What do you think are the typical student thinking in the workplace?

Effort is proportional to the reward, and the greater the effort, the greater the reward. This is a constant fact of the school. Whoever works harder generally gets better grades.

But in the world of work and investment, effort does not work well with choice. In 2017, a consultant complained that he entered a traditional company with a salary of 17 and his classmate went to a bank with a salary of 250,000 yuan, and that both of them worked on "failure mode analysis". I said it was just a starting point difference.

In three years' time your wage gap will be even bigger, and today it has been achieved. The reason is simple. The financial industry is rising faster than the entity, and the relationship between whether the individual is good or not is not strong.

Like a person sitting on a giant ball, you can jump very high yourself. But if this ball itself doesn't slowly rise or rise or fall, your final height will be taller than the guys on other balls that are slowly rising. This is more thorough in Professor Zeng Ming's theory of dots and lines

The focus of human efforts, the sector of the company can be seen as the line, and the industry is the utility of the body. The body rises rapidly, and the personal rise rate will be very fast, even if the personal quality is average, you can also get the dividends of the industry. A company also has a distinction between heads and non-heads, and in the heads, that is, in important positions, resources can be obtained far more than in the marginal departments.

Once you choose a sunset job in a sunset industry or company, your efforts are inversely proportional to the feedback. Because you are hardworking, you are the perfect screwman. You will take longer and drag longer in this sunset position.

I've met a consultant who is considering whether or not to go to a thermal power station. It is a local monopoly. His parents retired from the factory and used their connections to open the way for him, hoping that their son would also spend his life safely in the factory.

I nailed it at the time: absolutely not to go. He was surprised, he didn't expect that a good local business would be directly vetoed by me.

I miss you! Thermal power generation is a high energy consumption and high pollution, and it is the local main force in his parents' rough production, but the trend of new energy in the future is contrary! Moreover, as a large-scale enterprise, it is difficult for the ship to turn around.

Don't think that the general trend is far away from you, only by seeing the general trend clearly, can your future be measured in your heart.

Practice is the most important, and lip service is not important. This definitely applies at school. The school does not need to argue on the exam at all, and will not give bonuses for the results of the college entrance examination.

But in the workplace, spout kung fu is too important. Ability to understand reporting, communication, communication with subordinates, etc. In the same way, when you persuade and push other business units, if you have a strong mouth and can push forward, there will be results.

Not only is your mouth sluggish and you can't move, but it also makes other departments feel like you have no excuse to be responsible. What about the report? With the same content, a well-spoken colleague is able to perfectly express the output of the work and is quite satisfying to the leadership skills.

Sluggish mouth in**? Even if a lot of work is done, there are limitations, there are flaws everywhere, and the leadership is very dissatisfied.

I think that my ability is not enough, I still need to prepare, I have a low eye, I don't do work with no technical content, I only know how to execute, I don't know how to think, I don't know how to ask for advice when others come to teach, I don't want to take the initiative to ask for advice, I don't want to take the initiative to communicate and report work.

Afraid of leadership, afraid to express their own views, relatively simple social environment, will not fight for their own interests, and is not very clear about their own positioning.

Typical student thinking in the workplace, I think there are blind and inefficient efforts, seemingly busy, but few real gains, and no clear efficiency first. Believe in pure friendship, no one in the workplace is obligated to be good to you, and you can't be a bad person, you have to stick to your bottom line.

I just like to say that I don't do it, and I often ask each other, but there is no effect, I always think that I will be very good, but the actual starting point is still very low.

01 It's not about you, hang high

The first type of thinking typical of students in the workplace is: it's not about themselves, hang high.

The implication is that they only care about their own duties and are afraid of being responsible.

Many people in the workplace will have such a mentality, I am here to work, I don't have to worry about other things, just go to work hard to earn money, why bother yourself.

In fact, in the workplace, this kind of thing is not about oneself, and there are really a lot of student thinking hanging high.

From an artist's point of view, although it saves his own time. However, there will be cracks in the relationship between colleagues.

Of course, there is also a large reason for the lack of clarity in the division of labor in the team.

Looking at those who are thriving in the workplace, there is basically no situation where they have nothing to do with themselves and hang high.

Because they know that maintaining good relationships in the workplace is the foundation of their lives.

02 Born humble and careful

The second type of thinking typical of students in the workplace is that they are humble and cautious by nature.

The implication is that they don't know how to ask and don't dare to argue.

The baptism of education we have received since childhood is: to be humble, to be kind to others, to be humble and polite in doing things.

However, the humility that many people adhere to in the workplace is exchanged for calming things and harming their own interests.

The value of work is not to have a people-pleasing personality that can soar.

In today's workplace, we don't need to be people like Sima Yi at all, and we have to be patient in everything to be eloquent.

A real professional is a person with problem-solving skills. It is a person who has the courage to seize the opportunity and show his ability.

On the contrary, consistent forbearance and consistent humility will only make others despise you and think that you are a good old man who is easy to bully.

The most important thing in the workplace is to be a good person who has no quarrel with the world, to be yourself, not humble or arrogant.

Therefore, being humble is etiquette, being clear is doing things, not being humble or arrogant is being a man, and you don't have to be cautious about everyone.

03 Obscurity, hard work

The third type of thinking in the workplace is typical of students: obscurity and hard work.

I think there are three points:treat colleagues as friends; Treat the company as a school; Treat work as dedication.

treat colleagues as friends;

When I first graduated, I always used to treat my colleagues who were good to me on the surface as friends, I liked to go with my colleagues no matter what I did, and I liked to share with my colleagues no matter what little secrets I had.

