What do you think of the noble son?

Although the children of the poor family are poor, they all have their own abilities and talents, and they rely on their own efforts to create a career, such as Ma Yun.

The noble son of the poor family deserves people's respect, and it is very good to succeed by his own efforts without any conditions.

I think that the noble sons of the poor family are particularly worthy of respect, and they have achieved a leap in the value of life through their own efforts.

In fact, I think it is a more correct statement that a noble son is born from a poor family, because most people with good grades are from poor families.

I think that the noble son of the poor family is a very valuable person, because they are from the poor family, but the status is very valuable.

I think the phrase of the poor man is still very reasonable, because the poorer the person, the more obvious his self-motivation and desire to get out of the status quo are.

If you are a poor man, you will be treated a little better than ordinary people, and I feel that they should be more knowledgeable. Let's be smarter.

I think that the noble son of the poor family is very admirable, and it is precisely because of the bad environment that he wants to get rid of this environment.

Successful Liao Liao, hard work is a must, luck is the big thing.

Alms from above, hindrance from below.

No one can get everything easily. As long as you are willing to work hard, you are willing to work hard, plus luck.

In the future, the poor nobles will be mass-produced, on the contrary, those over-learners in the city will pay the price if they don't develop their exams into how to continue to survive.

Not easy, a lot of effort was put in.

I didn't know it before, but it can't be now.

There is some truth to this point of view. Because children from poor families often do not have access to better educational resources, and the family environment is not as good as that of those from well-off families, their parents will pay more attention to their children's education because they understand the power of knowledge. I myself am an example, obviously working harder than others, but the achievements are still different from others, resources are really important, but we must not give up our efforts.

The family is indeed a person who affects the cultivation of a person's temperament, and it is difficult to develop a temperament without basic investment in education.

Whether it is ancient or today, this view is actually normal, family is the most basic condition for a person's temperament and character cultivation; For families with average family conditions, if they don't know how to invest in education, they will only let their children continue to live an ordinary life, and they will be weaker than other children in terms of learning or temperament, and it is difficult to have a high temperament and a good character.

It's not that a poor family can't produce a noble son, it's just that it is difficult to produce a noble son.

Actually, I think this view has a certain degree of correctness. Because of the current poor families, it is difficult for them to provide enough opportunities for their children to study or go to tutoring, and the more ordinary the children now, the more they don't want to work hard, compared to those urban children lack a struggle, and the rural infrastructure is not good, the teaching ability is not enough, and the children themselves do not work hard, which is the reason why it is difficult for the poor to have a noble child.

In today's society, this view is very incorrect. In this information age, as long as you have the ability. You'll have a lot of knowledge at your disposal. Thus taking control of their own destiny. No matter what your background is, as long as you are willing to work hard, then you will definitely succeed.

Nowadays, the society is developing faster and faster, and the difference in education is getting bigger and bigger, and if the children of poor families want to get ahead, it is far from enough to rely on hard work, and I think the main reason is that they lost at the starting line. Today's wealthy families are different from before, they are beginning to realize the importance of education, not only focusing on test scores, but also paying attention to the cultivation of comprehensive quality, and the same is true for society. There are more and more talents, and the competition is becoming more and more fierce, and the children of poor families need to be better.

Because the conditions limit people's play, that is to say, no matter how capable you are, without the support of economic conditions, you may not be able to achieve many things.

For example, if you do well in school, but because your family does not have enough money for you to study, then you may give up your studies, and later your education level will become lower and lower.

I think this kind of talk actually has some truth, but I don't think this sentence is completely correct, maybe as the gap between the rich and the poor increases, and then the distribution of educational resources is more unreasonable, so the children of the poor family just want to get ahead will become a little troublesome, but I think there will still be a fish in the hands of fate, I think although it is getting more and more difficult, but as long as you work hard to study, I think you will still have a chance to get ahead. It just takes a lot more effort.

I think there is a certain reason for the emergence of this sentence, but it is not absolute, I think the main reason for this is that in fact, many times now, rich people also realize the importance of children to endure hardships and have perseverance, and in the rich and noble families, there will not be so many children like in ancient times, and too neglected to discipline, so in comparison, although the children of poor families have compared with noble families, they no longer have the advantages at that time, so I think this sentence makes sense, but it is not absolute.

In ancient times, it was difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family, but now it is difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family, why does this happen?

This is the hottest topic for the CIA, and it is available on the recommendation platform almost every day.

Isn't it entirely correct to say that it is difficult to come out?

1. Whenever the topic of "a noble son from a poor family" is mentioned, most people will have different opinions. Some people say that with the improvement of the current level of economic development, learning is no longer the only way to succeed, and the phrase "a noble son from a poor family" has been said from ancient times that a scholar with poor family conditions has studied hard for more than ten years, and finally succeeded in becoming an official through the imperial examination system, which is no longer applicable to our current life, so "it is difficult to produce a noble son from a poor family". But most people think that this sentence is still very reasonable in our current society, after all, the current college entrance examination system is also an opportunity to change fate, every year there are many poor students through the college entrance examination to enter the famous school, successfully realize their ideals, through their own change of the whole family's economic situation.

In my opinion, the saying that a noble son from a poor family is correct, and I agree with this point of view, and children with poor family conditions are worthy of praise for changing their fate through their own efforts.

2. However, we can also think from another angle, the phrase "a noble son from a poor family" is actually very unfair to many people. This is because the distribution of educational resources in our society is very uneven, such as Beijing and Shanghai and other economically developed cities, where students get the best educational resources due to geographical advantages, but because there are relatively few students, they can almost easily be admitted to their ideal schools. For example, in a large province like Henan, the educational resources here are not as good as those in big cities, and for the poor, the education of the children they can afford will be worse, and for the poor students, it takes more effort to be admitted to a good school.

Therefore, in recent years, we have heard less and less news about "noble sons from poor families". In addition, children from well-off families also have better conditions and resources to learn more knowledge, so as to achieve their all-round development. This is unattainable for poor students.

3. Therefore, we should also look at the problem of a noble son from a poor family from many aspects, analyze it rationally, and think about it in combination with various complex situations in today's society.

Disagree. Because it is only a special case for a wealthy child to come out of a poor family, and now the children of rich families are also very good, so I don't agree with this point of view now.

I don't agree with this point of view, because it has something to do with family education, and it has something to do with the process of growth, in fact, talents can be produced in any environment.

I don't agree with it now, because the gap between urban and rural education is too big now, and it is difficult for poor families to produce noble children.