questions
6 answers2024-06-17

This behaviour already constitutes the crime of illegal logging. The crime of illegal logging refers to the act of cutting down forests or other forests owned by the state, collectives or individuals without authorization for the purpose of illegal occupation in violation of national laws and regulations on forest protection, and the amount of trees is relatively large. >>>More

6 answers2024-06-17

First, it is illegal to continue to use the original name without signing a contract. Because Party A enjoys trademark rights. Second, in terms of remedy, on the one hand, it is to change the name and compensate Party A for a part of the money. >>>More

25 answers2024-06-17

This is a house thief. You can file a lawsuit. Steal. can file a case, because it doesn't belong to her, and it is theft if she asks someone to take it. This is a private transfer and concealment of property, and the other party can be demanded.

13 answers2024-06-17

It is an act of superficial appearance, which refers to the act of the actor who, although he does not have the right to do so, has caused the appearance that the bona fide third party has the right to believe that he or she has the right to appear to be the relevant newspaper, and the act is carried out with a bona fide third party and the person is subjected to legal consequences. 2.The contract is valid, and Article 49 of the Contract Law stipulates that "if the actor does not have the right, exceeds the right, or enters into a contract in the name of the person subject to the contract after the termination of the right, and the counterparty has reason to believe that the actor has the right, the act is valid." >>>More

20 answers2024-06-17

It's your responsibility, of course! It's two parts! First of all, if you take someone else's ball and lose it, you will be held responsible! >>>More