It is impossible for other colleagues to know these words except for me and this colleague, and she must have made a small report to the leader in order to please the leader. After this incident, I began to keep my distance from this colleague, and I never dared to confide my true thoughts to other colleagues easily.

Treat the company as a school;

The company is a place of interests, and colleagues get together to make money, which cannot be compared with simple school life. Don't humbly ask colleagues or leaders for advice without work experience, they must hand themselves over as a matter of course, as the saying goes: teach apprentices to starve to death masters, in this place where competition exists everywhere, self-preservation is king.

Therefore, work experience is not taught by predecessors, but by self-understanding, practice, and summary.

Treat work as dedication.

There is a voice in the company that says: young people should not care so much about gains and losses when they first join the work, and they must dedicate first to have gains, so don't worry about salary and vacation, otherwise it will seem that the pattern is too small and there will be no development in the future.

I think this is the exploitation of college students with no social experience under the cloak of dedication and hypocrisy. The first thing we do to work is to earn money, and if we don't have to come to the company if we don't have to give, any social welfare organization can make us shine. Besides, compassion is mutual, and when we can't afford to eat because we don't have the money to eat, and we can't pay the rent, who can lend a helping hand to us?

Those bigwigs who say that they dedicate first and then return are also dedicated to the company regardless of returns? We must be rewarded for our labor, both legally and morally, and there is no reason to be weak.

Let's first understand what student thinking is:

Students' thinking refers to the process of thinking about a problem, focusing on how to think "should", rather than thinking based on "facts". It is characterized by simplicity, naivety, and immaturity.

Don't take the initiative to ask for advice, get used to others teaching you.

You have to know that your colleagues are busy, no one takes the time to teach you something, even if they are idle, they will not take the initiative to teach you, this is society. Therefore, before encountering problems, you must be clear, first find a way to solve them yourself, and then take the initiative to ask others if you can't solve them.

Do not take the initiative to communicate and report work.

I want to wait for things to be done and give the leader a "perfect" answer.

But if you don't take the initiative to communicate with your leader, he probably doesn't know what you're doing every day, how your work is going, whether you're paddling or working hard. It's easy to create a bad impression in the minds of leaders.

Students will distinguish between right and wrong, and adults will only look at the pros and cons.

Don't overdo what is right or wrong about some things, this is how you deal with them when you were a student. Adults only analyze the pros and cons when dealing with things, because they know that right and wrong are not the point, and the workplace is about interests.

I didn't do much, I said a lot.

There was a lot of talk, but none of them were insights, and none of the suggestions could be adopted by the team, and that was "fake engagement". Fake sense of participation, and the belief that competition is fair, means "zero contribution rate". The workplace is a place to prove personal value and create personal wealth.

Talk less, do more.

Believe that competition is fair.

The competition mechanism of exam-oriented education is relatively fair - test scores are the only criterion, as long as you are willing to learn, no one will be far behind. But the competition in society is far more complex than that. Because no one can survive by a single principle.

So if you see that the relationship can always be easily on the top; Seeing that some people are opportunistic and make small means to break through; I saw a lot of people being sleek and sleek. There is no need to complain that "we have been smoothed out by the world";

Classroom-style "dependence, treating colleagues and bosses as teachers."

For fresh graduates who are ignorant of anything, the company will generally give some corresponding guidance. But as soon as I left clear and clear guidance, I began to lose my direction. When others no longer help them, they start to complain and take their help for granted.

This is all due to the habits on campus, our teachers will always explain each question carefully, and the teacher will also indicate the key points of the questions to be tested in the exam, which often ignores the thinking of the topic and will not explore a new way to solve the problem.

Students' thinking refers to the process of thinking about a problem, focusing on how to think "should", rather than thinking based on "facts". It is characterized by simplicity, naivety, and immaturity.

For example, you think that your colleague Zhang Wen's work diary is very good, and you just don't understand a lot when you first enter the workplace, so you say: "Sister Wen, your work diary is really well written, can you lend me a look?" Zhang Wen: "It's not very convenient. ”

Do you think you didn't understand the class, so you can refer to the notes at the same table? This is people's hard work experience, why lend it to you. Naive.

But you can say something like: "Sister Wen, your work diary is really well written, can I ask you if I don't understand anything in the future?" "It's all colleagues, and you're new here, so it's naturally okay to point and point.

Newcomers who have just left school feel that they should learn from colleagues with rich work experience, but they have never thought that they have no obligation to you, so why should they teach you? Or "I'm busy, why should I share my hard work experience with you?" Are there any benefits?

No. So why should I teach you? So I combined the feedback of the old birds in the workplace, and summarized the top ten typical student thinking that newcomers in the workplace are most common for the reference of people working in the workplace.

When I was a student, I wanted to fight for right and wrong in everything. But in the minds of people in the workplace, they only want to see the results, and they only want to see what the job is beneficial to them. The workplace is a very realistic environment, and it is only about profit.

In order to improve everyone's productivity, don't talk a lot of nonsense. In the workplace, you need to pay attention to the equivalent exchange, and don't think that everyone will help you without expecting anything in return. Other people are also busy with their work, and they are not obligated to help someone all the time.

Typical student thinking is to strive for perfection no matter what you do, and then many things will be particularly clear, some ideologies can't keep up, very persistent, for a thing requires a fixed answer, don't know how to be flexible, do things a tendon.

will think things very simply, will also think people are very simple, will often do some stupid things, will also yell at others, will not respect anyone, and will be very irritable.

It is rare to have the idea of learning from each other's strengths, to be more singular when doing things, and then there is no cooperative thinking, no matter what the occasion will be active learning, no matter when will show a more humble side.